thestopsign
Member
Guys, how is this going to effect the MetaCritic rating?!
DCharlie said:Not a single person in to Zelda is going to tolerate a negative review so i have to ask (AGAIN)
why on earth do any of you give a FLYING FUCK!?
you've already decided - some of you before playing the fucking game - so why put any weight behind ANY of the reviews?!
just man the fuck up and admit you're looking for verification of your opinions, grow up, learn to not give a shit, and move on.
Thunder Monkey said:I will never shop at GameSpot again.
...
They have a store?!
walking fiend said:Well, do you want us to give a review credit that:
1. Has had a review copy probably for a long time, but delays the review because he hadn't finished the game?
2. Has factual error
3. Gives the lowest score game received
4. Gives this score after all major reviews are out.
5. Also has spoilers (don't know what this one has got to do with this lol, but reviews aren't supposed to have spoilers specially when the game isn't out yet)
rant about japanese honor and demanding GameSpot apologize?Thunder Monkey said:So... what do I have to say to get included on someones list?
Just think of it like this.CoffeeJanitor said:I guess, maybe people here don't want to be made an example of.
Who the fuck cares, maybe they didn't like it. It's someone's opinion, man, it shouldn't make you angry.
And giving a lower score does not mean they're trolling for hits. Actually I guess people here maybe do want to be made an example of?
And your attempt to discredit people who you think attempt to discredit the review is what? Rational discussion distanced from the meltdowns? If people don't care about a review for whatever reason they have a right to state it and it doesn't imply it's all about Zelda love. Maybe they still have no reason to believe things changed since the Gerstmann debacle, or whatever else made them stop caring about this particular outlet. Unless you can point to the same people praising the same outlet when they rated a game they liked better. I didn't see you making a list of people attempting to discredit the positive reviews as meltdowns on the other end of the scale either. I mean, your quotes even include someone who said nothing of the review and just said he doesn't visit the website, but did this time and hates the design or whatever. Lol? I never visit GS (or any of the major outlets) either, how am I trying to discredit the review by mentioning this? To me, you seem more invested in this than most of those guys.Crunched said:There's less anger here and more a directed attempt to discredit his review.
Wow.Massa said:They actually do.
DCharlie said:Not a single person in to Zelda is going to tolerate a negative review so i have to ask (AGAIN)
why on earth do any of you give a FLYING FUCK!?
No.perfectchaos007 said:Strong emotional feelings and personal convictions aside, does anyone think Gamespot gave the score they did to increase publicity? I mean, they know what 8.8 did for buzz so who knows
I'm convinced that people like this just flat-out don't care for the series. And there's nothing inherently wrong with that.Even with many bright spots, Skyward Sword still feels like a nostalgic retread. Those yearning for something new will be disappointed, but anyone thirsty for another exciting adventure will find plenty to enjoy here.
As I said, they had enough time to play Skyrim.JaseC said:Should he have instead written and presented his review without completing the game?
Okay. They weren't after hits.walking fiend said:Just think of it like this.
They have had time to play Skyrim to give out a review exactly as the embargo end, but didn't have time to finish Zelda, and decide to put the lowest score after everyone? You tell me if they weren't after hits...
walking fiend said:As I said, they had enough time to play Skyrim.
Are you telling me it takes longer to play Zelda that it takes to play Skyrim for giving it a proper review?
JaseC said:Should he have instead written and presented his review without completing the game?
It's a REVIEWS thread where people discuss REVIEWS.
Don't harp on people for discussing it though in a review thread.
You would rather they have rushed out the SS review with a higher score?walking fiend said:Just think of it like this.
They have had time to play Skyrim to give out a review exactly as the embargo end, but didn't have time to finish Zelda, and decide to put the lowest score after everyone? You tell me if they weren't after hits...
I am not angry at the review, I won't read it at least until I finish the game, since it seems to have spoilers; but this is a very shitty move nonetheless. I wouldn't care this much if they gave this same exact score, but not now that every other review is out.
While there are definetly some obnoxious posts in there. I don't see anything wrong in some of them disagreeing with the reviewer.Crunched said:It's not too bad right now, but here's the list:
There's less anger here and more a directed attempt to discredit his review.
walking fiend said:Well, do you want us to give a review credit that:
1. Has had a review copy probably for a long time, but delays the review because he hadn't finished the game?
DCharlie said:disagreed. it's a SQUABBLE FEST for the TERMINALLY INSECURE.
DCharlie said:disagreed. it's a SQUABBLE FEST for the TERMINALLY INSECURE.
Sleep with one eye open my friendGigglepoo said:Hey, GS reviewer here. Two quick things while I walk home. 1 - I love Zelda games (which is why I reviewed this) and did enjoy SS despite its flaws. 2 - Sorry for any spoilers. I tried not to give anything major away but I do have to point out specific things if I'm going to properly critique.
Thanks for not making fun of my weight!
Gigglepoo said:Hey, GS reviewer here. Two quick things while I walk home. 1 - I love Zelda games (which is why I reviewed this) and did enjoy SS despite its flaws. 2 - Sorry for any spoilers. I tried not to give anything major away but I do have to point out specific things if I'm going to properly critique.
Thanks for not making fun of my weight!
Meier said:I don't know how anyone can take the Gamespot review seriously. Movie fans will know the name Armond White. This dude seems like he wants to be his equivalent.
walking fiend said:As I said, they had enough time to play Skyrim.
Are you telling me it takes longer to play Zelda that it takes to play Skyrim for giving it a proper review?
BY2K said:Isn't that the guy who gave Toy Story 3 a bad review?
Gigglepoo said:Hey, GS reviewer here. Two quick things while I walk home. 1 - I love Zelda games (which is why I reviewed this) and did enjoy SS despite its flaws. 2 - Sorry for any spoilers. I tried not to give anything major away but I do have to point out specific things if I'm going to properly critique.
this made me lol.AniHawk said:say you will never shop at gamespot again
DCharlie said:disagreed. it's a SQUABBLE FEST for the TERMINALLY INSECURE.
Is 7.5 lower than B+? I'm not sure. Can we get a 1UP expert in here to give us an analysis?walking fiend said:3. Gives the lowest score game received
did they rush out through Skyrim?CoffeeJanitor said:You would rather they have rushed out the SS review with a higher score?
Will you be back at all to answer some questions? (though I guess if you answer this, then the answer will be yes, haha)Gigglepoo said:Hey, GS reviewer here. Two quick things while I walk home. 1 - I love Zelda games (which is why I reviewed this) and did enjoy SS despite its flaws. 2 - Sorry for any spoilers. I tried not to give anything major away but I do have to point out specific things if I'm going to properly critique.
Thanks for not making fun of my weight!
GameStop, stilly.EmCeeGramr said:Okay. They weren't after hits.
Who is "they"
Divvy said:Your BMI could be closer to the standard set by the heart and stroke administration!
Gigglepoo said:Hey, GS reviewer here. Two quick things while I walk home. 1 - I love Zelda games (which is why I reviewed this) and did enjoy SS despite its flaws. 2 - Sorry for any spoilers. I tried not to give anything major away but I do have to point out specific things if I'm going to properly critique.
Thanks for not making fun of my weight!
you seem to be the most emotionally invested person atm![]()
DCharlie said:disagreed. it's a SQUABBLE FEST for the TERMINALLY INSECURE.
WHO ARE "THEY"walking fiend said:did they rush out through Skyrim?
Just think of it like this:
'EVERY' major website gets to finish the game in time, GS, which is probably the biggest one after IGN, doesn't have time to finish Skyward Sword in time.
Yeah, it was a fine review. I just find it hard to believe that the outcry (read: attention) over Uncharted 3's 8/10 and Twilight Princess' 8.8 didn't have a heavy hand in bumping it from the 8 range down into the 7s.Gigglepoo said:Hey, GS reviewer here. Two quick things while I walk home. 1 - I love Zelda games (which is why I reviewed this) and did enjoy SS despite its flaws. 2 - Sorry for any spoilers. I tried not to give anything major away but I do have to point out specific things if I'm going to properly critique.
Thanks for not making fun of my weight!
Here we goGigglepoo said:Hey, GS reviewer here. Two quick things while I walk home. 1 - I love Zelda games (which is why I reviewed this) and did enjoy SS despite its flaws. 2 - Sorry for any spoilers. I tried not to give anything major away but I do have to point out specific things if I'm going to properly critique.
Thanks for not making fun of my weight!
Gigglepoo said:Hey, GS reviewer here. Two quick things while I walk home. 1 - I love Zelda games (which is why I reviewed this) and did enjoy SS despite its flaws. 2 - Sorry for any spoilers. I tried not to give anything major away but I do have to point out specific things if I'm going to properly critique.
Thanks for not making fun of my weight!
EmCeeGramr said:WHO ARE "THEY", MASON!?
I Push Fat Kids said:Are you a kid?
I don't have any issue with people disagreeing with a review, but I think it's funny how many instantly jump on it for "trolling" or "begging for hits."Lord_Byron28 said:While there are definetly some obnoxious posts in there. I don't see anything wrong in some of them disagreeing with the reviewer.
BTW, does this game use IR or not? I remember everyone trying out the demo said it didn't use IR and (I didn't read the review due to spoiler warnings but a lot of people say) he complained the IR didn't work right.
According to Metacritic, Wards of the Alpha-Cipher, a B+ is 83%.Jonnyram said:Is 7.5 lower than B+? I'm not sure. Can we get a 1UP expert in here to give us an analysis?