The Incarnation
Member
Double dip.
They'll probably blame the weather.
They'll probably blame the weather.
At least we've still got that! (For a bit longer)
At least we've still got that! (For a bit longer)
But don't worry, once we cut corporation tax back some more, we'll give companies even more of a chance to hoard even more vast reserves of cash... er, I mean invest millions into British jobs and infrastructure.
PMQs should be fun.
Double dip.
They'll probably blame the weather.
GDP down .2%, the UK is in recession. Interested to hear thoughts re this.
Oh okay. Serious People are blaming the data instead of the shitty economic policies.
I don't know what the ONS are doing but pretty much every major bank and financial institution around these parts are dumbfounded right now. This can't be right, it just can't be. The employment and PMI statistics (the former of which is theirs) points to Q1 growth of at least 0.3%, looking at the detail, total industrial output is down a massive 3% QoQ, which doesn't make sense since the last Index we got said there was a huge rise in oil and gas production, higher than manufacturing production (which is up slightly) and that hasn't been restated, so where did it all go?
Construction data is still a complete mess (and accounts for -0.2% worth of contraction), I suggest the ONS don't bother with preliminary construction data and only release final statistics when they have a better handle on the statistics. Of the last two quarters, construction has accounted for -0.4% contraction out of the total -0.5%, but there are a bunch of caveats we got today that basically said, that -0.4% over the past two quarters is still just the best estimate and will probably get restated down the line (probably to 0%) they just haven't really figured out how to do it so are erring on the side of caution.
Right now these figures don't make sense which is why the index isn't down and there has been no real movement in sovereign and corporate bond prices. With unemployment starting to come down it points to real economic growth, and with the March retail figures so strong (following a poor Feb, surprisingly enough) there just can't have been a contraction this quarter. It honestly doesn't make sense. At this point, if I were the Chancellor, I would sack the lot of them and move it from Newport to Manchester and hire out of the sciences rather than economics. The announcement of a recession that likely never happened will do profound damage to the economy, and as of now it rests entirely on the ONS.
The figures don't make sense. That's why the markets are unmoved, no big sell off. The policies haven't really made much difference to this anyway, in the figures, government services added 0.1% to growth. It's the production and construction figures that don't make sense, they don't add up with other ONS data, the production figures are very odd, I mean how can they say in Feb that oil and gas output grew by 2% MoM while also saying in the GDP release that it fell QoQ without having the March index ready. Their own index disagrees with their statistics. How can the economy have added jobs from Dec-Feb if the economy actually contracted, that kind of stuff happens very, very rarely.
Right now the ONS have a lot of questions to answer, either their previous data was wrong and about 6 months worth needs to be restated and revised, or the GDP figures are wrong and need to be restated and revised. Their own data conflicts with the GDP figures, that is why the markets haven't taken it seriously. If the ONS came out tomorrow and said that all of the Indices are to be revised downwards and unemployment upwards because of some errors then there would be serious movement in the markets as it would really mean Britain has entered a recession. As of now most here see it as a statistical anomaly which will probably get fixed about a year from now when the ONS go back on "historical data" and redo the sums. It happens pretty often, American banks don't trust ONS data for this reason and trust their own statistics, so do we, and our statistics say 0.3% growth for Q1 and -0.1% contraction for Q4.
Well this is all a fair point, given the solid gold track record of banks on matters economic.
Thank's for playing the man and not the ball. If you have a problem with what I am saying then point it out, that I work for a bank (which actually didn't lose money on the sub-prime market) should have no bearing on what I say.
Hunt is resigning apparently, according to the BBC ticker on the leveson inquiry.
Thank's for playing the man and not the ball. If you have a problem with what I am saying then point it out, that I work for a bank (which actually didn't lose money on the sub-prime market) should have no bearing on what I say.
Economy will never recover while fuel costs are so ridiculously high.
He is just saying that banks/you/Cameron/Osborne are fallible.
there isn't any need to sack the ONS or pay northerners peanuts, just admit you are wrong about austerity..
THE MESS THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT LEFT TWO WHOLE YEARS AGO CAUSED THIS RECESSION.
god, he actually did blame labour there.
What the hell Ed? He should have destroyed Cameron on the ONS data but moved on to the Leveson Inquiry after two questions or something.
ed didn't even have to mention Jeremy Cunt.
clegg looks like he's just thinking "FUCK THIS"
I just read that he had only two questions on the economy and four (FOUR!) on Hunt? Is this true?!?!
Fucking idiot. I hate the government but the opposition are fucking useless. On the day that, officially at least, Britain has entered a recession the opposition ask only two fucking questions about the economy to the most important man in the country is an absolute fucking disgrace. What the fuck is he thinking about, the 2.5m unemployed people don't give a shit about Hunt and NI, they want answers on why government policy is so fucking shitty and why the coalition government is so fucking complacent about it all.