What better controller for PS5 games than a dualsense? you can mock the design but for me I cant think of anything better if you want it as close to PS5 gaming as possible. And $300? where did you get that from?People just want better than a $300 streaming only device. The design of the thing really does look like they just slapped a dualsense on the ends of the thing.
A what now? 'native' PS5 games? on a handheld?Why not a Vita 2 that not only streams but is also a powerful kickass handheld that plays ps5 games?
So they should skip the psp 2?Gamers are begging for a psp 3, gaming deserves legitimate portables that provide AAA gaming on the go.
What are these responses? Project Q is happening and even though it's a half step towards true mobility for ps5 it's small progress.
Nowhere in the ops write up do they say it's gonna compete directly with switch or steam.
I get it. It's like ps TV which very few people bought. I have it and it was another half measure but I still liked it. It's either Q or a backbone for now. I don't get the negativity in this thread.
Say what you will about Krazy Ken, but his views on simultaneous compute turned out to be pretty solid - he was just way too early with CELL.I'm still in awe how Ken Kutaragi is written as some sort of tech prophet
Some people never go outsideDoesn't it require a PS5 to function? How could it compete with Switch due to that?
Doesn't it require a PS5 to function? How could it compete with Switch due to that?
Summary: PS plans to have a cloud presence in the next 11 years.
Isn't that all it does? I thought it could only broadcast from PS5 not independently.At present we know Q requires a PS5 for Remote Play, not to function.
Isn't that all it does? I thought it could only broadcast from PS5 not independently.
I see what you're saying, I just didn't pick up that was going to actually be so.If it can Remote Play from a PS5 in your home, it can remote play from a PS5 in a datacenter.
U mean that shitty android tablet with controllers attached was 18 years in the making lol, Sony dump it and start working on the vita 2 plz.
People just want better than a $300 streaming only device. The design of the thing really does look like they just slapped a dualsense on the ends of the thing.
Why not a Vita 2 that not only streams but is also a powerful kickass handheld that plays ps5 games?
I'm curious why people think Sony wouldn't just announce the thing as a cloud device, and instead say it's for remote play?
I'm still in awe how Ken Kutaragi is written as some sort of tech prophet
Schizoposting like the Charlie Day meme, but he called the redesigned PS3 OS/store before anyone else.Anybody here old enough to remember Jeff_Rigby? This thread reads like a Jeff_rigby fever dream
No one said otherwise.There's literally nothing stopping the Q from streaming from Datacenter-hosted PS5s other than a software update. Its just a thin-client screen with bare-minimum compute to run an OS an a controller strapped to it. All console manufacturers will have one of these by next gen. Xbox and Nintendo will probably (Nintendo definitely) go a step further and offer one with the compute built in to run low-intensity (indie/AA) games natively, and will cloud-stream the ones that cant run natively.