Chrange said:True, but you don't have to play the game - hence it's 'optional'
>> Please be assured that SCE is committed to continue
>> the support for previously sold models that have the
>> Install Other OS feature and that this feature will
>> not be disabled in future firmware releases.
Dragona Akehi said:The way D_A inserted his own code into Sony's official Firmware isn't illegal because you are able to download it yourself from Sony's website in order to update your system via USB stick, whereas with the 360 DVD firmware hack, there is no legitimate method of obtaining that code.
He created a PSAR dumper so you could collect your own POPS prx files so you could use his POPStation loader in order to pick which verison of POPS to use, they were never provided.
All Wii hardware hacks from Team Twiizers use their own code, reverse engineered from what they've observed on the Wii. No Nintendo code was used, (even if the vehicle of their hacking was a copy of TP, the user must legally obtain it for the hack to work).
The latest 360 hack, the JTAG method is a legit reverse engineered hack. The DVD firmware hack, however, was not.
racerx said:Help me understand. So, if you can download the software, you can modify it for your own use and spread it around?
DCharlie said:yup, SACD was removed from the Slim as a hardware update, fatties still have it.
I really like SACD , i just wish there was more stuff available
racerx said:I don't want to play on a compromised network, so for the sake of consumer protection, sony needs to everything in it's ability to make sure the ps3 doesn't get hacked.
Not all fatties, just 40GB and newer. See the posts above yours.
Of course, but if I see a 3.22 update with some of these modifications, I won't say "I called it!", I promise.patsu said:They're all made up by you isn't it ? ^_^
You put yourself in danger by using a GET field in the HTTP request to send the query to fill a page, by using Internet Explorer 6 (the worst browser still available in the market), or even by turning your car on without checking if your brakes are working.patsu said:Yes, Google probably deserved to be hacked too. The truth is: there are simple and sophisticated attacks.
Dragona Akehi said:The software which is free to download and use as mandated by Sony. It isn't locked up in Fort Knox. It's meant for End Users to use. Yes. That's a significant difference.
When the End User takes that freely given code and alters it, it is in the End User's hands for fair use.
racerx said:There must be something I'm not understanding. According to what you said, I can grab software that is freely downloadable, modify it and give it to others.
That just doesn't seem kosher.
Anyways, back to the dvd firmware argument. I'm pretty sure there are some of those that don't have any microsoft code and MS is needlessly, without proof, banning people.
Dragona Akehi said:There should be an appeal process for something like that, because even one consumer's rights outweigh the right of a corporation's.
Chrange said:Not anymore, in the US at least. They're one amendment away from being able to vote :lol
2.0/5.1 analog > HDMI for SACD playback anyway.Quasar said:I'm still angry about that. I've had to go back to using my DVD player which annoyingly only passes 5.1 audio through the analog outputs.
What?! They both sound the same to me.Dragona Akehi said:You can't take code, modify it and give it to others.
You can however, write code that can modify other code, should that End User have a legal right to that code.
Dragona Akehi said:As for the console bannings, of course it's wrong for MS to ban people without proof. Anyone suggesting that I say otherwise is dead wrong. There should be an appeal process for something like that, because even one consumer's rights outweigh the right of a corporation's.
ReyBrujo said:Of course, but if I see a 3.22 update with some of these modifications, I won't say "I called it!", I promise.
My point is, Google didn't quit because of a hack, because the hack affected hundreds of other companies as well and they didn't all quit China. It is comparing oranges to apples, in one situation you have a whole political and ethical background (the "Don't do evil" mantra with the censorship imposed by the government) and in the other you have a hacker wanting to explore what his PS3 can do.
If you read the thread you'll see people care.tass0 said:Does anyone actually care? I had my PS3 for three years and I never used the feature...
racerx said:What?! They both sound the same to me.
Well, I'd have to side with MS here. The Xbox live is their network, they reserve the right to let you in or not. It's probably in their TOS.
Dragona Akehi said:I figure Geohot is closer to getting my blurays to play than Sony is. He's had less than three months, whereas Sony's had over a year by the time this new firmware is out.
sankt-Antonio said:if it bothers you that fucking much... how about buying a standalone bd player?
in every thread about ps3 firmware your on this mission to get your two bd's working... sell the ps3, buy a bd player... be happy once and for all...
it needs an apocalyps3 to get sony to do something and not you whining in every god damn thread as nobody else seems to have the problem.
hope you can handle some criticism
----
on topic: i used ubuntu on the ps3, was bad as hell. dont care anymore about it
Corporations voting? What's the point in that? Corporations already have far more influence over an election than any measly 'vote' every would.Chrange said:Not anymore, in the US at least. They're one amendment away from being able to vote :lol
Azerach said:http://geohotps3.blogspot.com/2010/03/custom-themes.html#disqus_thread
some quality comments here :lol
:lolAzerach said:http://geohotps3.blogspot.com/2010/03/custom-themes.html#disqus_thread
some quality comments here :lol
Dragona Akehi said:Not two blurays. More like ten. One is even Region A, just like the PS3.
Why should I spend more money on what should be a redundant device? Especially when the PS3 I bought with the intention of playing blurays previously played these discs just fine before a fuck up on Sony's end? Really?
If I had the money laying about you'd bet your ass I'd buy myself an Oppo BD-83. But I don't.
sankt-Antonio said:well, that is reality right there, i`m not telling you that its okay what happened, but i tell you that you can crab these bds and put them in your garbage bin... sony`s not going to fix it, as they don`t see bd playback on the os3 as faulty... that sucks, but damn sometimes you either vote with your wallet or swallow the crap they serve you...
oh and on the other thing you said, that its not illegal to run your own code on ps3...
if you run code, this code need sonys approval, its not illegal by the law (like us law) but by the therms of use (of the ps3)...
its not an open system. you cant choose what to do with it -
Dragona Akehi said:EULAs are neither legal nor enforceable. An end user is allowed to use/modify/alter their purchased hardware or software as they see fit.
Combichristoffersen said:Really? I'd always been under the impression that an EULA was a legally binding agreement you had to accept for you to be allowed to use the software/hardware/whatever, and you weren't legally allowed to alter the software/hardware.
.Dragona Akehi said:That's a pretty bullshit response. What if they decided they shouldn't bother fixing a problem with PSN that only 0.01% of the PS3 population used?
uh.. yes, as this is what all companys do, failure rate of any given product is much higher than 0,01% - they dont care because they know that 2-3% of ps3s are broken when they hit a shop to get sold.
EULAs are neither legal nor enforceable. An end user is allowed to use/modify/alter their purchased hardware or software as they see fit.
uhm..no you cant change a lot of hardware as you see fit, cars/electric meter/etc.
or your online bank account... because you would fuck people over and get in jail
and i can only speak about EU law, here the EULA is legal and enforceable- BUT not all of it or even most of it,(parts that clash with consumer rights are not!) but now if you can find a link that says that modifying hard/software is a consumer right - ill bow down
Dragona Akehi said:Did you tell Hillary to fuck himself for climbing Everest? It was there, too, you know.
If someone was blatantly using cheat codes with custom firmware on their ps3 on an online game. They would get banned for sure.KongRudi said:This is a necesarily a bad thing...
Here is an example how few people running unsigned code on a system can easily ruin the game for everyone:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTBempZVKQg
See that, flying soldier, and invincible soldier, running twice as fast, and unlimited ammo, playing online in Killzone: Liberation on PSP.
If Custom Firmware came to PS3, I'm pretty sure that this trainer (or similar hacks) would be ported to PS3, for the most popular titles there, just as it is on PSP.
Wow!!! I could have use emulators and roms on my 40 gig???Schrade said:This is completely fucked up. I'm pissed.
I use OtherOS to boot from a USB stick (Yes, you can boot from a USB stick) to play SDLMAME and other emulators. All with Bluetooth controller support and everything. It also has Firefox on it and stuff.
Fuck Sony for doing this shit. I hope someone hacks the hell out of the system soon.
Bastards.
This is like the fuckers putting the FBI notices and unskippable shit on DVDs and Blu-rays forcing legitimate users to suffer their idiocy.
And you people cheering them on, quit being so callous to those of us who DO use the feature. Fersis, you're making me dislike you >8-|
B1gg_Randall said:Wow!!! I could have use emulators and roms on my 40 gig???
Then Sony should pull all the games you never played off the shelf. Since you didn't bother with them, there's no point for anyone else to play them.tass0 said:Does anyone actually care? I had my PS3 for three years and I never used the feature...
lol I knew that but to play with them on my Ps3 would blown my mind more :lolsankt-Antonio said:or you know...you could have use them ...on.... YOUR...PC!!!!!
now i blew your mind....
who ever bought a ps3 to play emulators did it wrong,
PC=>TV=>funtime
Speevy said:But although I'm not anti-consumer, I do wish for the PS3 to get through its entire existence without a single Blu-Ray game being burned and played on it.
Aaron said:Then Sony should pull all the games you never played off the shelf. Since you didn't bother with them, there's no point for anyone else to play them.