Support NeoGAF

[PauloRoberto]

It was widely reported that Concord costs hundreds of millions. Sony have no incentive to confirm that.

The RROD was a hardware issue early in the life cycle of a successful console. It is in no way comparable to Concord's unprecedented failure as a video game / entertainment product.

Well, it's widely reported that RROD cost US$ 1 bi for MS, so.. yeah, we can compare it. But since you clearly as a bias, ignore.

 

[m14]

Well, it's widely reported that RROD cost US$ 1 bi for MS, so.. yeah, we can compare it. But since you clearly as a bias, ignore.

And the people attempting to downplay Concord's failure somehow aren't biased in your view?

No, we can't compare. One is a hardware issue, the other is a failed video game. Classic shifting of the goalposts.

 

[John Wick]

It was widely reported that Concord costs hundreds of millions. Sony have no incentive to confirm that.

The RROD was a hardware issue early in the life cycle of a successful console. It is in no way comparable to Concord's unprecedented failure as a video game / entertainment product.

Again your talking nonsense. Widely reported by who? Who outside of Sony would know the costs involved???
RROD was much worse than Concord. It set MS back billions never mind millions. Clearly your biased is obvious.

 

[pasterpl]

Will someone show him MS chart from the “Beginnings of time”? Or mods are we allowed to make shit threads like this now?