PS Store prices aren’t the same for everyone anymore — Sony experiments with dynamic pricing

I'm not a big fan of things like that. With Amazon and similar companies, I get annoyed every time they launch personalized promotions and I'm not included, or I get less than others, even though I'm a very good customer. You can also upset and lose customers with things like this.

But Sony already had something similar before - I remember getting a free month of Netflix at some point in the past.
 
Last edited:
Is the price ever going above the MSRP or are we only looking at who is getting more of a discount but nobody is paying more than MSRP?

That's exactly it. So in the future. If this snowballs.

guy who's a fan of the platform pays full price even though they earn less than another person who waits for games to be on sale but earns a load more money.
 
I would guess it would be a net positive for the seller overall, even if they ended up reducing the spend of some users, but hard to say for sure. It will be difficult for them to figure out from limited experiments, because the experiments will involve a clueless audience, which is not a situation they would enjoy for long if they fully deployed this system.
Bargaining has been a thing for centuries and somebody who went and did research on the price of things before heading out to a stall/store could haggle better. I guess it's going full circle and entering the new globalised and digital age again.

ABK (especially King) have been using AI to do personalised pricing/discounts for 6 years already and now it's hitting game prices (not just mtx). Which if you think about it already happens with regional game pricing anyway.

The thing is I normally research a sale price already and it's an annoying aspect of shopping. I check to see if it's the lowest it's ever been or if the sale is bogus (as in they increased the price 1 month ago to reduce it specifically for that sales event). The only way of making it easier is to fight fire with fire which is what's happening already. We need to collect data too independently. Which we do. Trackers like GG.deals and PSPrices can tell you if you're getting a good price on Steam or PSN and if you're not then simply refuse the deal until it's actually good for you.
 
Last edited:
If you guys didn't realise. PC is the future. If it survives this ram mess. Id buy one now and have next gen today.
What makes you believe this shit doesn't happen on PC?

That's exactly it. So in the future. If this snowballs.

guy who's a fan of the platform pays full price even though they earn less than another person who waits for games to be on sale but earns a load more money.

What do you think regional pricing is too? Somebody in Turkey is less willing to pay a high price than somebody in Italy. Let me set my prices accordingly. That's exactly what it is bar the tax difference. It's beneficial for the customer and seller in most cases. It's about price elasticity to increase sales not reduce it. Having the poor guy pay more would be nonsensical. It's the poor guy that is priced out that benefits.
 
Last edited:
Sony continues to show how shit of a company they've become yet their fanbase will continue to apologize for them.

I still have hope that one day the Console and PC gamers will come together and say enough of this bullshit from all these companies. We need all of them to Find out.
 
Sony continues to show how shit of a company they've become yet their fanbase will continue to apologize for them.

I still have hope that one day the Console and PC gamers will come together and say enough of this bullshit from all these companies. We need all of them to Find out.
Nothing shitty about offering discounts below MSRP.
 
Hopefully it DOESN'T take off.

For example:

Player 1 - Will 100% buy The Last of Us 8 Remastered for $80. No discount from Sony.
Player 2 - Has a history of not buying many 1st party titles, however, seems to enjoy that genre. Apply slight discount to push the person to buy it and enter the eco-system even more.

That's just an example, but no doubt it'll be something like that. It's just another way of Sony pushing people to lock into their eco-system.
What if they're testing to reduce prices permanently?
 
So many ppl in here mad when it doesnt it affect them
Why do you think it doesn't affect them? When any company does something shitty to extract more from their customers and get away with it, others copy. This is why pretty much everything is shittier for consumers than it was 5, 10, 20 years ago.

Dynamic pricing is shitty because there is a layer of information that companies are using against you that you have no control over and very little means to even understand. In 10 years we will probably have dynamic grocery prices that are determined by the distribution of people in the store at any given time. If you picked up a box of cereal at 11:24 AM it might be 6.99 when it was 6.50 at 9:30 AM because more well off housewives shop after all the kids are in school.
 
What is the final form of this? You didn't buy Concord and Goodbye Volcano High, please enjoy the games you actually want never get a discount higher than 10%, ever?
 
So many ppl in here mad when it doesnt it affect them
Not Yet No GIF


You realize that everyone will get it?
 
That's the thing though, if I know that system is in place then I'm now also considering the impact on my scrooge score whenever I buy something, not just the value proposition being presented. It may train people currently regularly paying full price to avoid doing that, for instance, if they feel they're going to be punished in the future for doing it / rewarded for not doing it.

I would guess it would be a net positive for the seller overall, even if they ended up reducing the spend of some users, but hard to say for sure. It will be difficult for them to figure out from limited experiments, because the experiments will involve a clueless audience, which is not a situation they would enjoy for long if they fully deployed this system.
I think there are more people who're waiting for deep sales than day 1 purchasers who would wait to reset a discount mechanic to save $20 or so.
 
Hopefully it DOESN'T take off.

For example:

Player 1 - Will 100% buy The Last of Us 8 Remastered for $80. No discount from Sony.
Player 2 - Has a history of not buying many 1st party titles, however, seems to enjoy that genre. Apply slight discount to push the person to buy it and enter the eco-system even more.

That's just an example, but no doubt it'll be something like that. It's just another way of Sony pushing people to lock into their eco-system.
There's nothing wrong with Sony offering discounts to get people to participate in their ecosystem. That's a legitimate way to acquire and retain customers. People rolling in FOMO who buy everything at full price on day 1 are already telling Sony that they are willing to pay whatever they charge, so why bother with offers for them?
 
And waiting for a sale for a product you're interested in like a responsible adult with a fully functional brain benefits you, not them.
You wait to serve the company?

Game X is not worth it at $1.45 per hour of entertainment.

Game X is not worth it at $1.23 per hour of entertainment.
 
You can set different prices in different parts of the EU, but what you aren't really supposed to be able to do legally is block someone from one part buying from another part. Whether they found ways around that idk.

Practices like offering different prices to different people based on their buying habits, or if they just canceled their sub, or left it in checkout etc. should all be outlawed.

Yep, typical regional pricing based on average income should be a thing, people in poorer countries would buy much more legal software that way (Central/Eastern Europe, Brazil and SA in general, SE Asia, India etc.).

This was a thing on Steam in Poland but motherfuckers changed it some years ago and now we have one of the most expensive games world wide...

But if this is about different prices for different users in the same region, fuck this shit.
 
The way Sony is moving this gen, I'm not sure I'll be purchasing the ps6 next gen. For the first time in a long time, i might just wait and see.

The way their game studios are making mostly trash games, the aggressive ps pricing just for online, this dynamic pricing nonsense….. As it stands, i barely use my ps5 rn. Other than to play gt7 once in a while, it just gathers dust.
 
Yep, typical regional pricing based on average income should be a thing, people in poorer countries would buy much more legal software that way (Central/Eastern Europe, Brazil and SA in general, SE Asia, India etc.).
This was a thing on Steam in Poland but motherfuckers changed it some years ago and now we have one of the most expensive games world wide...

But if this is about different prices for different users in the same region, fuck this shit.
The point of this is the exact same thing as regional pricing. To lower it for those priced out despite them not living in imaginary border lines which don't necessarily set their income. The price doesn't increase. It gets lower to get more sales from those who can't afford it just like regional pricing does. If you don't like regional pricing you should not like this, if you like regional pricing then you should like this too because it's the exact same thing. Its for sales and the regular MSRP will always be the MSRP.
 
Last edited:
Clearly an A/B test to test out whether more aggressive regional pricing would affect consumer behaviors.

Aggressive regional pricing is one of the reasons I end up choosing PC over PS for most 3P multiplats, so it makes sense that Sony would try and see what works and what doesn't.

No clue why people are getting agitated here.
 
If they do charge the fans more and will continue to do so, I'll consider buying Sony shares. Europe would be a good target region to massively increase prices.
 
The point of this is the exact same thing as regional pricing. To lower it for those priced out despite them not living in imaginary border lines which don't necessarily set their income. The price doesn't increase. It gets lower to get more sales from those who can't afford it just like regional pricing does. If you don't like regional pricing you should not like this, if you like regional pricing then you should like this too because it's the exact same thing. Its for sales and the regular MSRP will always be the MSRP.

How Sony will know what income individual people have?

With regional pricing you have solid data, compare Poland to Germany (2025):

Minimum income: Germany - €2,222 per month; Poland - ~€1,100 per month
Average income: Germany - €4,323 per month; Poland - ~€2,070 per month

Those "imaginary borders" makes a big difference. Most things are cheaper in Poland compared to Germany but console and game prices are very close or even higher (sometimes) in Poland:

1ol3MXiq0GYZ3GzW.jpg
LnrnrE0Ct9SNnw1K.jpg

JexyvO8LtyKYOPtV.jpg


Pretty much the same price... And there are much more extreme examples of that (Brazil mentioned before). Regional pricing would allow them to sell more copies/licenses.
 
I assume if there was a significantly lower price for a digital game in one EU member, everyone in the EU would just buy from there?
 
I assume if there was a significantly lower price for a digital game in one EU member, everyone in the EU would just buy from there?

Yeah, people (at least) would try to do that. But with enough region locks this may end up very inconvenient.

Turkey had (or still has?) lower prices on PSN, there were super cheap Turkish PS+ accounts circulating some time ago on Allegro (it's like Ebay). Now it's all banned. Same thing with Russian Steam accounts for cheap games.
 
How Sony will know what income individual people have?

With regional pricing you have solid data, compare Poland to Germany (2025):

Minimum income: Germany - €2,222 per month; Poland - ~€1,100 per month
Average income: Germany - €4,323 per month; Poland - ~€2,070 per month

Those "imaginary borders" makes a big difference. Most things are cheaper in Poland compared to Germany but console and game prices are very close or even higher (sometimes) in Poland:
The lines in Europe are more imaginary than most places. The averages are only based on where rich people have chosen to go (as I said bar things like taxes). Even in London you have those in Kensington and Chelsea with a median salary of £199,300, while in Barking and Dagenham, the median is £59,600. Would different pricing based on location in London be OK based on this data of imaginary lines?

They don't need to know your income they can know whether you refuse to buy a product you like based on its price because you have been priced out. That's what price elasticity is. Ronaldo is less likely to look at a €70 price tag and refuse to buy it than Timmy working in the coal mines. That's based on the assumption that timmy is financially responsible with his money, which unfortunately isn't always true. Now timmy doesn't need to worry because he was born in a "rich country" even if his salary is shite nor does he need to use VPNs to pretend he's from a poor one.
 
Last edited:
Is this a bad thing? Are people mad because they think it's not fair?
It's actually more fair if they go by local currency rates.
 
Regional pricing would be absolutely genius if they implement it. Its what keeps steam more popular than any other launcher or key reseller

The cost of switch 2 and its games here are laughable and exactly why literally no one i know here has bought one
 
Top Bottom