Skittzo0413
Member
I think back to that thread a few days back where they asked if reviews were always objective. I think these review scores provide a ready answer.
There's nothing I've seen listed in any of these reviews which blows your mind. No boundary pushing depth or complexity, no underheard of mechanics. The story telling remains rote, the technical perfomance is acceptable and there's the usual mixture of combat, traversal and puzzles.
There's no redefining of the open world scenario and nothing in the combat which is radically different from what we've seen before. Why the perfect 10s? What kind of otherworldly achievement would merit that? Simply being a Zelda game in a critical forum who's leading voices grew up with Ocarina of Time.
That's my takeaway.
If that's what you're getting from these reviews then I'm pretty sure you're either not reading or not paying attention.
One of the most common aspects to these reviews is the thought that when you ask the question "can I do this?" in the game the answer is almost always "yes" which is not something we've ever seen in a game like this. The complexity of the systems and mechanics is essentially unheard of.
Plus, when have you ever been able to climb literally anything in an open world game (that's not named Spiderman)?