it's a weird thing that we're assuming the worst of somebody based on superficial wares. if a guy like robin williams walked in there with that shirt, would the reactions be similar?
i need to vape weeds now.
Still, Taylor's personal apology doesn't make up for the fact that no one at ESA saw fit to stop him from representing the Space community with clothing that demeans 50 percent of the world's population. No one asked him to take it off, because presumably they didn't think about it. It wasn't worth worrying about.
yeah, context is that his female friend gave it to him and he is a geek and is wearing it.
Not that he is trying to objectify women.
The problem is that the apology was bullied out of himMan, people in this thread are fucking mad that a guy learned a lesson.
He apologized and realized it was wrong and people are weirdly pissed about it. The guy is a shining example of how people should be. We should all be that willing to be open to real criticism.
i think he's sorry he had to be sorry, but we'll probably never know
The problem is that the apology was bullied out of him
Man, people in this thread are fucking mad that a guy learned a lesson.
He apologized and realized it was wrong and people are weirdly pissed about it. The guy is a shining example of how people should be. We should all be that willing to be open to real criticism.
So we just jump to him being an insincere liar instead of a dude who maybe made a mistake?
You're not doing him any service by painting his intentions and words as what you wish he'd said instead of what he said.
Man, people in this thread are fucking mad that a guy learned a lesson.
He apologized and realized it was wrong and people are weirdly pissed about it. The guy is a shining example of how people should be. We should all be that willing to be open to real criticism.
Things have unintended consequences. We don't exist in a vacuum.
I'm offended by your use of a person who murders people for sport. Please apologize to me.
That's about the level of wrongness he's at.
And a big fucking LOL to the people who say "HE WAS A PART OF A HUGE AWESOME THING" as if that excuses him from criticism.
i guess my next question would be : who's in charge of pressing the button that declares something demeaning to 50% of the world's population?
This. Dude actually acknowledged that his shirt was offensive, did the right thing and apologized, and people are upset that he did this?
And a big fucking LOL to the people who say "HE WAS A PART OF A HUGE AWESOME THING" as if that excuses him from criticism.
Shouldn't be surprising at this point. People don't get it. That's why the problem is so hard to solve.Man, people in this thread are fucking mad that a guy learned a lesson.
He apologized and realized it was wrong and people are weirdly pissed about it. The guy is a shining example of how people should be. We should all be that willing to be open to real criticism.
Things have unintended consequences. We don't exist in a vacuum.
What I'm saying is that he might have felt coerced to do it. An apology that was gained through harassment is kind of tainted, don't you think?So he isn't at all sincerely sorry that he maybe offended some people? This is pure cowardice on his part?
Unless there's a severe deficit of one kind of person on Gaf because they have never been encouraged to post here because they weren't inclined enough or weren't smart enough to post at a place where people with Mortal Kombat usernames posted, you're being insincere and intentionally dull about what the conversation is here.
Probably not the opposite 50%
I don't care if you landed a spacecraft on a comet, your shirt is sexist and ostracizing
By Chris Plante
Maybe there are, but I have no idea of measuring that since they are not here.
He didn't do anything "wrong" he just had the misfortune of having bad taste on a public stage, and that's nothing you should be forced to apologize for.
Maybe there are, but I have no idea of measuring that since they are not here.
He didn't do anything "wrong" he just had the misfortune of having bad taste on a public stage, and that's nothing you should be forced to apologize for.
How was he "forced" to apologize?
IT'S A SHIRT. It's not a statement.His "bad taste" is not the issue. The shirt, and the fact wearing it didn't seem like a problem, are indicators of a larger problem in society regarding gender.
Maybe there are, but I have no idea of measuring that since they are not here.
He didn't do anything "wrong" he just had the misfortune of having bad taste on a public stage, and that's nothing you should be forced to apologize for.
What I'm saying is that he might have felt coerced to do it. An apology that was gained through harassment is kind of tainted, don't you think?
This. Dude actually acknowledged that his shirt was offensive, did the right thing and apologized, and people are upset that he did this?
And a big fucking LOL to the people who say "HE WAS A PART OF A HUGE AWESOME THING" as if that excuses him from criticism.
Oh. Is that what you're saying I'm doing?You're outright dismissing because you assume there is more to it than the man just wanting to write about this.
Unless there's a severe deficit of one kind of person on Gaf because they have never been encouraged to post here because they weren't inclined enough or weren't smart enough to post at a place where people with Mortal Kombat usernames posted, you're being insincere and intentionally dull about what the conversation is here.
Ah ,yes, being coerced makes you a coward. Way to put words into my mouth. At least we know how you view itMaybe he felt that wearing the shirt actually did a tiny bit of harm. I don't know why the people who seem to want to defend the guy want to also make him into an insincere coward.
Try reading the thread.
Kind of feel like this is what should have happened:
"Hey, that shirt isn't really appropriate, do you mind changing it?"
"Ok."
Boom, done. Crisis avoided.
I can't imagine why you're trying to get in on the conversation when you have no real interest in being sincere or even lucid.
Maybe he felt that wearing the shirt actually did a tiny bit of harm. I don't know why the people who seem to want to defend the guy want to also make him into an insincere coward.
I do not think it would be totally weird that some women might feel unsafe with images that are associated with brutalizing women in insanely violent ways.
Ah ,yes, being coerced makes you a coward. Way to put words into my mouth
Ah ,yes, being coerced makes you a coward. Way to put words into my mouth. At least we know how you view it
I'm completely disgusted by how this person was treated over a shirt.
It's a fucking tacky ass shirt.
I agree 100%. Who has an avatar like that?
What I was saying in my post is that it's possible that he felt like he had to do it. Again, an apology that is gained through harassment feels tainted. Do you disagree with that?What evidence do you have the apology wasn't sincere beyond the personal belief it wasn't necessary?
You've said very clearly that being coerced into an apology would make someone a coward.I've said nothing other than I believe the guy was sincere and meant what he said.
I can't imagine why you're trying to get in on the conversation when you have no real interest in being sincere or even lucid.
Maybe he felt that wearing the shirt actually did a tiny bit of harm. I don't know why the people who seem to want to defend the guy want to also make him into an insincere coward.
I'm completely disgusted by how this person was treated over a shirt.
You've said very clearly that being coerced into an apology would make you a coward.
I know you tease but just like this dude's tshirt it is harmless and doesn't represent his character or world view.
i guess my next question would be : who's in charge of pressing the button that declares something demeaning to 50% of the world's population?
Some people may see Taylors dress as harmless or eccentric. For example, the UK newspaper, the Daily Mail, basically calls Taylor a rockstar, highlighting public comments on his tattoos and his wild dress sense. Erin Brodwin, journalist with The Business Insider science column, however, was not having any of that nonsense. Brodwin focused solely on the issue of sexism, noting that Taylor had recently answered questions on his acceptance as a scientist despite his tattoos. Taylor said then: The people I work with dont judge me by my looks but only by the work I have done and can do. Simple. Brodwin notes with irony: If only women could hope to someday be judged that way too.
Analytical Chemist Dr Raychelle Burks noted that a prominent scientist appearing before the worlds media might have chosen a different shirt to make a statement about STEM. If he wanted to appear with a woman on his shirt, why not try Ada Lovelace? Or any other prominent woman in astronomy and astrophysics whose fight for inclusion reshaped space history? Instead of celebrating STEM at this momentous event, women are reminded of our objectification and exclusion.
This matters on many levels: it matters because of the uphill battle we face in STEM fields trying to get everyone to understand that sexism in STEM is an issue that affects us all. It matters because girls are continually told that STEM is not for them. It matters because people want to find excuses for the under-representation of girls and women, rather than focusing on solutions.
Some people on social media are under-playing this incident, telling women scientists to stop spoiling the achievement with feminist discussions. One woman tweets at astronomy Professor Jennifer Hoffman, "We've officially all become prudes." Another man accuses feminism for bumming out a momentous feat. Professor Hoffman argues this is not about prudishness, it's about professional respect of women colleagues:
.@weswt @missafayres Am I serious about being respected by colleagues in my professional environment? Uh, yes. #shirtstorm
Jennifer L. Hoffman (@astroprofhoff) November 13, 2014
The reason why some people are under-playing the significance of Taylors choice of shirt goes to the heart of the way in which sexism works. Sexism is not simply maintained through active harassment and discrimination. It thrives because of deeply held values that go unexamined.
On our blog post, we pay special attention to how men can help reduce the burden on women in STEM, by actively challenging sexism in professional settings. This includes calling out the lack of awareness and bias of colleagues which objectify, denigrate and otherwise make women feel excluded from science. Sexism is more than insults and physical harassment. Sexism describes the culture, organisational patterns and other practices that perpetuate inequality. The things that we say and do, whether conscious or otherwise, are connected to broader patterns of gender inequality. This is known as everyday sexism - the types of social interaction that reinforce women's lesser status at work and in wider society. This #ShirtStorm incident allows us to see how everyday actions are connected to institutional sexism; that is, the organisational and policy barriers that women face throughout their education and careers. To learn more about how this incident helps us to better understand both everyday and institutional sexism in STEM, and how you and your organisation can help address the exclusion of women, keep reading on the Stem Women website.