Salazar said::lol ??
Grug said:
Salazar said:How did I read his Wikipedia page and miss that ?
God damn. At least we'll always have Aggers. And Kerry. And Jim.
Are you implying Gilly was anything but an honest cricketer? Really, Salazar?Salazar said:Should have claimed it, Prior. Gilchrist would have thrown that sucker up.
Salazar said:Should have claimed it, Prior. Gilchrist would have thrown that sucker up.
matt404au said:Are you implying Gilly was anything but an honest cricketer? Really, Salazar?
matt404au said:Salazar, I just noticed you changed your avatar again. Damn, you have the worst avatars -_-
matt404au said:All of the above, but that's irrelevant. What the hell is a dancing Tiffany anyway?
Not having a great replacement is no excuse to keep him. Both Ponting and Clarke should be gone after this series, Ponting permanently, Clarke until he shows some maturity and form. In the meantime, try a few other players in the Captain and Vice Captain roles, see who does well. Nobody can be worse than the current pair. No leadership, and no form. I was all for keeping Waugh as captain even when his form was struggling because he provided such great leadership, but Ponting contributes nothing if he cannot get runs.Mr_Moogle said:This is probably the worst Australian test side in 30 years. Theres no runs coming from the top order and our bowling attack can only manage patches of brilliance.
The blame must be placed on the top order batsmen. Watson, Hussey and Haddin are the only aussie batsmen to make any runs. Ponting, Clarke and Hughes are all dead wood and havent contributed at all this series.
I dont know how Phil Hughes is there when there are more in form batsmen at domestic level. Ponting would be gone already if he wasnt captain but you can hardly replace him with Clarke who is equally as out of form.
After the world cup, ricky has to go. Selectors need to start blooding our younger players. We need to give test experience to players like Ferguson, Kawaja etc.
Gilchrist is right now my fav Aussie but he didnt have a squeaky clean record either, despite having walked on many occasions .. But yeah if we're counting 'honest' cricketers, he would figure in there.matt404au said:Are you implying Gilly was anything but an honest cricketer? Really, Salazar?
Edit: Self Avatar Quote
Close .. better buy a lottery ticket next timeKozak said:So..
bets on Pontings exit?
I say...15 runs?
RandomVince said:Clarke's most recent test innings:
vs England:
9, DNB, 2, 80, 4, 20, 20, 13
vs India:
14, 3, 14, 4
vs Pakistan:
3, 77, 47, 12
15 innings, avg of 21.47
Drop him.
Edit: by comparison, Marcus North:
vs England 26, 22, 1
vs Pakistan 16, 0, 0, 20
vs India 128, 3, 0, 10
11 innings at 20.55
Both about as mediocre as each other.
More at the link.The thing is, Australia is now the cricket equivalent of Richmond, who were laughingly seen by their fans to have had a much improved AFL season despite finishing second last on the ladder.
One win and weve got tickets on ourselves. Such is the sad state of Australian cricket.
In part, our decline is an inevitable cyclical dip. Partly its bad selections, partly its the vibe and partly its the rise of other nations - with India, South Africa and now England all packed with top performers at present.
But the one thread through each of Australias failed Ashes campaigns in 2005, 2009 and and 2010/11 is Ponting. Clearly, as I wrote in this piece, he is not the man to bond a winning team by instilling belief in individuals, as Englands impressive skipper Andrew Strauss has done.
Cricket Australia is loathe to sack him as captain, for 101 reasons covering everything from marketing to team stability.
But the best marketed, most stable institution in the world is worthless if the bottom line isnt delivering and the stakeholders are raging. Ralph Norris would be the first to tell you that.
If Ponting doesnt have the good grace and common sense to resign as captain after Melbourne, heres hoping CA chief James Sutherland has the guts to do what 95 per cent of his stakeholders want.
Dead, didnt you get the memo? Anthony Sharwood is a "demented pervert".Dead Man said:
irfan said:Dead, didnt you get the memo? Anthony Sharwood is a "demented pervert".
I thought that was Peter Roebuck. I must have missed the memo.irfan said:Dead, didnt you get the memo? Anthony Sharwood is a "demented pervert".
Nah, I'm just mocking Gruggy for being so butthurt over some one who was a critic of Australian cricket .. I'm guessing his list will increase exponentially after this series is done.RandomVince said:No, that was roebuck. Your hate of australia is blinding you.
irfan said:Nah, I'm just mocking Gruggy for being so butthurt over some one who was a critic of Australian cricket .. I'm guessing his list will increase exponentially after this series is done.
Btw any wagers on the margin of victory?
Salazar said:My anti-Australian boner comes and goes. So to speak.
Thats an easy call. I'm talking about the mighty Ashes.Rezbit said:South Africa to win by 6 wickets.
Just because you think he's a knob doesnt make him a knob, does it? Just like how this is what I perceive you to be in real but doesnt mean you are really like that .. :lolGrug said:<rubbish>
Roebuck is a knob, always has been, always will be. If you want to throw in with the buttock caner, go ahead. I could use a derivation of your same munted logic and say that you'll naturally gravitate to anyone who strokes that anti-Australian boner of yours (your list will increase after this series) but I'm better than that (you).
We're not talking about the other Aussies in this thread who by the way have some balls to show up in this thread despite the poor performance on field. We're talking about you and your delusional little world.Grug said:The Australian posters in this thread have been pretty scathing in their assessment of the performance of the Australian team yet you seem to keep the blinkers on and pretend that we are all chest-thumping delusionals who refuse to accept that the Australians aren't world beaters, if only so you can keep your little nationalist bravado thing happening. Like I said, take that shit to YouTube comments with the other frothy-mouthed ferals.
Racism? WTF was I racist? In fact it was you first who posted a rat and said it was India .. you're the troll and I was the bait then. The only reason you didnt get a ban then was that your posse is large. I have only learnt to not bite your trolls while you have remained the same .. enough of the rant. Keep it to PM and dont derail the thread with your rants. If you cant handle a joke and then dont bother coming in here.Grug said:You aren't a lost cause. We got you to ease off on the racism over time. Now if we can get you to elevate your contributions into something in the vicinity of "insightful" we'll be off and running.
Grug said:Then there is the Ricky factor... is Melbourne his last test match? Will he get a swansong at Sydney? Or will the selectors not eliminate him entirely from the possibility of playing in further tests.
matt404au said:Corey Worthington? Seriously?
Irfan said:Racism? WTF was I racist? In fact it was you first who posted a rat and said it was India ..
Irfan said:you're the troll and I was the bait then.
irfan said:We're not talking about the other Aussies in this thread who by the way have some balls to show up in this thread despite the poor performance on field. We're talking about you and your delusional little world.
irfan said:Keep it to PM and dont derail the thread with your rants.
Irfan said:If you cant handle a joke and then dont bother coming in here.
Salazar said:I reckon he'll retire. I wouldn't bet five dollars on it, but I reckon he'll go.
Salazar said:If the selectors don't experiment on a dead rubber, they're crazy as well as stupid.
Hokay ... :lolGrug said:You've been corrected on this once before. The roadkill rat was referring to the ease of negotiating the Indian "roadblock" (your words), not India itself. This was entirely clear and evident in the context of the thread.
Like you I'll excuse myself by saying that I meant it in a different context and you and others got their panties in a bunch. "See what I did thar"If there was any confusion, it has now twice been clarified. Very little room for misunderstanding, much like someone who (hypothetically) says that a country's flag would be good for wiping their posterior with.
Facts are facts. Look how many times I'm here on an Indian defeat and how many times you and your posse show up when you're thoroughly humiliated.More childish rubbish. When did I go missing? Am I not here on the day England will seal the Ashes? This is exactly what I was referring to with you and your blinkers. You have formed ignporant little characterisations of posters in your head and no facts will deviate you from that course. Your inability to enjoy the game of cricket without stirring in schadenfreude or boorish keyboard aggression is baffling.
Your public rant required a public retort. I asked you to keep the thread clean from there on which if you could keep your knickers dry, would have done by now ..Says irfan in a public post. I look forward to your PM.
You flame baiting in the OP doesnt exclude my from posting in this thread. I'm purely here because of my interest and love for Cricket.I believe I started this thread, visitor. If you can't handle people calling you out on your childishness, don't bother coming in here. See what I did thar?
So, no experiments then?Salazar said:I reckon he'll retire. I wouldn't bet five dollars on it, but I reckon he'll go.
If the selectors don't experiment on a dead rubber, they're crazy as well as stupid.