Muffdraul
Member
How is she unattractive?
Sharp knees, bad hairdo, would bang. Not, I mean. Would not bang.
How is she unattractive?
Just a hunch but I think they tried to make her look like the good pictures and not like the bad ones.
Of course it does.. everyone saying this ugliness isnt on purpose is just flat out lying and/or being purposely disingenuousDoesn't it take extra work to make her nose crooked though? Nobody ever made a crooked game nose because they screwed up making a straight one.
How is she unattractive?
Just a hunch but I think they tried to make her look like the good pictures and not like the bad ones.
That is what I'm trying to explain. We don't have enough info to make these sure conclusions. Also not everyone has the same idea of beauty or attractive.
Thanks for being reasonable. This site is an echochamber, despite having some good discussions on here.
And this character is not even meant look "sexy" or "hot".
Even when Japanese devs go for more realistic visuals style they never go out their make the characters look ugly.
There are so many benefits to using an actors head scan for a character. Actors get scanned all the time for the facial mocap process. It helps tremendously in getting a more accurate mocap performance. At this point its industry standard. In modeling it helps with getting details that otherwise the artist would have to recreate. That saves time and money on these tight deadlines. For realistic characters almost everybody does a scan for the base model then characterizes the model for whatever art direction they going for. I agree with the director, a lot of you all don't know enough of the process to have a good faith argument about it other than to say she's ugly and its an agenda.I will say, that is something I've always thought was weird. Knowing actors/actresses/models got scanned into a game, but then having their likeness altered or changed. What's the point of even scanning them at all then? The budget and everything else that comes into play just feels like a total waste IMO, and it's generally not cheap at all. If you're going through the trouble of implementing actual people, shouldn't they look like them? Isn't that the whole point?
Doesn't it take extra work to make her nose crooked though? Nobody ever made a crooked game nose because they screwed up making a straight one.
Doesn't it take extra work to make her nose crooked though? Nobody ever made a crooked game nose because they screwed up making a straight one.
And this character is not even meant look "sexy" or "hot".
Even when Japanese devs go for more realistic visuals style they never go out their make the characters look ugly.
I'm not sure why you're quoting me as I was in agreement with the Director. Don't really think it's fair to be lumped into the folks saying "she's ugly or it's an agenda" as I've never said anything of the sort. I'm well aware of the benefits, it's why it's standard these days. Depending on the actor/actress/model, it can be more expensive, it all depends. But on the same note, it does make things easier in terms of animation, modeling, texture, etc. All I was implying in what you quoted is that I think it's a bit strange to make pretty obvious adjustments to an already scanned model/face. Just that from an outside perspective, it feels like an odd choice.There are so many benefits to using an actors head scan for a character. Actors get scanned all the time for the facial mocap process. It helps tremendously in getting a more accurate mocap performance. At this point its industry standard. In modeling it helps with getting details that otherwise the artist would have to recreate. That saves time and money on these tight deadlines. For realistic characters almost everybody does a scan for the base model then characterizes the model for whatever art direction they going for. I agree with the director, a lot of you all don't know enough of the process to have a good faith argument about it other than to say she's ugly and its an agenda.
How is she unattractive?
I’d assume they made her nose crooked to imply she’s been in a lot of brawls.Doesn't it take extra work to make her nose crooked though? Nobody ever made a crooked game nose because they screwed up making a straight one.
For my taste Star Wars is really looks off putting, in my opinion she looks like badly made model more than being ugly, it looks her hair is fake and wearing wig.Idk if that character is supposed to be hot or not. But for what it's worth id choose star wars girl.
It’s a seemingly endless agenda. One reason I think they do it is because they are trying to change beauty standards because they hate how they look and are very insecure around anything remotely more attractive or feminine than they are. They want everything to center around their little universe. Honestly, I think the Star Wars Outlaw character looks kind of attractive in some screenshots, but my question for most non-Asian games is why get a gorgeous model just to uglify her or tone her down? Why not just get a homely or average looking model to replicate instead?why do they make ugly characters on purpose? i just dont understand it
Totally.It’s a seemingly endless agenda. One reason I think they do it is because they are trying to change beauty standards because they hate how they look and are very insecure around anything remotely more attractive or feminine than they are. They want everything to center around their little universe. Honestly, I think the Star Wars Outlaw character looks kind of attractive in some screenshots, but my question for most non-Asian games is why get a gorgeous model just to uglify her or tone her down? Why not just get a homely or average looking model to replicate instead?
I would also highly recommend everyone take ALL reviews once this launches with a grain of salt.....this is what IGN considers groundbreaking and awesome.....Mel Gibson slapping a stormtrooper in the head.
I see what you are saying. Sorry didn't mean to lump you in with other comments. 1:1 scans/digi double are a whole other contract deal and in another price range. Depends on the target. Are we auditioning for likeness and voice for this role? Or maybe Just a likeness scan and we will hire an actor for the voice? The actors look may not fit with the other characters in the game world, so then the artist does tweaks so that the look sits in line with other characters and is believable in that world. IMO the actress looks to clean for what they described her character as being in that world. So the artist made her look like she's in some fights and can take a punch. Everything you described is part of the story telling of that character and sometimes you cant get that with just a head scan.I'm not sure why you're quoting me as I was in agreement with the Director. Don't really think it's fair to be lumped into the folks saying "she's ugly or it's an agenda" as I've never said anything of the sort. I'm well aware of the benefits, it's why it's standard these days. Depending on the actor/actress/model, it can be more expensive, it all depends. But on the same note, it does make things easier in terms of animation, modeling, texture, etc. All I was implying in what you quoted is that I think it's a bit strange to make pretty obvious adjustments to an already scanned model/face. Just that from an outside perspective, it feels like an odd choice.
Edit: Allow me to iterate. When I originally said that I was referring to the addition of the cleft chin, and the adjustment of facial features that make it look like her, but not so much. Maybe it could just be the quality of Ubi's tech or lack there of? Who knows. Could also just be the teams choice, much like the broken nose. I just don't think we've seen it before, unless I'm mistaken. Other titles have just had more 1:1 scan of actors/actresses/models. Or closest to it. This, not so much. Again, this is not an "agenda" just an observation.
For my taste Star Wars is really looks off putting, in my opinion she looks like badly made model more than being ugly, it looks her hair is fake and wearing wig.
The picture poster she suppose to be bookworm type of character and really not meant look "sexy" but she doesn't look actively ugly.....but this is solely based on my subjective opinion.
This one other hand absolutely meant look sexy.
I don't know if the images I posted are recent. I just found them on Google.Looks like they fixed her fucked up model. Her chin is totally different now!
Like I said in my original post, I’m not even asking them to make them look “sexy” but just don’t make them look ugly. I don’t care about race or sex, in both video games and movies people want to see good looking people in entertainment.I don't think star wars girl is supposed to be that sexy. Seems like a sort of badlands roughneck character.
Like I said in my original post, I’m not even asking them to make them look “sexy” but just don’t make them look ugly. I don’t care about race or sex, in both video games and movies people want to see good looking people in entertainment.
Again mostly subjective opinion but I REALLY find Star Wars girl’s look off putting.
Better than that bookworm girl.
I'm not sure its general human nature, since the vast majority of people seem completely fine playing video games without being physically attracted to a protagonist.Yes, we must suppress human nature comrade.
Lol I just had to comment on your Username Blurb and I thought mine was bad, those Admins are a cruel but funny bunch...Yeah but the thing is, those jpeg cost money and I'm not paying for ugly shit.
damn imagine what could have been...also imaging being the actress and seeing what ubisoft did to youI don't know if the images I posted are recent. I just found them on Google.
This site is only an "echo chamber" if you consider common sense takes - reenforced by the vast majority of public opinion you could canvas - more accurately described that way, than majority opinion.That is what I'm trying to explain. We don't have enough info to make these sure conclusions. Also not everyone has the same idea of beauty or attractive.
Thanks for being reasonable. This site is an echochamber, despite having some good discussions on here.
Ahh the little SJW wallposter bullshiter @...int me, my day is complete.True, but it can also be some screw up.
Either way, I'm not sure it really matters. Lets say it was on purpose, their intent might be to make some rough and tough person that has been in fights, battles and isn't a model or something. They are an outlaw, smuggler etc so maybe its intentional
I'd still side with the director (or really any game director tbh). It is their game and they don't need to change anything, for all we know its explained in the game that its from some bar fight where she cheated in Poker or something lol Who knows.
Bernardougf Well.....not really.
The issue here is, what someone thinks is ugly or pretty is simply too subjective to think that someone disagreeing with you be disingenuous. There cannot be a true or false here. If you feel she is ugly, that is your view, I cannot tell you that such a thing is "true" or "false" as...fuck am I suppose to do? Enter your mind?
Thus, someone who disagrees and thinks she is fine, pretty etc, that is their view of that person. Such a thing cannot really be a true or false to then be "disingenuous" sir, that makes zero sense and I feel its like you guys are so triggered folks disagree with you, that you believe it just must not be real vs SHOCK someone has an opinion that is different then yours.
So...I never doubt your views, if you feel she is ugly, I believe you feel that way for real.
Least you can do is provide that same respect back as its almost as if you guys are confused that we have free will or something lol
Not everyone agrees with each other, that isn't some wild revelation.
It’s not that, it would be nice to have the option to play as a male character too imo.He's not wrong. Some people are way too concerned about the attractiveness of characters.
Well you probably basically will be ... at least in their fucked up eyes... is their idea of a "female" protagonist... but in fact they try to gender neutralize her by giving male features, strength and behavior. Most female protagonists this days in any media btw, could be swapped by a male one, with very little hiccups, if any, to the continuity of the story or events.It’s not that, it would be nice to have the option to play as a male character too imo.
Ahh the little SJW wallposter bullshiter @...int me, my day is complete.
Nah, you can't agree with him at all it seems, if you do you are SJW apparently. No opinions are allowed basically.I agree with him a bit but Shit yall better not see my mass effect character, fallout etc i always make dem real ugly the way the hero suppose to be hahaha
This is not mario bro ... I agree that gameplay is king, but this argument really dosent hold up in heavily story driven games when you will be doing multiple interactions and seeing cutscenes all the time. If it dosent botter you fair enouth, but you cant use the argument that you will barely see the characters faces and expressions in this type of games.How gives a shit what the main characters look like, more so when most of the time you'll be seeing the backs of them. I just care if the game is fun and good to play and from the gameplay previews it looks a great game
I can see why people would like that as option. But games with a defined protagonist are very common, it's not like this is something specific to Outlaws.It’s not that, it would be nice to have the option to play as a male character too imo.
I mean, holy shit you going to tell the person what they like and how to play games too huh?This is not mario bro ... I agree that gameplay is king, but this argument really dosent hold up in heavily story driven games when you will be doing multiple interactions and seeing cutscenes all the time. If it dosent botter you fair enouth, but you cant use the argument that you will barely see the characters faces and expressions in this type of games.
Oh get fucked. It's not our fault you made her look like a toad.
It makes sense for me too. I was just saying that I don't see it being a too unreasonable request (some of the Assassin's Creed games give people a choice of gender for example.I mean, holy shit you going to tell the person what they like and how to play games too huh?
Someone playing a game for fun, is now some wild "argument"?
Christ man, you can't make this shit up.
Woopah I'm ok with that if its like a open ended type story or something, but because this game is about "outlaws" and its character driven, it makes sense for playing 1 character.
I feel AC Valhalla did a great job with that. Because you are in some DNA, time machine type shit, it can work lolIt makes sense for me too. I was just saying that I don't see it being a too unreasonable request (some of the Assassin's Creed games give people a choice of gender for example.
Please, this is Star Wars hardly a franchise known for its narrative, beautiful women and great scriptsThis is not mario bro ... I agree that gameplay is king, but this argument really dosent hold up in heavily story driven games when you will be doing multiple interactions and seeing cutscenes all the time. If it dosent botter you fair enouth, but you cant use the argument that you will barely see the characters faces and expressions in this type of games.
Looks like they fixed her fucked up model. Her chin is totally different now!
I hate WOKE and what it's doing to the USA and UK but that won't stop me from enjoying a well made game.Team Andromeda nooooo, you can't like the game at all or you are SJW bro, didn't you hear the clowns at the circus? Agree with them or SJW bro /s
Bad faith games aren't worth engaging in either.