brucewaynegretzky said:
Ok I know people have been posting these left and right, but would I be able to load this on my Dell Studio with these specs and what setting could I play on:
Graphics Card: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Processor: 2.4 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo
RAM: 4.0 GB
Vista SP 2
I'm not the most tech savvy person in the world so this is very helpful. I recently put C&C:RA3 on it and I was disappointed to find that the computer I bought I think a year after it came out could only play on the lowest settings. I'd get over it for SC2.
O and what is the unit cap in 2? Did they up it past 200?
no the unit cap is around 200, they probably figure it wont be long before you are down to less than 200 lings anyway since thats the only way you'd see it.
OK and let me make this perfectly clear to those of you who have similar questions about whether SC2 will run in the future:
SC2 RUNS AT 20FPS on all low at 1024X768 on my 1000HE netbook, which by the way has a
1.9GHZ SINGLE CORE ATOM and
INTEL GMA 950 GRAPHICS.
If that's not mindblowing enough, the atom at 1.6GHZ is equivalent to a pentium 1GHZ. Yeah. Single core 1GHZ pentium with terrible integrated graphics can actually have a, you could say, worthwhile playing experience. You wouldn't have to go much higher to AT LEAST run at 30fps on all low during big battles (the atom would chug for sure).
I know this may not tell you exactly how well you'd play the game with those cards, honestly I and most others couldnt say for sure about high or more but medium should be OK, the game is still very beautiful on low anyways so it doesnt matter IMHO.
