• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF Interim Thread of cunning stunts and desperate punts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Holy shit @ McCain's comments in Florida.

What's Obama's email address, Anihawk? They need to bombard the media with this. This should be McCain's illegitimate black child for this election. This should be a Dukakis/Helmet moment.
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
MThanded said:
http://money.cnn.com/data/markets/

Wall of red.

Bush economic plan in action.

Needs more deregulation! You just wait and see!

How the 158-year-year institution came to this is a tale of hubris and overreaching -- and a big dose of bad luck.

Lehman's fall from grace was brutally fast. Until June, it had never even reported a quarterly loss as a public company.

As recently as March, Fuld was awarded a $22 million bonus for 2007 -- a generous pay package to be sure, but one that also reflected a year in which the bank's net profit had risen 5 percent to a record $4.2 billion.

But Lehman soon emerged as Wall Street's next domino as real estate loans and other toxic assets increasingly weighed on its balance sheet, especially after the collapse of Bear Stearns Cos Inc in March.

Still, few were willing to second-guess its 62-year-old chief executive.

"Fuld went wrong in not taking seriously enough the impairment of his balance sheet," said Charles Peabody, analyst at independent research firm Portales Partners.

http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUSN1341059120080914
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
Obama's on it, people!

CHICAGO (AP) - Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama said Monday the upheaval on Wall Street was "the most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression" and blamed it on policies that he said Republican rival John McCain supports.

"This country can't afford another four years of this failed philosophy," Obama said after the shock-wave announcements that financial giant Lehman Brothers was filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy while titan Merrill Lynch was being bought by Bank of America for about $50 billion.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9374EMO0&show_article=1

The fuck you take him for?
 

VanMardigan

has calmed down a bit.
The first article on it is just too tame. :(

McCain: Wall Street woes point to regulation need

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. - Republican presidential candidate John McCain said Monday he still believes the fundamentals of the nation's economy are strong even as the uncertain fate of two of Wall Street's oldest institutions sent stocks tumbling.
In remarks to a crowd of several thousand in this pivotal electoral state, the Arizona senator said he agreed there should be no taxpayer-financed bailout of Lehman Brothers even as the investment banking giant filed for bankruptcy. Meanwhile, Merrill Lynch was selling itself to Bank of America for less than half of the iconic brokerage firm's recent value.

Reacting to the turmoil on Wall Street, the Dow dropped some 300 points.

"Our economy, I believe, still, the fundamentals of our economy are strong, but these are very, very difficult times, so I promise you: We will never put America in this position again. We will clean up Wall Street," McCain said.

He added: "The McCain-Palin administration will replace an outdated, patchwork quilt of regulatory oversight and bring transparency and accountability to Wall Street. We will have transparency and accountability and we will reform the regulatory bodies of government."

The GOP nominee underscored his message with a new campaign television commercial that seemed to contradict his rosier assessment of the country's economic health.

It is titled, "Crisis" and said, "Our economy in crisis. Only proven reformers John McCain and Sarah Palin can fix it. Tougher rules on Wall Street to protect your life savings. No special interest giveaways. Lower taxes to create new jobs. Offshore drilling to reduce gas prices."

Details about the size and location of the advertising buy were not immediately available.

Over the weekend, advisers both to McCain and Democratic rival Barack Obama said they did not favor a government bailout of Lehman Brothers like that previously provided to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The government also help engineer the recent sale of Bear Stearns Cos. to J.P. Morgan & Co.

During his speech, McCain reiterated that position, saying, "We believe the time has come and gone that taxpayers should be viewed as the solution to problems not of their making."

The financial turmoil threatened to overshadow two events on McCain's schedule not seen in weeks: his solo campaign rally and a town hall meeting.

The Republican presidential contender visited the city where he once commanded a Navy squadron for his first individual rally since announcing Sarah Palin as his running mate over two weeks ago. Then he was flying to Orlando to take questions from an audience for the first time since a session in Las Cruces, N.M., before he accepted his party's nomination at the Republican National Convention.

Aides hoped for a sizable turnout for the Jacksonville rally, a special wish after Palin drew thousands Saturday in Carson City, Nev.

McCain was greeted by a crowd of several thousand who filled less than a quarter of the Jacksonville Veterans Memorial Arena.

In a personal remark rarely made on the trail, he thanked the audience for caring for his first wife, Carol, and their three children during the 5 1/2 years he was a Vietnam prisoner of war.

"I hope you know that in the years I was away in prison, the people of Orange Park, Fla., took care of my wife and family," McCain said. "The people of Jacksonville opened their hearts to my family. For that, I will be extremely grateful. My children had about 50,000 parents while I was gone and I'm very grateful."

edit: Source is Yahoo.
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
AniHawk said:
Chillthefuckoutigotthis.jpg
"The challenges facing our financial system today are more evidence that too many folks in Washington and on Wall Street weren't minding the store," Obama said in a statement. "Eight years of policies that have shredded consumer protections, loosened oversight and regulation, and encouraged outsized bonuses to CEOs while ignoring middle-class Americans have brought us to the most serious financial crisis since the Great Depression."

HE'S ON LIKE DONKEY KONG BITCHES
 
I emailed Obamaton. This is what I said:

Today, Monday September 15, Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy and Merril Lynch sold itself to Bank of America. While the stock market tumbles and Wall Street is panicking, this is what John McCain had to say to a crowd in Florida - a state wrecked by the home foreclosure crisis:

"The fundamentals of our economy are strong"

SOURCE (with video): http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/McCain_Fundamentals_are_still_strong.html?showall

This needs to be in every ad from here to the election. Obama needs to call a press conference right now. This is a Dukakis/Helmet moment, and should be constantly hammered home.

McCain is totally out of touch. Please, I really want Obama to win this election and this opportunity cannot be passed up.

<3

DO IT GAF. WITH OUR POWERS COMBINED, WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE

Here's the address:

http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/contact2
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
VanMardigan said:
The first article on it is just too tame. :(
It is titled, "Crisis" and said, "Our economy in crisis. Only proven reformers John McCain and Sarah Palin can fix it. Tougher rules on Wall Street to protect your life savings. No special interest giveaways. Lower taxes to create new jobs. Offshore drilling to reduce gas prices."

McCain either just doesn't fucking get it, or he is the biggest shill in politics today.
 

Y2Kev

TLG Fan Caretaker Est. 2009
McCain :lol

What a joke. What fundamentals? Financial system is in crisis, unemployment is the highest its been in a while, oil prices and food prices are trending up (though oil is down for the moment)...

What exactly is strong? The "american spirit?" Is this some Mitt Romney shit up in here?

edit: NY POST :lol :lol OUTRAGE!11
 

JohnTinker

Limbaugh Parrot
Can't believe the gall he has to try to do this

WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.

According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.

"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington," Zebari said in an interview.


Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops - and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its "state of weakness and political confusion."

"However, as an Iraqi, I prefer to have a security agreement that regulates the activities of foreign troops, rather than keeping the matter open." Zebari says.

Though Obama claims the US presence is "illegal," he suddenly remembered that American troops were in Iraq within the legal framework of a UN mandate. His advice was that, rather than reach an accord with the "weakened Bush administration," Iraq should seek an extension of the UN mandate.

While in Iraq, Obama also tried to persuade the US commanders, including Gen. David Petraeus, to suggest a "realistic withdrawal date." They declined.

Obama has made many contradictory statements with regard to Iraq. His latest position is that US combat troops should be out by 2010. Yet his effort to delay an agreement would make that withdrawal deadline impossible to meet.

Supposing he wins, Obama's administration wouldn't be fully operational before February - and naming a new ambassador to Baghdad and forming a new negotiation team might take longer still.

By then, Iraq will be in the throes of its own campaign season. Judging by the past two elections, forming a new coalition government may then take three months. So the Iraqi negotiating team might not be in place until next June.

Then, judging by how long the current talks have taken, restarting the process from scratch would leave the two sides needing at least six months to come up with a draft accord. That puts us at May 2010 for when the draft might be submitted to the Iraqi parliament - which might well need another six months to pass it into law.

Thus, the 2010 deadline fixed by Obama is a meaningless concept, thrown in as a sop to his anti-war base.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and the Bush administration have a more flexible timetable in mind.

According to Zebari, the envisaged time span is two or three years - departure in 2011 or 2012. That would let Iraq hold its next general election, the third since liberation, and resolve a number of domestic political issues.

Even then, the dates mentioned are only "notional," making the timing and the cadence of withdrawal conditional on realities on the ground as appreciated by both sides.

Iraqi leaders are divided over the US election. Iraqi President Jalal Talabani (whose party is a member of the Socialist International) sees Obama as "a man of the Left" - who, once elected, might change his opposition to Iraq's liberation. Indeed, say Talabani's advisers, a President Obama might be tempted to appropriate the victory that America has already won in Iraq by claiming that his intervention transformed failure into success.

Maliki's advisers have persuaded him that Obama will win - but the prime minister worries about the senator's "political debt to the anti-war lobby" - which is determined to transform Iraq into a disaster to prove that toppling Saddam Hussein was "the biggest strategic blunder in US history."

Other prominent Iraqi leaders, such as Vice President Adel Abdul-Mahdi and Kurdish regional President Massoud Barzani, believe that Sen. John McCain would show "a more realistic approach to Iraqi issues."

Obama has given Iraqis the impression that he doesn't want Iraq to appear anything like a success, let alone a victory, for America. The reason? He fears that the perception of US victory there might revive the Bush Doctrine of "pre-emptive" war - that is, removing a threat before it strikes at America.

Despite some usual equivocations on the subject, Obama rejects pre-emption as a legitimate form of self -defense. To be credible, his foreign-policy philosophy requires Iraq to be seen as a failure, a disaster, a quagmire, a pig with lipstick or any of the other apocalyptic adjectives used by the American defeat industry in the past five years.

Yet Iraq is doing much better than its friends hoped and its enemies feared. The UN mandate will be extended in December, and we may yet get an agreement on the status of forces before President Bush leaves the White House in January.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/0915200...o_stall_gis_iraq_withdrawal_129150.htm?page=0

I don't see how you can try to defend this. I find it really disgusting
 

reilo

learning some important life lessons from magical Negroes
NY Post :lol :lol :lol :lol

You do realize you are quoting a tabloid run by Murdoch, right?
 

Barrett2

Member
Y2Kev said:
McCain :lol

What a joke. What fundamentals? Financial system is in crisis, unemployment is the highest its been in a while, oil prices and food prices are trending up (though oil is down for the moment)...

What exactly is strong? The "american spirit? Is this some Mitt Romney shit up in here?

The house-cleaning industry is at an all time high. amirite?
 

syllogism

Member
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/obama_camp_mccains_strong_fund.php

The Obama campaign will seize on comments John McCain made at an event in Florida this morning to portray the Republican ticket as fundamentally out of touch with American voters.

McCain, speaking before a town hall meeting, said that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong" before adding the caution that "these are very, very difficult times and I promise you we will never put America in this position again."

An Obama aide calls the first part of McCain's sentence "an enormous mistake," and said that the campaign will seek to amplify the comment through surrogates, principles and maybe even television ads.
 
I find it hilarious how McCain/Palin's entire platform is "We will fix things!"

They never say what they will fix, they never say what policies they will enact. They never say ANYTHING substantial. They are just relying on average white voter to vote for the familiar ticket on the trust factor.

So fucking ridiculous. If they win this election I'm probably done with politics.

syllogism said:


OMG THEY LISTENED TO ME OBAMATON HIRE ME I WILL WORK FOR FREE
 

Falch

Member
reilo said:
It is titled, "Crisis" and said, "Our economy in crisis. Only proven reformers John McCain and Sarah Palin can fix it. Tougher rules on Wall Street to protect your life savings. No special interest giveaways. Lower taxes to create new jobs. Offshore drilling to reduce gas prices."

Isn't this just factually incorrect?
 

SnakeXs

about the same metal capacity as a cucumber
Y2Kev said:
McCain :lol

What a joke. What fundamentals? Financial system is in crisis, unemployment is the highest its been in a while, oil prices and food prices are trending up (though oil is down for the moment)...

What exactly is strong? The "american spirit?" Is this some Mitt Romney shit up in here?

edit: NY POST :lol :lol OUTRAGE!11

Even Mittens has been facepalming lately. :lol
 

scorcho

testicles on a cold fall morning
JohnTinker said:
Can't believe the gall he has to try to do this
I don't see how you can try to defend this. I find it really disgusting
let your disgust subside until other media outlets pick it up and verify it. until then this is nothing but static. this isn't a news article - it's an op-ed piece.
 

JohnTinker

Limbaugh Parrot
Falch said:
Isn't this just factually incorrect?
Economics_supply_shock.png
 

Barrett2

Member
JohnTinker said:
Can't believe the gall he has to try to do this

I don't see how you can try to defend this. I find it really disgusting


Hey dude, remember how Ronald Reagan SOLD MISSILES TO IRAN BEFORE GETTING ELECTED? Go peddle your faux outrage somewhere else.
 
John McCain's cousin: McCain sold his soul in desperation to get elected

Recently, my father gave me an envelope full of press clippings which chronicle the history of a very notable part of our family. Most of the articles come from the Florida Times-Union, a Jacksonville-based paper he read during the '60s and '70s when he taught at Lake City Community College. They detail the years in which my cousin, then-Lt. Cmdr. John S. McCain, was imprisoned in North Vietnam.

John and I are related through our grandmothers. Katherine Vaulx McCain and Huetta Vaulx Boles, both of Fayetteville, Ark., were sisters. My side of the Vaulx family represents a long line of Democrats, but it is with no small amount of pride that we've followed the life and career of now-Sen. John McCain.

My dad knew John when he was a child, and maintained a close relationship with his father, Adm. Jack McCain. When my dad was a teenager, the McCains visited his family in Arkansas around the time my great-uncle, John's grandfather, was commanding an aircraft carrier group in the Pacific during World War II.

He and Jack remained close over the years, exchanging many letters while my dad was in Lake City and Jack was commanding the fleet in the Pacific during Vietnam. When John was taken prisoner, the letters my dad sent took on a tone of deep concern and sympathy.

My father is, above anything else, dedicated to his family. Although he had never met John's then-wife, Carol, he knew that she lived an hour away, just outside of Jacksonville. He did everything he could to make sure she was taken care of during that time.

Although neither my father nor I have ever voted for a Republican, when John threw his hat in the ring in 2000, we were both very proud and encouraged, and not just because he's our relative. This was the first Republican who, on a national stage, was saying things like, "If we repeal Roe vs. Wade tomorrow, thousands of young American women will be performing illegal and dangerous operations," and, "Neither party should be defined by pandering to the outer-reaches of American politics and the agents of intolerance." Wow!

Here was a man who was not abiding by partisan lines, who was, instead, living up to his promise of "straight talk" and commonsense thinking. The right-wing Republican base may not have agreed with everything he said, but the rest of America certainly respected him for speaking his mind honestly.

Jump ahead to the campaign Sen. McCain is currently running. Clearly, a lot can change in eight years. Our nation has gone from a time of unparalleled prosperity and peace to one marked by debt in the trillions of dollars, record foreclosures, and a global reputation for warmongering and neo-imperialism.

So, where is the straight-talking, commonsense John McCain of 2000? I'm afraid he is long gone, replaced by a desperate version of himself who seems to contradict nearly everything he once stood for.

What becomes apparent in his ideological about-face is just how out of touch McCain really is with America's working families.

In a time when the country is facing the worst housing crisis in the memory of most Americans, McCain couldn't even recall how many homes he owns. When asked how many homes my side of the family owns, I can answer you pretty quickly. Zero.

Just like so many working families in this country, we were nearly ruined by the ongoing mortgage and foreclosure crisis. Our family home of three generations was sold at auction last year. The story is a familiar one: We were suckered into a refinance deal during the real estate boom, and when times got tough, the near criminally deregulated mortgage companies changed the rules on us.

What was John McCain's response to this? He lumped together all the families who fell victim to the smarmy sales pitches from subprime lenders, calling us "irresponsible," a move the New York Times described as "mean-spirited and economically naive."

What contortions has this new John McCain twisted himself into in order to win this election? When asked last year about his stance on abortion, he told a group of supporters, "I do not support Roe vs. Wade. It should be overturned." This statement not only sharply contrasts with what he said back in the 2000 election cycle, but is also at odds with a majority of American public opinion, according to the most recent Harris poll on the subject.

Further, McCain's decision to put the antichoice, creationist Sarah Palin on his ticket appears to be motivated completely by a political desire to shore up the radical right evangelical base with whom he's been at odds for so long. This is the same woman who claimed in June "that our national leaders are sending (our soldiers) out on a task that is from God."

A part of me is made very sad to write this article. As I've said, my family has followed John's life and career with no absence of pride. If there ever were a Republican we might consider voting for, it would have been my cousin John.

But, as he continually demonstrates in this campaign, my cousin John is long gone. "Straight talk" has been replaced with "flip-flop." Saddest all, this is the same man who, when campaigning in 2000, told a crowd of supporters, "I don't think Bill Gates needs a tax cut. I think your parents do."

My parents, John, need some help after the economic destruction Bush has wrought in the last eight years, but it's clear you're not the one who'll give it to us. America's working families no longer recognize you, nor does your own.

Adam Vaulx Boles lives and works in Tallahassee.


http://www.tampabay.com/news/perspective/article806980.ece
 

Tim-E

Member
artredis1980 said:
JohnTinker
Limbaugh Parrot
(Today, 03:08 PM)
Reply | Quote

JohnTinker said:
Can't believe the gall he has to try to do this



http://www.nypost.com/seven/0915200...o_stall_gis_iraq_withdrawal_129150.htm?page=0

I don't see how you can try to defend this. I find it really disgusting


http://www.nypost.com

http://www.nypost.com/seven/09082008/postopinion/editorials/post_endorses_john_mccain_128044.htm


yeah.....
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol I love it.
 

AniHawk

Member
lawblob said:
Hey dude, remember how Ronald Reagan SOLD MISSILES TO IRAN BEFORE GETTING ELECTED? Go peddle your faux outrage somewhere else.

But Ronald Reagan is an American hero. He tore down the Berlin Wall with his bare hands and saved the Earth from Communism forever. Hallowed be His name.
 

Kildace

Member
JohnTinker said:
Can't believe the gall he has to try to do this

I don't see how you can try to defend this. I find it really disgusting

So um, this article is basically based on a single, 2nd hand Obama sentence :

"He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington," Zebari said in an interview.

Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops - and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its "state of weakness and political confusion."

Which is not stalling withdrawal, but asking for a withdrawal agreement with a non-lame duck president. Nothing in this article even suggests that Obama's withdrawal agreement would make the troops come home any later than the current one. The rest of the article is pure conjecture and drivel. Great find.
 

MThanded

I Was There! Official L Receiver 2/12/2016
JohnTinker said:
Yeah... thanks for addressing whats in the article there buddy!
Theres nothing to address. Look up the author on wikipedia and you will see why there nothing to address

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amir_Taheri

Controversies

Iranian sumptuary law

Main article: 2006 Iranian sumptuary law controversy

On May 19, 2006, the National Post of Canada published two pieces, one by Taheri, claiming that the Iranian parliament passed a law that "envisages separate dress codes for religious minorities, Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians, who will have to adopt distinct colour schemes to make them identifiable in public."[7] Numerous other sources, including Maurice Motamed, the Jewish member of the Iranian parliament, refuted the report as untrue. The Associated Press later refuted the report as well, saying that "a draft law moving through parliament encourages Iranians to wear Islamic clothing to protect the country's Muslim identity but does not mention special attire for religious minorities, according to a copy obtained Saturday by The Associated Press." [8] Reuters also reported that "A copy of the bill obtained by Reuters contained no such references. Reuters correspondents who followed the dress code session in parliament as it was broadcast on state radio heard no discussion of proscriptions for religious minorities."[9] Taheri insisted that his report is correct and that "the dress code law has been passed by the Islamic Majlis and will now be submitted to the Council of Guardians", claiming that that "special markers for followers of Judaism, Christianity and Zoroastrianism are under discussion as a means to implement the law".[10]

The National Post retracted the story several hours after it was posted online. The newspaper blamed Taheri for the falsehood in the article,[11][12] and published a full apology on May 24.[13] Taheri stood by his article.[10][14]

Javad Zarif accusations

Dwight Simpson of San Francisco State University and Kaveh Afrasiabi accuse Taheri and his publisher Eleana Benador of fabricating false stories in the New York Post in 2005 where Taheri identified Iran's UN ambassador Javad Zarif as one of the students involved in the 1979 seizure of hostages at the US Embassy in Tehran. Zarif was Simpson's teaching assistant and a graduate student in the Department of International Relations of San Francisco State University at the time.[15]

Nest of Spies

Shaul Bakhash of George Mason University has accused Amir Taheri of concocting nonexistent conpiracies in his writings, and states that he "repeatedly refers us to books where the information he cites simply does not exist. Often the documents cannot be found in the volumes to which he attributes them.... [He] repeatedly reads things into the documents that are simply not there."[15] Bakhash has stated that Taheri's 1988 Nest of Spies is "the sort of book that gives contemporary history a bad name."[15]

The Sunni-Shiite terror network

In a 29 March 2008 opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, Taheri makes the statement that, "The truth is that Sunni and Shiite extremists have always been united in their hatred of the U.S.", and alleges that Iranian Government supports Sunni groups such as Al Qaeda. [16] Under Sunni groups, Taheri mentiones the Talysh nationalist movement in the republic of Azerbaijan the Rastakhiz party in Tajikistan.[16] However, the Talysh are predominantly Shia[17] with a Sunni minority in the mountainous regions.[18] Rastakhiz (Islamic Renaissance Party) was incorported into the United Tajik Opposition (UTO) was an amalgam of nationalist and Islamist parties and movements. The war's greatest destruction and toll in civilian deaths was in the south, where Kuliabis and their allies conducted campaigns of "ethnic cleansing" against local residents of Gharmi and Pamiri origin. The height of hostilities occurred between 1992 and 1993 and pitted Kulyabi militias against an array of groups, including militants from the Islamic Renaissance Party (IRP) and ethnic minority Pamiris from Gorno-Badakhshan. In large part due to the foreign support they received, the Kulyabi militias were able to soundly defeat opposition forces and went on what has been described by Human Rights Watch as an ethnic cleansing campaign against Pamiris and Garmis.[19] The Pamiri people are Ismaili Shiites. In fact Iran does not support the Sunni movement of Tajikistan and is instead betting on a stabilized country linked to it by Persian culture. Iran and Russia, the most important foreign powers in the country, had developed common interests and Iran needs to preserve its cooperative relationship with Russia. Especially after the rise to power in Afghanistan of the mainly Pashtun Islamic Movement of Taliban (Islamic students) with Pakistani and Saudi support, Russia, Iran, and Uzbekistan became even more alarmed about the situation there. All were in different ways aiding the non-Pashtun (Tajik, Uzbek, and Shia Hazara) forces resisting the Taliban in north Afghanistan. Iran and Russia also had similar interests in the Caspian Sea, in limiting Western involvement in Central Asia, and in increasing their leverage over Afghanistan.[20] Shi’ite Iran nearly went to war against the Taliban after the massacre of Afghan Shi’ites and nine Iranian diplomats in Mazar-e-Sharif in 1998.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
reilo said:
NY Post :lol :lol :lol :lol

You do realize you are quoting a tabloid run by Murdoch, right?

That entire piece neither uses nor attributes any actual quotes from the alleged parties - and what's weirder, appears to rely on hearsay from the actual columnist. BTW, who's this John Tinker character? Looks like he's on a roll!

Edit: Reads post above mine. Lols.
 

bob_arctor

Tough_Smooth
JohnTinker said:
I don't see how you can try to defend this. I find it really disgusting

:lol I really wanted to see who would dare reference this op-ed. Written by one Amir Taheri. Let's all do a little research on him. He seems so very trustworthy.

Edit: Oh wait, someone already did some research and lo and behold Mr. OMGINVADEIRAQOMGIRANEVIL is full of shit. Whod'a thunk it?
 
JohnTinker said:
Yeah... thanks for addressing whats in the article there buddy!

Amir Taheri who wrote this article is a Muslim, and he supports McCain and says Obama is not good for country

Obama = Christian confirmed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom