faridmon said:Wow, K-on fans talking about cinematogrophy and some Danielplainview-like talk here...
now, i have seen everything.
Are you sure? K-On! also has the cutest cast ever in an anime. No one character in the K-On! world is presented as ugly. They pretty much live in a perfect world of cuteness and happiness. It's also a really safe show with no boys allowed.faridmon said:Wow, K-on fans talking about cinematogrophy and some Danielplainview-like talk here...
now, i have seen everything.
jman2050 said:Dang graphics whores...
Vox-Pop said:Are you sure? K-On! also has the cutest cast ever in an anime. No one character in the K-On! world is presented as ugly. They pretty much live in a perfect world of cuteness and happiness.
DY_nasty said:So wait.... K-On is actually good? I really thought this was all a part of some elaborate group troll. :lol
7Th said:K-ON!(!) is genuinely good in the sense that the staff is rather talented and it really shows in the elaborate scene composition and the very fun and surprisingly loose naturalistic animation. You sure could say it is essentially "content-less", but I don't think that make it any less enjoyable or well-made.
Branduil said:It's well-animated, but it's not good. It's the moe equivalent of soft-core pornography.
Vox-Pop said:Are you sure? K-On! also has the cutest cast ever in an anime. No one character in the K-On! world is presented as ugly. They pretty much live in a perfect world of cuteness and happiness. It's also a really safe show with no boys allowed.
Jintor said:(Though i certainly wouldn't go so far as to call it 'the greatest anime of all time')
i beg to differ:Vox-Pop said:Are you sure? K-On! also has the cutest cast ever in an anime. No one character in the K-On! world is presented as ugly. They pretty much live in a perfect world of cuteness and happiness. It's also a really safe show with no boys allowed.
Yes, it's well-produced. It still lacks content, with no humor, plot, or believable character development. It's completely vapid. Now, it's not actively offensive like Lucky Star, which in addition to being vapid pandered grossly to its audience. But it's still not good.7Th said:The animation isn't the only thing good about K-ON!(!); the cinematography is excellent, the naturalistic lighting is way above the typical overly shiny KyoAni fluff, and the direction and scene composition are fun and very detailed. I personally think something as thoughtfully executed deserves to called "good", but that's just me.
anything that takes the mick out of Gundam and thier fans is a plus in my book.Branduil said:Yes, it's well-produced. It still lacks content, with no humor, plot, or believable character development. It's completely vapid. Now, it's not actively offensive like Lucky Star, which in addition to being vapid pandered grossly to its audience. But it's still not good.
Every time I look at Azumanga I think to myself that a Yostube manga would be amazing. BELIEVE.jman2050 said:Wrong again!
![]()
faridmon said:i beg to differ:
![]()
The thing that makes Azumanga good as opposed to things like K-on and Lucky Star is that it focuses on comedy, the cuteness is just a secondary feature. That, and while the characters are obviously stereotypes, they're stereotypes that at least behave somewhat believably. Okay, maybe not Kimura, but he's still hilarious. The characters in K-on and Lucky Star feel like they were crafted by a computer program designed to elicit maximum moe and money from otaku.jman2050 said:Wrong again!
![]()
Unknown Soldier said:Spoken like someone who's obviously never seen the show and who has no idea what he's talking about.
Proelite said:So, the biggest question of the week, is:
did they do it or not?
HSOTD
Unknown Soldier said:That depends on whether you believe the anime is canonical, or the manga.They clearly did not do it in the manga.
Branduil said:The thing that makes Azumanga good as opposed to things like K-on and Lucky Star is that it focuses on comedy, the cuteness is just a secondary feature. That, and while the characters are obviously stereotypes, they're stereotypes that at least behave somewhat believably. Okay, maybe not Kimura, but he's still hilarious. The characters in K-on and Lucky Star feel like they were crafted by a computer program designed to elicit maximum moe and money from otaku.
Branduil said:Yes, it's well-produced. It still lacks content, with no humor, plot, or believable character development. It's completely vapid. Now, it's not actively offensive like Lucky Star, which in addition to being vapid pandered grossly to its audience. But it's still not good.
Proelite said:Implying that they clearly did it in the anime?
Branduil said:I've watched several episodes.
Unknown Soldier said:I watched the NBA Finals once, and I know that Kobe has 5 rings and Dirk has 0. Therefore, I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that Kobe is a better basketball player than Dirk.
Vox-Pop said:There really isn't that much of a story difference from Azumanga to K-On!
Vox-Pop said:So any ideas on the title for the fall 2010 anime thread?
jman2050 said:...but Kobe is better than Dirk. By quite a lot too.
Do you intentionally come up with the worst analogies possible to support your position just to troll us?
??????Unknown Soldier said:I watched the NBA Finals once, and I know that Kobe has 5 rings and Dirk has 0. Therefore, I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that Kobe is a better basketball player than Dirk.
Do you see the fallacy here?
I don't get it?Which just further highlights how Azumanga executed the concept so much better
Apparently watching all of K-on forces people to make mind-numbingly inapplicable analogies. Seriously, that analogy is so far removed from a workable one that I cannot fathom what is being compared or how the pieces are supposed to connect.Unknown Soldier said:I watched the NBA Finals once, and I know that Kobe has 5 rings and Dirk has 0. Therefore, I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that Kobe is a better basketball player than Dirk.
Do you see the fallacy here?
jman2050 said:This is because, shockingly enough, Azuma can actually write. It's unbelievable, I know, but there you go.
7Th said:I'm currently watching, and enjoying, this show. This is way too big of a coincidence.
flawfuls said:I just finished watching The Rose of Versailles and reading Claudine recently so more Riyoko Ikeda is welcome.
But it does have a plot. It concerns the band, high school and college/future. It's a coming of age story. They have to deal with the hardships of tests, band practice, and if they should continue the band or go to school. The girls are just trying to find their place in the world.Branduil said:Apparently watching all of K-on forces people to make mind-numbingly inapplicable analogies. Seriously, that analogy is so far removed from a workable one that I cannot fathom what is being compared or how the pieces are supposed to connect.
I believe I watched a sufficient percentage to understand the show. It's not like K-on has character arcs or a plot, so the show does not vary dramatically from one episode to the next.
And in Yotsubato he's actually gotten better. If a Yotsubato anime ever gets made, it will be so amazing that it will actually go back in time and cause a number of the worst anime to never exist.
Branduil said:And in Yotsubato he's actually gotten better. If a Yotsubato anime ever gets made, it will be so amazing that it will actually go back in time and cause a number of the worst anime to never exist.
That's not really a plot, and I doubt the idea is explored in great detail.Vox-Pop said:But it does have a plot. It concerns the band, high school and college/future. It's a coming of age story. They have to deal with the hardships of tests, band practice, and if they should continue the band or go to school. The girls are just trying to find their place in the world.
Branduil said:That's not really a plot, and I doubt the idea is explored in great detail.
I wouldn't say Azumanga has a plot either.
Unknown Soldier said:It's strongly implied in the anime, whereas it's completely not implied even the slightest bit in the manga. I personally hope that the Sato brothers take the anime as a big hint that the canonical pairing SHOULD BE Takashi + Saeko even though no pairing of any sort has occurred in the manga yet.
I've seen all of twice.Unknown Soldier said:Okay, this is not a trick question: Have you actually watched more than a few episodes of Azumanga?
What's your definition of a plot? A group of girls going to school-although it would be considered unoriginal-is still a plot.Branduil said:That's not really a plot, and I doubt the idea is explored in great detail.
I wouldn't say Azumanga has a plot either.
That's not plot, it's setting.Vox-Pop said:What's your definition of a plot? A group of girls going to school-although it would be considered unoriginal-is still a plot.
AfroLuffy said:Awesome. I'll likely start Rose of Versailles soon myself, since I can't find any other old Dezaki works to watch. Ikeda and Dezaki seem like a good combination, if Oniisama e is anything to go on.
I don't think that correct, but whatever.Branduil said:That's not plot, it's setting.
I don't see why this is controversial, the entire idea of slice-of-life is philosophically opposed to traditional plot structure.
All plots contain events, but events are not plot.
Branduil said:I've seen all of twice.
Unknown Soldier said:I thought 7th posted awhile back that he had already finished the Fall thread OP and was waiting for the mods to let him create it.
Unknown Soldier said:All right, just checking. Carry on, then. Although if you bothered to watch more than a few episodes of K-ON you would find that structurally they are very similar, they follow a group of girls as they go through their 3 years of Japanese high school. The difference is that Azumanga is considerably more zany and comedy-focused, but K-ON has way, way better music.
I think he just asked for permission.duckroll said:This has to be a lie though, how can he have finished the thread when some shows don't even have confirmed air dates yet.![]()
If my mind was closed I wouldn't have watched any of it. Notice I never said K-on was terrible.Unknown Soldier said:All right, just checking. Carry on, then. Although if you bothered to watch more than a few episodes of K-ON you would find that structurally they are very similar, they follow a group of girls as they go through their 3 years of Japanese high school. The difference is that Azumanga is considerably more zany and comedy-focused, but K-ON has way, way better music. You might even find that with their similarities you could actually enjoy K-ON if you just opened your mind a little bit, because right now it's closed more tightly than a bank vault.
Jerk 2.0 said:And less creepy art.
duckroll said:This has to be a lie though, how can he have finished the thread when some shows don't even have confirmed air dates yet.![]()
7Th said:I have the summaries and pictures ready, I mean. Besides, the shows that matter already have their air dates confirmed.
duckroll said:Really... So does Star Driver start on the 3rd of October, or the 10th of October?![]()
7Th said:October 10th, right after SenBa 2 ends... right?
duckroll said:So SenBa2 is 13 episodes? Source?
duckroll said:Really... So does Star Driver start on the 3rd of October, or the 10th of October?![]()
This story takes place on an island named Southern Cross Isle. One night, a boy named Takuto washed up on shore, after having swum from the mainland. He later, enrolls in Southern Cross High School as a senior and makes new friends. However, underneath the school, are these mysterious giants called Cybuddies. There are about 20 of these giants, and they are just some of the various secrets kept by everyone on the island: The secret movements of the mysterious organization known as "Kirahoshi Juujidan", the songs of the shrine maidens. Takuto himself will soon come to embrace a great secret.
7Th said:How about this: when NewType October hits the streets and we know SD's official air date, you'll let me create the fall season thread!
Deadly said:I'm going to miss K-ON when it's gone =(