Vicetrailia
Member
A bunch of dumbasses at the GOP.
At this point you move forward and improve security.
At this point you move forward and improve security.
Poor memeage, the senate appoints justices. Better would be references to gun legislation.
Will they have impeachment papers drawn up on her first day?
This is fucking disgusting.
I'm not even speaking as a Clinton supporter. I am just continuously amazed and disgusted at the amount of time, energy, and MONEY the GOP Congress is willing to waste hunting after Hillary Clinton.
We just had the largest mass shooting in the history of our country, and who knows for how long it'll be the largest because our Congress REFUSES to do a damn thing about it. REFUSES to actually seriously entertain legislation to address the fact that a murderous asshole can go out and buy a mass killing machine just as easily as I can buy some fleet for the weekend. But oh wait! UNLIMITED FUNDS because we have another done-and-dusted Clinton "scandal" to drag through the mud for as long as humanly possible.
This is the country we live in.
So yeah get ready for 8 years of impeachment attempts.
They are not going to win in November so they really have nothing else to do but you know, witch-hunts.
It's obvious the Goverment is going to protect Clinton, so why bother dragging this through the mud anymore than it has been? To get the same results? More people let down? I rather them spend the time to find a way to prevent trump from moving on past the convention.
So yeah, Clinton lied. She's been lying about it for the past year. I can understand why people are mad at that. This election sucks man, I don't like Clinton but I will have to vote for her anyway because Trump is far worse. Republicans have such a good chance this year but they continue to blow it year after year with the geezer McCain (and that idiot Palin), noted out-of-touch flip-flopping rich guy with binders full of women Mitt Romney, and now Trump, who is the worst one of the bunch in the year that the difficult-to-like Clinton is the Democratic nominee.
What are your thoughts on David Petraeus?
I'm really curious to hear them.
3/10/2015: "I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email...There is no classified material."
8/18/2015: “Whether it was a personal account or a government account, I did not send classified material,and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified, which is the way you know whether something is.”
Just two days ago, 7/3/2016: "“Let me just repeat what I have repeated for many months now. I never received nor sent any material that was marked classified.”
Today, Comey unequivocally said that 113 of Clinton's emails contained classified information at the time they were sent or received.
Are they this afraid of Clinton?
I mean with all the shit they've pulled off, I'm sure she's gonna make their life miserable once she wins the presidency.
Or she should, anyway.
Hurting Clinton by keeping this in the news.So what's the angle here? It can't be personal bias because Comey is a Republican and it can't be professional because Comey is a respected career professional and has no past issues. So what's their angle here?
So what's the angle here? It can't be personal bias because Comey is a Republican and it can't be professional because Comey is a respected career professional and has no past issues. So what's their angle here?
I have no idea what the GOP is thinking. They must be in a desperate freefall mode, because I don't know how they think that a scandal that the American public doesn't care about is something they should be focusing on. It's ultimately going to mark them as people who responded to something no one asked them to do by throwing more and more money at it, all the while disregarding things that the American public is asking them to do, as a majority of the population, such as doing the first thing to move us towards having sensible gun control.
Contained classified information, or were marked "Classified"?
Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
So what's the angle here? It can't be personal bias because Comey is a Republican and it can't be professional because Comey is a respected career professional and has no past issues. So what's their angle here?
This fucking country is a complete shit show.
No, she didn't lie. As far as I know, the entirety of the disparity is just a part of the long-running feud between the State Department and the FBI over what should be considered classified and what shouldn't. The FBI thinks that a lot of discussions should be called classified which State does not. It's a part of the FBI's "we need to classify way more stuff than makes legitimate sense" tendencies.3/10/2015: "I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email...There is no classified material."
8/18/2015: “Whether it was a personal account or a government account, I did not send classified material,and I did not receive any material that was marked or designated classified, which is the way you know whether something is.”
Just two days ago, 7/3/2016: "“Let me just repeat what I have repeated for many months now. I never received nor sent any material that was marked classified.”
Today, Comey unequivocally said that 113 of Clinton's emails contained classified information at the time they were sent or received.
So yeah, Clinton lied. She's been lying about it for the past year.
So is the House of Representatives going to impeach Hillary Clinton in 2017 if she wins the Presidency?
No, she didn't lie. As far as I know, the entirety of the disparity is just a part of the long-running feud between the State Department and the FBI over what should be considered classified and what shouldn't. The FBI thinks that a lot of discussions should be called classified which State does not. It's a part of the FBI's "we need to classify way more stuff than makes legitimate sense" tendencies.
The key issue here is not about whether she "lied" or not, but about the differences between State and the FBI's definitions of what classified should mean. And I think the FBI goes too far -- discussions of news reports of drone attacks in Pakistan should be marked as classified, seriously? Oh come on.
No, she didn't lie. As far as I know, the entirety of the disparity is just a part of the long-running feud between the State Department and the FBI over what should be considered classified and what shouldn't. The FBI thinks that a lot of discussions should be called classified which State does not. It's a part of the FBI's "we need to classify way more stuff than makes legitimate sense" tendencies.
The key issue here is not about whether she "lied" or not, but about the differences between State and the FBI's definitions of what classified should mean. And I think the FBI goes too far -- discussions of news reports of drone attacks in Pakistan should be marked as classified, seriously? Oh come on.
Comey hung himself by speaking, especially his "no reasonable prosecutor" line. Republicans in Congress will wheel out a dozen witness prosecutors who say they'd indict Hillary and it will be a win for Republicans.
GOP got more probes than NASA
adamsappel;209265934 Contained classified information said:Not to defend what's going on here but that's semantics. From my limited experience doing contracting for military systems they are very serious about separation of classified materials. I've seen contractors fired for failing to report an incident of improperly labeled materials being sent on the wrong network.
At the last place I contracted for there was a lengthy process for reviewing these incidents as well to evaluate how much damage was done by information flowing where it shouldn't.
Shit can be very stressful and I'm glad I don't deal with it even in the limited capacity that I did anymore.
She may not have lied there but I would find it hard to believe that anyone in the know would not understand what materials are classified and what are not regardless of label when you are at that level of the power.
That said I think this witch hunt has gone on way too long and I imagine members of Congress and the Senate (or anyone within the government with sufficient power) does similar things with classified materials and at most gets a slap on the wrist.