tak said:The sad part about this whole thing is McCain is going to be asked why he didn't want to show up to the debate and he is going to have a response the majority of American's will think is good (I felt our country is more important then politics).
Unless you don't think the bill is going to be passed at all, the best case scenario for McCain is that this buys him some time--maybe a week, tops--so why would he go for this move with the election still relatively far away? It doesn't seem like such a brilliant stroke regardless of what the people want in this case. If the democrats hold out for too long and the economy crashes before the bill is passed, it will look even worse for McCain, since it will look like he shattered the preexisting bipartisan agreement that could have helped pass it long before.Ether_Snake said:U.S. congressional negotiations on a proposed $700 billion financial industry bailout will enter a ninth day on Friday, with no sign that balking Republicans in the House of Representatives will participate.
This is what they want. To be seen as those who reject the bailout. And look at this snipet:
Paulson VS House Republican Plan.
Hello? Do you guys still think this won't go in McCain's favor? There are no indications of any "deregulation + taxcuts for companies" in there. All the info we have is Paulson doesn't want the House Republican version.
http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN2522338220080926?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0
tak said:The sad part about this whole thing is McCain is going to be asked why he didn't want to show up to the debate and he is going to have a response the majority of American's will think is good (I felt our country is more important then politics).
n1n9tean said:I just watched the Palin interview with Couric.
I'm literally at a loss for words.
All I can really say is that I watched it.
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
And so is our economy. Woohoo.OuterWorldVoice said:No. He is finished now.
This still boggles my mind.mj1108 said:Digg it: http://digg.com/politics/McCain_Bailout_Plan_More_Deregulation_Corporate_Tax_Breaks
Get that shit onto the front page.
Sharp said:Unless you don't think the bill is going to be passed at all, the best case scenario for McCain is that this buys him some time--maybe a week, tops--so why would he go for this move with the election still relatively far away? It doesn't seem like such a brilliant stroke regardless of what the people want in this case.
Yeah, I still think its political suicide to skip it.PhoenixDark said:I refuse to believe that McCain won't be at the debate
Right. What I meant was that long-term I don't see how this helps him. Palin had potential, but this really doesn't, since in the end the bill will pass anyway (with bipartisan approval, to boot) or it won't, the economy will crash pretty hard (at least in the short term) and people will blame McCain for postponing it.Ether_Snake said:Pelosi basically told Paulson it was up to him to accept or reject the House Republican version.
And why do this now? Because he just fell in the polls and Palin is a screw up.
Gaming is recession-proof. Though come to think of it it may not be Depression-proof.a Master Ninja said:NPDs for the rest of the year are going to be abysmal!
Gary Whitta said:He may be a nutcase, but I kinda dig Michael Savage's proposal that all the Wall Street CEOs asking for help should be compelled to put up all their personal assets as collateral against the $700bn loan.
Hmmm, food or games? Could be a tough call for some people here.Sharp said:Gaming is recession-proof. Though come to think of it it may not be Depression-proof.
Gary Whitta said:He may be a nutcase, but I kinda dig Michael Savage's proposal that all the Wall Street CEOs asking for help should be compelled to put up all their personal assets as collateral against the $700bn loan.
I think Savage's contingency here was to throw them all in jail. Sometimes you've just gotta love that crazy bastard.Tamanon said:Yah, they'd just quit. Never underestimate personal greed.
Ether_Snake said:They would quit.
Gary Whitta said:I think Savage's contingency here was to throw them all in jail. Sometimes you've just gotta love that crazy bastard.
hell. no.Gary Whitta said:I think Savage's contingency here was to throw them all in jail. Sometimes you've just gotta love that crazy bastard.
PhoenixDark said:I refuse to believe that McCain won't be at the debate
chaostrophy said:And why is that a problem? They've proven themselves to be completely incompetent and untrustworthy. You could take random inmates from any prison in the country, give them executive power over these companies, and they wouldn't screw things up as badly as the current finance crew has. They are utterly worthless people.
HamPster PamPster said:Remember the Should everyone in the world vote in US election thread
So... how much is the current situation effecting the rest of the world
Just asking :lol
Gary Whitta said:Hmmm, food or games? Could be a tough call for some people here.
Ether_Snake said:Then people would say if CEOs are forced to work to get a positive return they'll cook the books, lowering market confidence.
You can't have that and McCain vs. Bailout. The two are necessarily distinct, and while I may again be overestimating the average American I don't think they are going to swallow the two in succession one day apart.beermonkey@tehbias said:Really?
At this point I'd say the plan is to stonewall until Obama gets in his plane and then magically come up with a compromise and talk about how Obama put politics over a solution for the American people.
It is because Bush is predictable. He may fuck up a lot, but you know when he is going to fuck up and he never disappoints. McCain is just all over the map and it does a number on your heart burn.Cheebs said:Am I the only one starting to oddly like Bush more and more this week?
Bush's unusually calm demeanor and willingness to work with Democrats compared to John McCain's weird erratic stunts this week has left a very clear comparison of the two in my mind.
And the one on top is one 4 years ago I could never imagine myself saying.
Ether_Snake said:BTW I am pretty sure that if the bailout is postponed it's going to be interest rates cutting time again.
It's no wonder Pelosi is ready to let any bill pass now, she doesn't want to be the one left with the hot potato. The House Republicans proposed something they KNEW Paulson would refuse, and hence they knew he would come to Pelosi to get the bill through. She's not dumb, she won't let it pass unless the House Republicans are in as well. But that means letting them pass whatever they want.
Ether_Snake said:Because by quitting they would keep their money and not give a fuck about the company failing, so the plan to force them to put their salary/savings as collateral wouldn't apply to someone who's no longer CEO!
It's like what he said in 2004... you may not agree with his (idiotic) positions but at least you know where he stands.pxleyes said:It is because Bush is predictable. He may fuck up a lot, but you know when he is going to fuck up and he never disappoints. McCain is just all over the map and it does a number on your heart burn.
In some sort of odd way it has made him more appealing to McCain in my eyes.Diablos said:It's like what he said in 2004... you may not agree with his (idiotic) positions but at least you know where he stands.
Gary Whitta said:Hmmm, food or games? Could be a tough call for some people here.
Sharp said:Gaming is recession-proof. Though come to think of it it may not be Depression-proof.