They could maybe worry about building a competitive car and hiring competitive drivers as well.
To be fair, the car and the drivers aren't really Red Bull's problem right now. Not even remotely.
They could maybe worry about building a competitive car and hiring competitive drivers as well.
To be fair, the car and the drivers aren't really Red Bull's problem right now. Not even remotely.
How would Audi joining make things better for Red Bull?
New blood and a fresh look always makes things better. Just look at Honda with McLaren.
New blood and a fresh look always makes things better. Just look at Honda with McLaren.
Ouch. Would Audi only join as an engine manufacturer? Even all the other engines should be pretty close before Audi could deliver.New blood and a fresh look always makes things better. Just look at Honda with McLaren.
Lets imagine the following thing... (quote)
Lets imagine someone puts a small bladderlike device after the fuel flow sensor. One that fills with fuel when the car brakes, when the fuel flow is low and this bit more isn´t noticeable. Now imagine you could use this small reservoir like a turbo boost, especially in fast turns, like f.i. sector 3 in Barcelona. Now imagine you couldn´t use that anymore, ´cause the stewards know what to look for. It´s not out of imagination, you´d suddenly lose .5sec in said sector.
But that would hint at it being a driver controlled device right? as the cars were already in Parc fermé conditions when the suspicions were raised.
Well, Mercedes is donating 100 for each kilometer that ROS leads for Laureus Sport for Good Foundation... that means they donated almost 28.000 for Barcelona race alone
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/may/11/lewis-hamilton-mercedes-three-year-contract-f1-130m
£130m / 3 years - if true, wow. That's a lot.
A bit disappointed Lewis won't leave Mercedes. Would have loved him at Ferrari. Don't get the sense that Toto likes Lewis at all.
Well, he will be able to buy a bigger private jet for his travels #jetset #swag #yolo #whereisroscoe # $ingle4lif
Either Red Bull get a competitive engine, Audi join, or they leave.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/32688667
Byebitch.jif
Don't get the sense that Toto likes Lewis at all.
I didn't realise Porsche and Audi were owned by the same companies. How does that work when they're competing against each other in WEC?Either Red Bull get a competitive engine, Audi join, or they leave.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/32688667
Byebitch.jif
Sounds like Toto is a bigger cheerleader for Hamilton than people think he is. Didn't they horse around during a press conference while Toto was hungover from partying post Russia GP?Recalibrate your antennas! ;-)
I didn't realise Porsche and Audi were owned by the same companies. How does that work when they're competing against each other in WEC?
I'd love to see Porsche back in it, too.
Edit: Holy shit, each of the Mercs have only used one? Christ, that's depressing.
I didn't realise Porsche and Audi were owned by the same companies. How does that work when they're competing against each other in WEC?
I'd love to see Porsche back in it, too.
Edit: Holy shit, each of the Mercs have only used one? Christ, that's depressing.
Recalibrate your antennas! ;-)
Better yet, in commentary they were suggesting that Merc were going to use the first engine for Monaco too!
That would mean when they bring engine upgrades they can apply them to all remaining engines.
Better yet, in commentary they were suggesting that Merc were going to use the first engine for Monaco too!
That would mean when they bring engine upgrades they can apply them to all remaining engines.
Sounds like Toto is a bigger cheerleader for Hamilton than people think he is. Didn't they horse around during a press conference while Toto was hungover from partying post Russia GP?
I was going to say it wasn't the impression I got from his interviews, though he died seen a bit more evenhanded with the drivers than Lauda.
My view is solely based on his demeanor on TV and in press quotes where he mostly focuses on how awesome Rosberg's 2nd or 3rd was whilst very little said about Lewis' 1st (especially to British TV/media). I reckon he's got to try to prop up his other driver when down
I'd like to think being Hamilton's cheerleader is Lauda's job, Toto does seem like the more impartial middleman.That´s exactly it. He did just the same with HAM this Sunday.
Look, his job is not to be a cheerleader. He needs to make sure both perform to the top of their level. When one does, he´ll commend him for it. But its more important to help the other one get back to that too.
Gotta love how much Red Bull is whoring themselves to Audi.
Meanwhile, there's lots of talk in various meetings about changes for 2017. Here's my initial discussion list.
1) Increase downforce, lowering the car by reducing the step and plank underneath, and improving ground-effect especially with front-wing end fences. Make the front-wing much less complex and susceptible to turbulence while following another car, and therefore hugely cheaper too.
Open up a few of the imaginary exclusion ‘boxes’ around the car to ensure ingenuity and evolution. Have a much cheaper and wider fixed specification two-piece rear-wing which creates drag and slipstream effect, thereby moderating absolute top speed to maintain circuits run offs, but also keeping sponsorship space. Get this right and then lose DRS.
2) Wider and 18” diameter wheels and tyres with much more grip and durability.
3) Lose 50kg from the cars. They are currently 125kg overweight compared to days gone past. Difficult, but try to find a way.
4) Keep the same hybrid engines, they will migrate towards 1000bhp peak anyway, but work on improving the sound and also a much lower fixed-price for customer teams. A discount is massively cheaper for the manufacturers than a redesign. Commonality of parts will slash costs and equalise motors. This should have been done from the outset.
5) Open up the rules on sharing components. It's crazy that everyone must create bespoke items to identical regulations. We can't see these parts so share them, slash costs, equalise the cars more, and knock the money off the grandstand prices. I'm talking about brakes, gearboxes, chassis for customer teams, and so on. We want to watch racing, we don’t have X-ray eyes to see under the bodywork or in the CAD and CFD computers.
From 2017 onwards I never want to hear a driver saying he's holding back to protect his tyres again, or an engineer say on the radio ‘to avoid interaction at the end of the race we’ll...’
Brundle posted his wishlist for 2017
All sensible changes.
They might not say so publicly, but I know that the current drivers are all a bit disillusioned with the current F1 because the cars are so slow compared to previous years, and the drivers are so far within their ability levels during the races.
You watch the in-car camera through somewhere like Turn Three in Barcelona. That should be right on the edge, heart in mouth, nearly flat-out, like it was a few years ago. Now they all have to take a massive lift through there.
You will very rarely hear them saying it publicly but, without exception, no-one in F1 likes the construction and compound range of the current tyres, and people are very negative about Pirelli as a result; hardly good PR.
Now, it is the other way around, and the times the drivers are completely on the limit during a grand prix are a small minority. Sometimes they never are.
A corollary of this is that if the drivers are not pushing, they are far less likely to make a mistake. You don't see so many as you used to. And mistakes add excitement.
Problem is these changes make too much sense for modern F1. Their solutions nowaydays are more like:Well they have no future in the sport otherwise. I don't see Renault improving.
Brundle posted his wishlist for 2017
All sensible changes.
Well earned, if true. He pulled the Joe Flacco power move. Instead of taking the easy extension in your contact year, let it expire and win the championship that year. Your gonna park a bank truck in the off-season. Looks like what Lewis did. PEACE.http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/may/11/lewis-hamilton-mercedes-three-year-contract-f1-130m
£130m / 3 years - if true, wow. That's a lot.
A bit disappointed Lewis won't leave Mercedes. Would have loved him at Ferrari. Don't get the sense that Toto likes Lewis at all.
Meaningless changes if brake technology isn't changed. Carbon brakes bite too damn hard, have zero crossover with consumer cars, and have shrunk braking zones. Lightening the cars and improving grip would only stand to exacerbate the problem IMO.Well they have no future in the sport otherwise. I don't see Renault improving.
Brundle posted his wishlist for 2017
All sensible changes.
Their original plan was 2nd engine at Barcelona. But they decided that they will switch it in Canada, so they will be able to incorporate some token based upgrades into 2nd engine.
Ferrari is already using 2nd engine, so if they want new stuff in it they will have to use 3rd.
No wonder they made insane amount of kilometers during winter with single engine.
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2015/may/11/lewis-hamilton-mercedes-three-year-contract-f1-130m
£130m / 3 years - if true, wow. That's a lot.
A bit disappointed Lewis won't leave Mercedes. Would have loved him at Ferrari. Don't get the sense that Toto likes Lewis at all.
Hamilton doesn't seem to have the hots for Ferrari like so many other F1 drivers.
Yeah, I want to see drivers push again, but there needs to some element of strategy to F1 IMO. Refuelling is never coming back, so I don't know what they could do...