• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

'The Last of Us: Remastered' coming to PS4, July 2014, [1080p, targeting 60 fps]

Solaire of Astora

Death by black JPN
Didnt they say the engine is structured so that it is very difficult for people work with it outside of naughy dog, i thought that was the reason they did this remaster themselve. Cant find the source anymore but iirc that was the reason.

Yes, but the naughty gods have already done all the hard work getting the engine to run so smoothly on ps4. I'm sure BP could work on the uc trilogy. Especially if nd are willing to loan them a few support staff.
 
Wow. The tweets from the ND guys are raising my expectations a bit.


At first it seemed it was going to be 1080p@60fps, with cutscene models, High Res textures, and some less blocky shadows.



From what they are saying, we may indeed get more enhancements...
They've been saying for a while that they've updated the lighting model quite a bit too.
 

benjammin

Member
My question isn't whether or not they are good at hyping their game. I was specifically asking what someone was looking for.

I can understand it when talking a remake or something which has a change of artstyle or has to use new assets in characters and environments, I just don't understand it with a better running port. I just don't understand it. :p

What's not to understand? We're looking for what the new gameplay looks like. They keep hyping it on twitter, but we haven't seen why yet. I know how the game starts, what's going to happen, and how it's going to end. None of that will change for the remaster. Now show me how it looks and how it plays, show me the improvements that have been made. Quit showing me things that I already know about and that could ruin the experience for people who haven't played it yet. I preordered the game sight unseen, they already have my money. Now show me why it's different.
 

Mentok

Banned
I've sung this song at many a Sony/Naughty dog forums and threads. I'd love and would wait for a complete Naughty Dog Collection. A series specific one is great for some and a complete collection would be a hell of a collection to own.

My other wish is for Naughty Dogs multiplayer staff to take over the SOCOM license.

After seeing TLOU multiplayer in action, I think this would be an awesome idea. I miss SOCOM (I don't count any of the PS3 games at all).
 

benny_a

extra source of jiggaflops
What's not to understand? We're looking for what the new gameplay looks like.
That's the point though. It will still be The Last of Us. If you want to see how the gameplay looks, then go on YouTube and watch one of 20 full length playthroughs. That is the gameplay of the game.

If they've already sold you, why should they?
That comes in addition to everything. This is just looking for post-hoc rationalization of pre-ordering something without being sold on the game.
 

quickwhips

Member
I've sung this song at many a Sony/Naughty dog forums and threads. I'd love and would wait for a complete Naughty Dog Collection. A series specific one is great for some and a complete collection would be a hell of a collection to own.

My other wish is for Naughty Dogs multiplayer staff to take over the SOCOM license.
New IP would be better. I want to see them do online coop story mode and more great multiplayer like I've watched in last of us.
 

DevilFox

Member
Multiplatform publishers have done this at the start of just about every new generation. Suddenly it's a big deal, I guess.

Yup and I'd like to know why :|
HD collections and remasters are useful and important.
They help new gamers to play something they didn't years ago, they help those who had another console to play the games without being forced to buy an old console, they are also good for those who want to play a better version of a game they loved.
If I go out right now in a movie store, I bet I would find movies from 1980s, even remastered in HD, in DVD and BD. I myself bought a couple of Blu Ray movies that I had in DVD and it was damn worth it. This is something that rarely happens with games and even if I find one I have to own the console, I could purchase it on eBay but I doubt the average customer would do that.
You could argue that a better solution exists and it's called backward compatibility but it's another thing and unfortunately it's easier said than done sometimes.
These collections are a good way to keep alive great games over the years. Not all of them, that would be crazy, just the best ones. One year or 5 or 15 after the first release makes no difference, I would buy tomorrow more than a game from Wii if it has a decent HD makeup as well as Vanquish 1080p 60fps on PC or RE Rebirth and so on.
The only bad thing is that they take time and resources away from new projects, I can understand that.. but that's all.
 
Last of Us and GTA V remasters will def. be part of my collection. No trading in at all. I fucking didnt finish last of us or GTA V on purpose!
 

benjammin

Member
If they've already sold you, why should they?

Oh I don't know, to sell the people who are on the fence? To show off the achievements that they've made? Surely you can agree that showing zero gameplay footage from a remaster whose largest improvements are visuals and gameplay improvements is disappointing? Can you imagine Square announcing a ff7 remaster and only showing off cutscenes of Aeris dying and other key cutscenes until the game is released? I trust ND enough to give them my money sight unseen, I'm just saying its a strange decision and it's unfair to show off only the spoilers from the game without any gameplay for those that haven't already played it.
 

hawk2025

Member
Oh I don't know, to sell the people who are on the fence? To show off the achievements that they've made? Surely you can agree that showing zero gameplay footage from a remaster whose largest improvements are visuals and gameplay improvements is disappointing? Can you imagine Square announcing a ff7 remaster and only showing off cutscenes of Aeris dying and other key cutscenes until the game is released? I trust ND enough to give them my money sight unseen, I'm just saying its a strange decision and it's unfair to show off only the spoilers from the game without any gameplay for those that haven't already played it.



But that's precisely the point -- those thay haven't played it have hundreds of hours of gameplay to watch.
 

StuBurns

Banned
Oh I don't know, to sell the people who are on the fence? To show off the achievements that they've made? Surely you can agree that showing zero gameplay footage from a remaster whose largest improvements are visuals and gameplay improvements is disappointing? Can you imagine Square announcing a ff7 remaster and only showing off cutscenes of Aeris dying and other key cutscenes until the game is released? I trust ND enough to give them my money sight unseen, I'm just saying its a strange decision and it's unfair to show off only the spoilers from the game without any gameplay for those that haven't already played it.
Honestly I think releasing gameplay footage is completely pointless, and no, I don't think it would improve sales whatsoever.

Firstly there is the issue of the medium with which people would view the footage. Predominantly it would be YT, which incurs hugely damaging compression artifacts to seriously compromise the visual aspect of the comparison, and it is limited to 30fps, obviously completely missing the performance aspect. So anyone watching this hypothetical footage on YT is going to be under the impression the upgrade is not particularly notable at all. But of course YT isn't the only answer, for the informed and quality concerned around these parts, they know of Gamersyde, downloading directly linked videos ND could host (although their site completely shit itself due to the very first little teaser video).

So who's benefiting from this video? The people who know about Gamersyde, and have a PC which can comfortably display 1080p/60fps video, or they could copy it to a PS3 and play it back. That audience is not only fairly small, they're also informed enough that they know exactly what to expect from a Remaster and if they want it or not.

I see no benefit to releasing a video, and plenty of downsides.
 
The Last the of Us? Just a sign that the industry is getting too lazy to make games, so they just remaster 1 year old games.

So, it was laziness that brought us DVD versions of films already released on VHS. How do you feel about Blu-ray Criterion releases?

I am down for remastered versions of any and all celebrated classics.
 

truth411

Member
The Last the of Us? Just a sign that the industry is getting too lazy to make games, so they just remaster 1 year old games.

Serious question, do you consider Game of the Year edition of games, that come with the game + all D.L.C. on the disc for $50 usually a year from initial release (which is pretty standard) lazy? Also what if on top of that they uprezed the game an increase the frame rate aswell, why do you consider that lazy?

So what's your view on GOTY edition of games?
 

Raoh

Member
New IP would be better. I want to see them do online coop story mode and more great multiplayer like I've watched in last of us.

I want that too, which is why it's great that they have two teams, I say add a third. And a full collection doesn't have to be priority. Start it now, the departments with downtime or in between games can take turns on it until the next project takes priority, release a full collection toward end of life of PS4.

I'm sure a new IP would be just as welcomed but fans of halo I'm sure are happy to be getting a halo collection. But it depends on what studios/games you like. A Platinum games collection would be useless to me but probably excites everyone else.

New IP's should always be a priority but I love a good remastered game as well if it's a game or series I've enjoyed more than the new IP's released.
 

benjammin

Member
Honestly I think releasing gameplay footage is completely pointless, and no, I don't think it would improve sales whatsoever.

Firstly there is the issue of the medium with which people would view the footage. Predominantly it would be YT, which incurs hugely damaging compression artifacts to seriously compromise the visual aspect of the comparison, and it is limited to 30fps, obviously completely missing the performance aspect. So anyone watching this hypothetical footage on YT is going to be under the impression the upgrade is not particularly notable at all. But of course YT isn't the only answer, for the informed and quality concerned around these parts, they know of Gamersyde, downloading directly linked videos ND could host (although their site completely shit itself due to the very first little teaser video).

So who's benefiting from this video? The people who know about Gamersyde, and have a PC which can comfortably display 1080p/60fps video, or they could copy it to a PS3 and play it back. That audience is not only fairly small, they're also informed enough that they know exactly what to expect from a Remaster and if they want it or not.

I see no benefit to releasing a video, and plenty of downsides.

Agree to disagree. I would much prefer to see the improvements that have been made as opposed to a bunch of spoiler filled cutscenes. But I certainly see your point and agree that most people who wanted to see the footage would watch on YT. I just think that there's a better way to show off the game than showing all the most important moments from cutscenes.

Anyway, no more thread crapping from me. Looking forward to playing through again and sinking my teeth into the mp for more than the few minutes that I put in on ps3.
 
It's so weird that people are pissed that TLoU's remaster's coming out merely a year later, yet everyone's so excited for GTAV's re-release a year later.
 

giphy.gif
 

StuBurns

Banned
Not in my opinion.

AFAIR locked has meant you don't drop. Capped means you never exceed.
I've literally never seen someone say 60 capped, but maybe that is the case.

Although virtually nothing will never drop a single frame.

Every game I know of with 'unlock framerate option' means they remove the high cap. It goes from maxing at 30 to whatever the pipeline can handle.
 

AmyS

Member
Last of Us and GTA V remasters will def. be part of my collection. No trading in at all. I fucking didnt finish last of us or GTA V on purpose!

I have yet to play Last of Us or GTA V on last gen consoles.

The PS4 remasters will be the first time I experience those games.

I'm already glad I waited.
 

benny_a

extra source of jiggaflops
I've literally never seen someone say 60 capped, but maybe that is the case.

Although virtually nothing will never drop a single frame.

Every game I know of with 'unlock framerate option' means they remove the high cap. It goes from maxing at 30 to whatever the pipeline can handle.
To be fair, you can't just make a "lock framerate option" that makes it so your game doesn't drop frames. You need to be above 30 under every stress related scenario to be able to cap it at 30 and thus have the result be locked at 30.

But yeah, people use different terms for the same concepts. I prefer the terms I used because there is a distinction there.

Not that I personally care for this that much. Frame rate is not even in the top 3 things I care about when even talking technical aspects of my favorite genre. (Third person action adventures.)
 

Djin1979

Member
Today I saw someone playing it at Video games story (a vg exhibition in Paris). It looked decent, clean image but nothing more. Don't expect something totally different from the ps3 version. The framerate looked 30ish to me.
 
Today I saw someone playing it at Video games story (a vg exhibition in Paris). It looked decent, clean image but nothing more. Don't expect something totally different from the ps3 version. The framerate looked 30ish to me.

Wasn't a finished build though I agree completely that people should keep their expectations in check.
 

Sharpeye

Member
Today I saw someone playing it at Video games story (a vg exhibition in Paris). It looked decent, clean image but nothing more. Don't expect something totally different from the ps3 version. The framerate looked 30ish to me.
Seeing how they are still in dev and have not shown a gameplay snippet, I believe you saw the ps3 version on psnow. Might be dead wrong though.
 

Hubb

Member
Seeing how they are still in dev and have not shown a gameplay snippet, I believe you saw the ps3 version on psnow. Might be dead wrong though.

I am willing to believe that. If there was real PS4 gameplay out in the wild it would be hitting the media blogs by now.
 

Djin1979

Member
Seeing how they are still in dev and have not shown a gameplay snippet, I believe you saw the ps3 version on psnow. Might be dead wrong though.

Ps now is not available in Europe, so I think it was the ps4 version, the IQ was much better than the ps3 version. Not sure if it was the final build though.
 

Saberus

Member
Ps now is not available in Europe, so I think it was the ps4 version, the IQ was much better than the ps3 version. Not sure if it was the final build though.

Sorry, I call BS on this.. its not like ND going to let this out for people to play yet.
 

Hubb

Member
Sorry, I call BS on this.. its not like ND going to let this out for people to play yet.

I'll also call BS on it, or at least question it. I just looked up Video Game Story and it seems to run from 6/30-9/7. I guess it could be open early or something, but everywhere I see to buy tickets has those dates.
 
Top Bottom