That's a whoopin.
Yes it was. And deserving. Both batting looked bad, except for sensational cook innings. Pak needs to change its line up. NO Malik and Farhat please.
That's a whoopin.
29.1 Malinga to Dhoni, 1 run, 137.5 kph, opens the face of the bat and runs it down to third man
29.2 Malinga to Gambhir, FOUR, 135.8 kph, nicely controlled! Short delivery rising on the shoulder and Gambhir moved across and controlled the pull well down to fine leg on one leg
29.3 Malinga to Gambhir, 1 run, 138.2 kph, straight on the pads and he clips it away down to square leg
29.4 Malinga to Dhoni, 2 runs, 140.8 kph, low full toss on the pads and he clips it down towards deep square leg
29.5 Malinga to Dhoni, 1 run, 129.5 kph, short and wide and he slashes it down to square third man, the fielder does really well to sprint across and fire in the throw, limits it to just a single
Just a 5-ball over?
Surely this has to be reviewed and if so, India should be awarded the win?Going back to the 30th over, it was scored as a five-ball over. Did the umpires miss out that one ball? It still is a mystery.
Surely this has to be reviewed and if so, India should be awarded the win?
DRS, which in it's current state is a joke IMO. I've got nothing against playing within preset, agreed rules.I thought you were against reviews.
cricinfo said:India don't want to create controversy about the five-ball 30th over that may or may not have made a difference to the final result of a tight game, a tie. However, it gave MS Dhoni an opportunity to raise the question that, with so much technology available, why couldn't the officials ensure the proper counting of balls, and why blindly follow the DRS?
The essence of Dhoni's comments, though, was that this could easily be turned into a controversy but he didn't want to do so. "Duncan [Fletcher, the coach] told me about it," Dhoni said. "There have been five-ball overs in the past, but we have seen the third umpire interfere and you have to come back and bowl that ball. Usually that's what has happened to us also. It didn't happen in this game, fair enough. Nothing much can be done now.
"I don't know [if a full over might have broken the tie] because you could have had a dot ball. It happens in cricket, so maybe it would have been a dot."
Dhoni said India were not going to lodge an official complaint. "Well because it's done and dusted," he said. "That's what is important. We can create a big fuss out of it but what's the point? It's like a controversy standing right at the edge, just about to happen, because we have seen in the past that we have bowled an over and they have almost changed ends. But then the third umpire interferes and says, 'Okay you have to bowl one more ball in this particular over". It didn't happen in this game. I don't know why. We don't really want to create a controversy."
As an afterthought, Dhoni took a dig at DRS. "If this can happen then I don't know why people back DRS so much," Dhoni said. "We have seen people happy with DRS in one series as long as it goes in their favour. Once it doesn't go in their favour, they are quite unhappy about it so. I am quite happy with three individuals. If I am not wrong, two umpires in the middle and the match referee and the scorer [are there], and it has still happened. Better off accepting it because we humans are bound to make mistakes."
The said over was, at that time, the second best of India's innings. Gautam Gambhir and Dhoni had taken nine off Malinga when over was called after five balls. Mahela Jayawardene, Sri Lanka's captain, said he didn't know of the error. "I am not complaining," he joked.
DRS, which in it's current state is a joke IMO. I've got nothing against playing within preset, agreed rules.
22.1 Law 22.5 Umpire miscounting
Whenever possible the third umpire shall liaise with the scorers and if possible inform the on-field umpires if the over has been miscounted.
Except as varied hereunder the Laws of Cricket (2000 Code 2nd Edition - 2003) shall apply.
5. Umpire miscounting
(a) If the umpire miscounts the number of valid balls, the over as counted by the umpire shall stand.
2. Start of an over
An over has started when the bowler starts his run up or, if he has no run up, his action for the first delivery of that over.
This pdf has only:That part of the rules is exactly the same as
in.yimg.com/icccricket/pdfs/odi_playing_conditions.pdf
bit i chose the other link since you don't have to download a pdf.
gg.
Whenever possible the third umpire shall liaise with the scorers and if possible inform the on-field umpires if the over has been miscounted.
My gifs are like oscars compared to the trash you come up with.Haha. Never let the truth get in the way of deploying a juvenile gif.
Which was not followed .. You poor soul, didnt have to shoot yourself in the mouth ..
Which main rules? I dont see the main rules mentioning the use of two new balls? /zing sorry your assWhenever possible, it was obviously missed at the time which means that as soon as the next over starts the over stands as was counted according to the main rules. No reviews sorry.
Dhoni said:It's done and dusted with. We can create a big fuss out of it but what's the point? It's like a controversy standing right on the edge...just about to happen. What's the point as it's a controversy which is right there and we don't really want to get into anything like that...Hopefully, it won't be repeated, not only with us but not even with any other side.
Obviously this was a huge miss, in such a tight game. The fact that India isnt making a fuss about it doesnt mean its a-okay.
Part of the rules .. where? Like I said and you have failed to show, I havent seen the preset rules for this tournament. You also missed the big question mark at the end of my post.I didn't say it was OK. I was saying that it was part of the rules that it cannot be reviewed, which you were calling for as part of the rules.
Part of the rules .. where? Like I said and you have failed to show, I havent seen the preset rules for this tournament. You also missed the big question mark at the end of my post.
5. Umpire miscounting
(a) If the umpire miscounts the number of valid balls, the over as counted by the umpire shall stand.
I dont see any of it from ICC. Anyway, I think your straw-man argument to my question has gone more distance than it should have. Feel free to PM me if you want to take it further.Go back and look at my first post with links to the ICC rules it's right there
I dont see any of it from ICC. Anyway, I think your straw-man argument to my question has gone more distance than it should have. Feel free to PM me if you want to take it further.
Except as varied hereunder the Laws of Cricket (2000 Code 2nd Edition - 2003) shall apply.
5. Umpire miscounting
(a) If the umpire miscounts the number of valid balls, the over as counted by the umpire shall stand.
Yeah, I've got me eye on him .. the new Finn looks very promising.Finn really took the criticism that got him out of the test squad to heart and has been making great leaps in improving. Excellent.
Has anyone ever scored three consecutive centuries?