GHG
Gold Member
So Nvidia users get screwed on more way than one.
Thank god for that DLSS mod.
have you tried with the DLSS2 mod yet or is that without?I have 5600 and a 3070, I’m getting between 40 and 80 depending on where I am
Behold the mighty Creation EngineLOL, zero optimization for Nvidia.
The best thing that this is 1080p, this game doesn't have any RT, Lumen (or any form of GI), Nanite etc. NOTHING that justifies this performance, even SSR is absent just ancient cube map reflections.
What the fuck Bethesda?
Working as intended.rtx 2080 cant get to 30 fps , something is very wrong
It does support DLSS 3,just not frame generationThat's actually really nice of him, he could have paywalled the entire mod but he's letting us have DLSS2 for free
Since my 3090 doesn't support DLSS3 anyways, this is a win-win for me
Nothing is wrong, it's a creative decision.rtx 2080 cant get to 30 fps , something is very wrong
Maybe nvidia can release some optimized drivers for the game.
AMD released yesterday a set of drivers that increased performance by 16%.
If nvidia does the same, it will almost bring parity.
Behold the mighty Creation Engine
LMAO
You have a 7800X3D and a 4080, you better damn well not have severe drops so don't be surprised.It may not be well optimised compared to other AAA games but this is seriously the first time I've played a Bethesda game without crazy frame drops in the cities and I've been playing since Morrowind. Maybe they have improved the engine a bit or maybe my 7800x3d just brute forces things but I'm very happy with the performance. On my old 3900x and 2070s I could get Skyrim and Fallout 4 to drop below 60fps and more like 30fps in places for Fallout but this is stable so far. To be fair my min fps went up by 3 to 4 times with the 7800x3d in Fallout so maybe not Bethesda doing any improvements but the 3D cache just overpowering the jank.
1440p native so no FSR junk otherwise all max settings on a 7800x3d & 4080 gives 65-100 fps in cities and 120-140 fps indoors. There are load points all over but they are 1-4 seconds so far on a gen 4 NVME.
Some stuff looks shit even on max settings (foliage and the non talky NPCS) but surprising beautiful for a Bethesda game too. I'm sure this old engine is bursting at the seams but if it's what it takes to get Mass Effect meets Oblivion I'll take it.
Game looks not that much better than F4 but runs like some new UE5 title. What the fuck they are calculating here on GPU? I have the same question for FFXVI, both games look last gen but are performance hogs.
This gen is becoming a huge disappointment. Games are pushing the hardware hard, but without the respective jump in quality.
Even games using UE5 are seeing this problem. Immortals of Aveum and Remnant 2 push the hardware hard, but don't look nearly has good to justify the performance.
Also, upscaling, which was up until recently just a nice extra to have, is not being used by devs to improve performance, instead of doing proper optimization of their games.
Exactly, every new game is released without any optimization pass.
Exactly, every new game is released without any optimization pass.
Looks like SDR and HDR is broken in this game, amazing...
This studio is just a bunch of incompetent fucks, even with MS money.
Honestly, SDR looks like a cinema RAW footage before the LUTs and development, looks so strange. (downscaled)What a shit show. I think HDR didn't exist when they started working on this game.
This is interesting. I’m finding that early on, I’m GPU limited. My CPU is sitting around 40% utilisation.5800X3D
3080 FE
32GB DDR4 3600
GEN.4 ssd
4K LG CX with FSR2
In short, a decent setup.
Boy the IQ with FSR2 is rough and FPS is unstable. CPU is clearly a bottleneck. Game crashed 4 times on alt-tab, cursor bug from Skyrim is back. Colors are cleary broken both in SDR and (faux)HDR. Was DF even looking at this game? To date, their most useless video.
But hey, raw input, finally.
Not yet. Only had an hour before work. im playing on ultra preset 1440p and with fsr2. Haven’t changed any settings.have you tried with the DLSS2 mod yet or is that without?
Is it easy to install for a total mod noob?Man, I would recommend just downloadimg the DLSS 2 mod and enjoy the game.
Not worth it. It's an injector with very blurry output. With all it's faults FSR2 is still better and the performance is roughly the same for me.Is it easy to install for a total mod noob?
Yeah, same with DLSS.The visuals go from looking great to outdated very quickly. The framerate seems to be all over the place too on a 2080TI. Yes it's an older card, but it's still fairly powerful for rasterization. I'm running the DLSS mod which doesn't really help framerate much, FSR and DLSS are about the same for me. Kinda disappointed but hey hopefully patches will improve performance in future or performance mods.
We will see but I doubt any major differences will happen.
Game looks not that much better than F4 but runs like some new UE5 title. What the fuck they are calculating here on GPU? I have the same question for FFXVI, both games look last gen but are performance hogs.
They released the drivers one week ago and they already make a 10-13 frames difference.Maybe nvidia can release some optimized drivers for the game.
AMD released yesterday a set of drivers that increased performance by 16%.
If nvidia does the same, it will almost bring parity.
anyone else get the feeling premium was a paid beta test?
But...but...it's the upgraded version, basically a new engineBehold the mighty Creation Engine
LMAO
No he got the standard code from amd. He bought the premium edition which we cannot gameshare because Microsoft disabled it on steam.I have a bit of an unrelated question, did your friend get premium edition for his 7800X3D? I havent bothered redeeming mine cause I thought it was standard
Re HDR: there's no setting for it in the game at all, apparently it just takes the windows one lol.
As for the DLSS mod setting, not sure yet. I downloaded it but dont have the game unlocked.
Agreed, I think it looks impressive.Fallout 4???
From someone who has played the game, it looks MILES better than fallout 4!
I've tested them both and both are blurry injections without a proper ML data. Stick with FSR2.Starfield FSR2 Bridge - Replacing FSR2 with DLSS or XeSS
Allows you to use DLSS or XeSS in place of the built-in FSR2 without ReShade.No Frame Generation support!www.nexusmods.com
from what I heard this works better than Puredark and has no reshade dependency. Can someone test them both and see if thats true?
Yeah, I'm at 1440p with a little DLSS to help (thanks DLSS mod). Framerates can be a little erratic in spots in this game but it's mostly smooth.4090/13700K/32GO DDR5@6200MHz/Firecuda 530 Gen4 @4K and I'm in the 50s/low 60s more often than anything else.
I need to be in 1440p (native for my display) to get 70+FPS in New Atlantis (full ultra of course, no shitty FSR).
I've tested them both and both are blurry injections without a proper ML data
“[Camera]
fFPWorldFOV=xx.0000
fTPWorldFOV=xx.0000
The mod is working?Man, I would recommend just downloadimg the DLSS 2 mod and enjoy the game.
But can they fix them?Yeah, they have additional few days to deal with most glaring issues that would otherwise cause the flood of negative reviews on steam.
It is but comments on here are saying it looks worse than FSRThe mod is working?