Duane Cunningham
Member
It's a great post, and it's definitely a good idea for anyone seeking to label Rey thusly to reconsider, especially if you coincidentally happen to not like her character, citing "Mary Sueness" as why.
This excerpt from the trope's Wikipedia page always stood out to me in stark terms:
This is a case where a specific angle of criticism has been relied upon so hard that it begins to feed back and actually have a negative impact on the development of content itself. If an author has in mind, "boy, I better not make this character a Mary Sue" the character will almost undoubtedly suffer for it no matter which way the "problem" is addressed. It's easy for me to extrapolate the relationship this concept has with the dearth of heroic female protagonists in popular fiction.
A related and very important point is that pop conventional wisdom has at some point in the recent past begun to equate "tropes" with "mistakes."
This is to say that people watch movies with the idea in mind that they should be hunting for tropes- the more tropes they find, the worse the movie! This is part of why I find the whole M.O. of CinemaSins to be so joyless. Not only is this exercise fruitless- about as compelling as someone commenting on the quality of a meal based on how many ingredients they'd heard of in the recipe- it ignores the extremely strong, relevant reasons that tropes came to be in the first place. They're devices; tools used in service of story. In isolation they can be good or bad, but void of context they are are neither.
Good post, Hawk. Yeah, no writer should be paranoid anyway, because even if they DO create a "Mary Sue" (by whoever's standards), it doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad character, or a bad story or anything else.
Hell, TV Tropes has an entry specifically called "Tropes Are Not Bad" pointing out exactly that... using an existing, even common, character archetype or plot device or setting etc doesn't
ruin the work. In fact sometimes some of the most brilliantly written things rely on using a lot of familiar elements but then giving them some unexpected small twist or subversion.