I need one mayo member
sw-3496-7639-2877
What are you trying to imply?
Learn to eat Mayo.
If you loose more than you win in a random matchmaking without bias, you're below average of people playing...Nah, man. I'm consistently cracking 1000+, and 1200+ on an infrequent level, and I've still on a losing side a lot, way more than I have won. Like, no shit, this may be the best I have done point and paint wise in a damn long time. You can only do so much.
Yup, I'll just keep an eye out for open Mayo rooms🙂
Nah, man. I'm consistently cracking 1000+, and 1200+ on an infrequent level, and I've still on a losing side a lot, way more than I have won. Like, no shit, this may be the best I have done point and paint wise in a damn long time. You can only do so much.
We did pretty good overall, just ,my buddy had to bounce. I hate how ya need a full team for this stuff.
Yep. Too many people using Aerosprays like primary damage weapons trying to chase and get into 1v1s and 1v2s. Instead they should disengage and find a different portion of the map that needs rapid inking. It was a problem in the first game too. It's the Splatoon version of "people not playing the objective", at least in Turf War.
E:
This old chestnut. Bullshit that spawn camping - especially spawn camping that's enabled by network lag or outright manipulation - is "skillful" or sportsmanlike conduct. There's nothing sportsman like about people exploiting bullshit mechanics to prevent the opposing team from being able to even compete.
But thanks for reminding me why I had you on ignore.
E2: LOL "skill gap". Such skill sitting there in a defended position where they can just sit in the ink and keep their special abilities topped off so they can spam them with impunity. Such skill.
Spawn camping is the very definition of unsportsmanlike like.
It's also nothing more than griefing.
Yeah we did. 🙂
For some reason I'm remembering the Splatfest before the game release that you could have a team of two....
I hope you two have never won by having over 75% of the ink turfed in your colour. By this logic the moment you got that far, you should have jumped back to your spawn point to give the other team a chance.
You are thinking of rank mode. Splatfest was locked to solo only, which everyone complained about. Which they did "fix" , but now people want it to where it doesnt need to be a full team of four. No clue why they cant just fill in a random spot like they do with salmon runs.
If you loose more than you win in a random matchmaking without bias, you're below average of people playing...
Splatfest matchmaking DO have a bias, though, and there's probably a bias involving weapons and rank.
Not sure the score is really the best measurement of how you're doing (I'm average and I do 1200+ most of the time with aerospray, for example) but I don't have a doubt that in your case you're not responsible of losses...
If they were totally random games and you were of average skill, you would win 50% of the time. It's baffling to me to suggest otherwise, that somehow you're so much better than all your teammates every time and you lose way more than half the time.
Makes no logical sense to suggest that somehow all the bad teammates are assigned to you and you alone.
Salmon run is 4 co-opYou are thinking of rank mode. Splatfest was locked to solo only, which everyone complained about. Which they did "fix" , but now people want it to where it doesnt need to be a full team of four. No clue why they cant just fill in a random spot like they do with salmon runs.
Ah, that makes sense.
I can't imagine how many people it's easy to get a four man team up and running easily. I'm curious as to the thought process behind it.
I push the enemy base on every game, but I fucking leave when I'm done painting because not doing do is bullshit behavior.
It doesn't change at all on average...This is literal nonsense guys. You're using the logic as if this is 1v1. It's 4v4. It's not that hard to fathom at all lol.
It doesn't change at all on average...
Opponents have as much chances of being shitty in the opposing team.
I could write a firmal proof if you want![]()
The real answer to this splatfest:
![]()
Make sure to actually use Ink Armor unlike the past three I've seen that used it a total of zero times in our gameYay I unlocked the Bullshit Bucket aka the Trislosher. Gonna try that one out tonight.
I'm glad that Japan had the correct winner.
The real answer to this splatfest:
![]()
What is this? a lifehack?
Sriracha ketchup is better.
This is literal nonsense guys. You're using the logic as if this is 1v1. It's 4v4. It's not that hard to fathom at all lol.
Well, the conclusion is that matchmaking isn't random... I never said it was, just that IF it was, an above average player will win more than 50%I mean, you can write whatever you want, but I'm the one actually playing my games, not you. It's obviously not every time, and I have gotten on some good teams, but when you're consistently the highest scorer of the game, you see teammates doing stupid shit or not painting significant portions of the maps, and you're consistently on teams that have very low level players against those that lack them, I think I can come to my own conclusions.
Do you understand anything about probability?
If you are rolling 4 dice and your enemy is rolling 4 dice and you're each adding up your scores, you are not going to lose way more than 50% of the time.
Why in the world are you picturing some grand conspiracy where Nintendo is consistently matching you up with bad players? Just to torment you? You've never seen a person drop from the other team, a person idling on the other team, a person going around meticulously painting the walls on the other team? It only happens tou you?
Player level doesn't mean all that much besides how much time you've played the game.
Make sure to actually use Ink Armor unlike the past three I've seen that used it a total of zero times in our game