Can you make a video using that lens, preferably of you moving forward while filming? From the looks of it that's going to look trippy as hell.345triangle said:so here are some SLR magic shots i took on the way to and from work today:
anyway as you can see it's, uh, quirky.
Lord Error said:Can you make a video using that lens, preferably of you moving forward while filming? From the looks of it that's going to look trippy as hell.
Stalfos said:Yeah that thing is incredibly soft around the edges.
It does?! How do you set that up?345triangle said:i have one, don't use it a lot but it's as much tripod as i need. it's a great thing to be able to throw into a bag even if you're not sure you'll need it.
plus it makes a good ipad stand!
Thanks! Do you think the gorillapod will be able to support an iPad if you use the suction cup clip? Can you rotate it?345triangle said:like so:
345triangle said:so here are some SLR magic shots i took on the way to and from work today:
pics
kept them small for minimal annoyance but you can see them full-size if you want at http://345triangle.tumblr.com
anyway as you can see it's, uh, quirky.
scorcho said:sad to hear that Oly's leaving the entry-mid level DSLR segment. now, to sell my E520 gear or not...
giga said:I didn't realize people still used 4/3.
its actually not but i think you should just switch if it concerns you that much.AlteredBeast said:The E-5 they announced is kind of a joke spec wise compared to the price range on the market from Nikon or Canon.
Charred Greyface said:Thanks! Do you think the gorillapod will be able to support an iPad if you use the suction cup clip? Can you rotate it?
UnluckyKate said:Damn, I love that bokeh effect all around your pictures. Is it the lens or post prod ?
MickD said:Considering the D3100. Heard there is no stereo sound? WTF? This will be a deal breaker for me. I'm mainly buying it for video and a still camera second.
Thoughts? Do not want to go to Canon.
Depending on what kind of video you're going to be making, you could always record sound separate into a digital recorder. I've got the Zoom H4N and like it a lot, although phantom power can drain the batteries quick.MickD said:Considering the D3100. Heard there is no stereo sound? WTF? This will be a deal breaker for me. I'm mainly buying it for video and a still camera second.
Thoughts? Do not want to go to Canon.
Using the built-in mic for any quality audio is not an option anyway so it shouldn't be a deal breaker. That said, if you're mainly buying a DSLR for video it is odd to rule out Canon.MickD said:Considering the D3100. Heard there is no stereo sound? WTF? This will be a deal breaker for me. I'm mainly buying it for video and a still camera second.
Thoughts? Do not want to go to Canon.
Panasonic IS the company that does it best.callous said:If video is your main thing, it seems rather foolish to rule out the company that so far does video the best.
Anyway, how about a GH1 or upcoming GH2?
callous said:If video is your main thing, it seems rather foolish to rule out the company that so far does video the best.
Anyway, how about a GH1 or upcoming GH2?
345triangle said:NEX actually uses a bigger format than micro 4/3rds, despite the smaller body size..
Danielsan said:Would it a Nikon 50mm f1.8 be a good lens to get for getting the narrow depth of field photographs that I want?
Great. Thanks for the fast response.BlueTsunami said:Yes. All fast 50's are pretty much act as an entry level lens to Thin Depth of Field photography.
Danielsan said:And are there any other tools and items that are essential for beginners?
Any particular recommendations given that I have a relatively tight budget? :lolMickD said:Tripod. Cleaning cloths.
MickD said:Tripod. Cleaning cloths.
Danielsan said:The D3100 came with a 18mm-55mm f3.5/5.5 kit-lens which will probably serve me fine for the time being as I try to get basics of exposure and composition down, but I'm really into photography with a narrow depth of field. Would a Nikon 50mm f1.8 be a good lens to get for getting the narrow depth of field photographs that I want?
Valkyr Junkie said:Maybe look into some basic filters as well.
This seems like really sound advice, thanks. I will definitely play around with the kit lens to see whether I'd prefer a 35mm lens. The 35mm is about twice as expensive, but still within an acceptable range as far a lens prices are concerned.chaostrophy said:Another lens to consider would be the Nikkor 35/1.8 DX. A bit more expensive, with DoF slightly less thin than a 50/1.8, but IMO 35 is a more overall useful focal length on a crop camera than 50. Maybe try setting your kit zoom to 50, shooting for a while without zooming in or out, then setting it to 35 and doing the same, to get an idea of the perspective and "feel" of the two focal lengths before buying a prime lens.
Alucrid said:So the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 is out of stock on Amazon and I was really hoping to get it tomorrow with 1 day shipping since I'm heading to the beach tomorrow night. Are there any other lenses just as good that I can get off Amazon? I really want a nice fixed lens to play around with down there.
They have it for $105.50 from Willoughby's but its fulfilled through Amazon so you can get 1 day shipping.Alucrid said:So the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 is out of stock on Amazon and I was really hoping to get it tomorrow with 1 day shipping since I'm heading to the beach tomorrow night. Are there any other lenses just as good that I can get off Amazon? I really want a nice fixed lens to play around with down there.
Stalfos said:They have it for $105.50 from Willoughby's but its fulfilled through Amazon so you can get 1 day shipping.
mrnorush said:hitler is not happy with d7000 shipping late
http://vimeo.com/15830670
When exporting, there's a checkbox that says "minimize embedded metadata". This option should keep extra fluff like that down to a minimum.captive said:Lightroom experts, is there anyway i can tell lightroom to automatically strip the caption from photos when importing them from the camera? OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA is annoying to have to take off of all pictures i export or if i forget its more annoying to have to take it off as the caption on flickr/my website.
345triangle said:i would say it's as good a point and shoot as you're going to get, but for that kind of money you should be really really sure that a point and shoot is what you want considering you already have one.
Have you also considered the Panasonic LX5? It's a little pricier and a little more bulkier, but provides more manual control and a little more wider angle if that's what you're looking for. I just got it for my wife just recently, I'm amazed at how much you can do with it for a compact point and shoot.gimmmick said:Thinking about purchasing a canon powershot s95 to replace my current point and shoot. Is it a good buy for 400? (seems expensive for a point and shoot camera, but my other canon lasted me 4 years and was very happy with my investment). I heard the biggest upgraded from last year was the 720p recording.
GamePnoy74 said:Have you also considered the Panasonic LX5? It's a little pricier and a little more bulkier, but provides more manual control and a little more wider angle if that's what you're looking for. I just got it for my wife just recently, I'm amazed at how much you can do with it for a compact point and shoot.
But yeah, invest in a higher-end P&S if you're going to take advantage of its more advanced features...if not, save your cash and stick with your current P&S for now (unless you like to have a smaller form factor than what you have...just get a cheaper, smaller camera overall).