Zeliard said:What's with the pessimism dude? You even thought he was about to cave in right literally before he said that the debate will still go on.
HOPE. BELIEVE.
I just thought it could be bigger is all.
Zeliard said:What's with the pessimism dude? You even thought he was about to cave in right literally before he said that the debate will still go on.
HOPE. BELIEVE.
It is sad to see the nation so divided. In all those states that McCain leads in, he leads by double-digits.Zeliard said:
Tamanon said:47/46, their polling demographics are always a bit odd, they don't experiment as much.
Dax01 said:If McCain were to get up at 3 am, he would break his back. Go easy on him.
GhaleonEB said:That's up only one point from the one right after the GOP convention. I'm dubious that's the number, as well. It doesn't get released for another hour and fifteen minutes, I have a hard time thinking they'd just blow that out there.
GhaleonEB said:That's up only one point from the one right after the GOP convention. I'm dubious that's the number, as well. It doesn't get released for another hour and fifteen minutes, I have a hard time thinking they'd just blow that out there.
mj1108 said:Matthews is owning right now on MSNBC bringing up the point that he's been able to go out and campaign and do other things yet he can't debate.
They put it out early.Tamanon said:Oh it's not released yet? That's what Hardball put out there.
In other words, "the news we were trying to make just got buried. Might as well throw it out there."The 6:30 pm ET release for the poll was moved up due to today's news on the campaign trail. We'll have more on the poll shortly on MSNBC.com.
McCain advisors say they will do all the debates but the schedule is up in the air.
They also deny that there is a political calculation in this and say without action the country could slide into a Depression by Monday and added "we'll see 12 percent unemployment" if action is not completed. GOP sources say they believe the current deal is dead on the Hill and reject suggestions that without McCain's vote Democrats would not support a package.
Wes said:What the hell would happen then?
Robert L. Borosage, Institute for America's Future:
Brilliant McCain. The going gets tough and the tough call time out. Suddenly, the bold leader wants to return to being one of 100 with lots of protective cover. Safety in numbers? Sure. Leadership? Not so much.
Stephen M. Walt, Professor of International Affairs, Harvard:
McCain's proposal strikes me as a political gambit, not an act of genuine "statesmanship." Returning to Washington to meet with "congressional leaders" isn't going to fix the financial crisis;
David Marin, Republican strategist:
This is a smart and savvy move at a moment when his campaign needed one.
Richard Hasen, Professor, Loyola Law School in Los Angeles:
I think this is a risky move for Sen. McCain. It will fit into the story line of the campaign not wishing to engage on the issues (such as by keeping Gov. Palin from the press).
Jeff Shesol, Speechwriter, author and comic-strip artist:
McCain's move carries a whiff -- make that a strong odor -- of desperation. Common ground is one thing (and a fine thing); calling a halt to debate and discussion, as if real differences don't exist or don't still matter, is another.
Jan Baran, Attorney, ethics, lobbying and election law:
One has to admire the tactic whether it works or not.
Mickey Edwards, Princeton lecturer and former Republican congressman:
Oh, brother. What idiot came up with this stunt?
Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Professor at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, Harvard:
Not smart. I agree with Mickey Edwards. It is not as if McCain has a reputation for being able to contribute to the solution of this economic problem, and it smacks of "you can run, but you can't hide." I think this is more likely to raise doubts rather than reassure independent voters.
Ron Bonjean, Republican strategist:
What is fascinating about this move is that it now allows McCain to position himself as a leader and Senator Obama to seem ambitious.
Kevin Madden, Republican strategist:
This is the McCain that swing voters love, especially Democrats and independents. John McCain as The General: no nonsense, country first, progress before partisanship.
Norman J. Ornstein, Resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute:
Senator McCain's move to suspend his campaign and call for delay in the debate has to raise an eyebrow. It would be one thing if we were in genuine gridlock. We are not. We are in the midst of tough end-game negotiations. If they were to fail, and the markets reacted badly, that would be the time to suspend campaigns and suspend debates. Substantively, and outside the realm of narrow presidential politics 41 days before the election, This move has to be seen with some skepticism.
Grover Norquist, President of Americans for Tax Reform:
Smart move.
Gary Clyde Hufbauer, Economist, Peterson Institute:
Smart move for McCain. With Obamas lead growing by the hour, McCain needs dramatic action to stay in the game -- or pray that Obama stumbles. Obama is not about to stumble by nixing the bailout.
Bradley A. Smith, :
Either Senator McCain is putting the needs of his country before those of the campaign, and returning to Washington to help deal with this serious issue, or, after a bad week in the polls, he is again trying to shake up the campaign landscape, demonstrating that he's not going to go down without a fight. Either way, but especially assuming the former, it reflects well on McCain.
Christine Pelosi, Attorney, author and Democratic activist:
By suspending the campaign does McCain mean he will pull the TV ad blaming Obama for the Fannie/Freddie problem without disclosing that McCain's campaign manager's firm makes $15,000 a month from Fannie? That suspension is most welcome.
Tom Korologos, Former ambassador, consultant and Republican strategist:
My word for this is: Leadership on McCains part. Right On!
Joe Lockhart, Democratic strategist, former Clinton White House :
John McCain and his campaign obviously think the American people are not very smart. In fact hes betting his whole campaign on it. Heres what theyre hoping no one figures out.
Adam Bonin, Attorney and Chairman, Netroots Nation:
Like the selection of Sarah Palin, this feels like a panicky move borne of political expediency rather than anything which will lead to better governance and policymaking.
Celinda Lake, Democratic strategist:
Audacious but makes him look like a coward.
Eric Liu, Author and former Clinton White House adviser, WA:
The financial crisis is a "show, don't tell" opportunity for both candidates to reveal the content of their patriotism.
Walter Dellinger, Attorney:
Calling off the presidential debate cannot possibly make sense --when the candidates can just call off preparing for the debate and have it DC.
McCain would loseWes said:It would be awesome if McCain didn't appear at the debate on Friday (just because I don't think it's ever happened before). What the hell would happen then?
Wes said:It would be awesome if McCain didn't appear at the debate on Friday (just because I don't think it's ever happened before). What the hell would happen then?
Mickey Edwards, Princeton lecturer and former Republican congressman:
Oh, brother. What idiot came up with this stunt?
Awesome.artredis1980 said:Politico Analysts on the days events
Ether_Snake said:I think I figured out why Bush will address the nation tonight.
He's going to push for a certain version of the plan.
Then McCain will oppose it, and offer a "better" one. You know, to save his Maverick image. One the administration actually already agrees with.
Several questions. But two key ones.
What to do about debates?
Hold as Scheduled 50%
Hold with Econ Focus 36%
Postpone 10%
Suspend Campaigns?
Suspend 14%
Continue 31%
Refocus on Fin. Crisis 48%
Would canceling the debates be good for America? 14% say yes.
Dax01 said:I'm telling you guys, Obama debating himself would be so awesome.
He'll probably even do impersonations.
Tamanon said:Snap SUSA poll today, taken from TPM.
This might backfire.:lol
YES! I've stopped watching CNN during the day because of him. Bring back Don Lemon!Gary Whitta said:Does anyone else find CNN's Rick Sanchez really irritating?
Odrion said:best. election. eveeerrrr
And that's before Obama's "presidents should be able to do more than one thing at a time" response.artredis1980 said:and to think the first impressions of mccains maverick decisions are always positive, if this has started as a negative,
GAME OVER
Amir0x said:either way, this election season is absurd.
i hope i get to see another one this insane in my lifetime
Learn to throw your voice! Fool your friends! Fun at parties!Dax01 said:I'm telling you guys, Obama debating himself would be so awesome.
He'll probably even do impersonations.
Got to work on that 8-12 demographic.woxel1 said:Learn to throw your voice! Fool your friends! Fun at parties!
What is fascinating about this move is that it now allows McCain to position himself as a leader and Senator Obama to seem ambitious.