Nexus Zero said:Anybody gotten angry about this shit: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jun/10/cherie-booth-cleared-court-comment ?
Now I have. That is discriminatory. Ah, the justice system.
Nexus Zero said:Anybody gotten angry about this shit: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jun/10/cherie-booth-cleared-court-comment ?
Nexus Zero said:Anybody gotten angry about this shit: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jun/10/cherie-booth-cleared-court-comment ?
Cherie Booth will not be disciplined after she was cleared over comments she made while sparing a violent offender jail.
Several complaints were made over a case the wife of former prime minister Tony Blair dealt with while sitting as a judge at Inner London crown court.
She told Shamso Miah, a devout Muslim, that he would not go to prison after breaking a man's jaw "based on the fact you are a religious person".
A spokeswoman said: "That investigation has concluded and found that Recorder Booth's observations did not constitute judicial misconduct.
Nexus Zero said:Anybody gotten angry about this shit: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jun/10/cherie-booth-cleared-court-comment ?
SmokyDave said:I almost did but then I saw the guy went down for 6 months.
Makes one wonder why on earth she'd make such a comment in the first place.
Edit: Hang on, hang. the. fuck. on...
So, she let the guy off going to prison purely because he is religious? Nothing more?
And this is not judicial misconduct? The complaints have no merit? Religious people are held to a different standard and that's ok?
Is my reading comprehension failing me here?
I appreciate what you are saying and I understand there are more factors taken into account when arriving at these decisions but for me, a judge seemingly deciding that 'religion = automatic morality' is worth fussing over.phisheep said:Not really. There are all manner of things that keep people out of jail for otherwise imprisonable offences, such as dependant relatives, previous good character, jobs and so on. All comes down to risk of re-offending really, and here he has a suspended sentence, which is a jolly good incentive to keep his nose clean as it will get triggered if he does anything else.
By the sounds of it he's a first-time offender on a charge of (probably unintentional) ABH, with previous good character who elected for Crown Court trial (since the sentence is otherwise within the Magistrates' powers) believing he had a reasonable chance of being found not guilty - so probably the facts aren't all that clear-cut either.
So, although Recorder Booth's comment is an archetypal example of judicial foot-in-mouth and it shouldn't really have been worded that way (though bear in mind we don't have the full report and it may be out of context) I can't see that it amounts to misconduct or discrimination as the outcome would probably been the same if she hadn't said that.
Nothing to make a fuss about really.
Ah, the truth that dare not speak it's name no matter how apparent its face becomes. I wasn't going to go there but, yes, indeed.operon said:I wouldn't per se religious people more just particular religions
It's rather unfair of people to claim that Abbott is 'vacuous' and 'empty headed'. She has been an outspoken supporter of civil liberties and a number of other issues like trident. Even the darling of the right, David Davis said that her robust defence of civil liberties was "one of the finest speeches I have heard".Sir Fragula said:I could live with a Milliband in power. Preferably Ed. Diane Abbot has made a career out of being a black woman in politics with nothing of substance behind her. She's just vacuous.
I would have hoped that the last thirteen years would have ruled you out of supporting Labour for a long time. All of the candidates bar Abbott, are associated with the ancien regime. Labour deserves to be out of power for two terms at least, to allow them a root and branch reformation and a proper rethink about their values.Mr. Sam said:The BBC coverage of her was disgraceful. "All the other candidates are white men but, holy shit, this one's a black woman. Quick, everyone surrender your votes to our new overlord."
Abbott as Labour leader would rule me out of supporting that party for a long time.
SmokyDave said:I appreciate what you are saying and I understand there are more factors taken into account when arriving at these decisions but for me, a judge seemingly deciding that 'religion = automatic morality' is worth fussing over.
The guy was in front of her for breaking someones jaw in a bank queue and she thinks the fact he's watched over by Allah means it's ok to release him? Because it's obviously going to keep him on the straight and narrow, right?
Her comments have lead me to believe that if I were to find myself in the same position as this man, our justice system would punish me for not believing in god. I really don't see how she has avoided having to explain her comments in full (apologising to the non-religious community for the implication of our second rate morals might not hurt either).
Basically, what a fucking stupid thing to say.
SmokyDave said:I almost did but then I saw the guy went down for 6 months.
Makes one wonder why on earth she'd make such a comment in the first place.
Edit: Hang on, hang. the. fuck. on...
So, she let the guy off going to prison purely because he is religious? Nothing more?
And this is not judicial misconduct? The complaints have no merit? Religious people are held to a different standard and that's ok?
Is my reading comprehension failing me here?
cntrational said:According to Dutch PoliGAF, the UK apparently has a law that makes people who've had a record of violence report to police stations during football games. Is that correct?
cntrational said:According to Dutch PoliGAF, the UK apparently has a law that makes people who've had a record of violence report to police stations during football games. Is that correct?
phisheep said:Broadly correct, yes.
The Football (Disorder) Act 2000, which amends the Football Spectators Act 1989 makes provision for such things as surrender of passports and reporting to police stations. The law itself isn't explicit about when the reporting must take place - that'll be down to whatever court order is made on the individual - but typically they'll be told to report to a police station at kick-off time, which has the desired effect of making sure they are not at the match.
Raydeen said:Chapter IV. Paragraph. II. All Muslims shall be treated with cotton wool and the British way of life engineered in preparation of Sharia.
Sage00 said:Not to sound like a broken record going on about this, but is there a real need to fly the St George's Cross on Downing St. in place of the union jack for the duration of the world cup?
When Andy Murray is playing in Wimbledon do they put up a saltire for the week? No.
Sage00 said:Not to sound like a broken record going on about this, but is there a real need to fly the St George's Cross on Downing St. in place of the union jack for the duration of the world cup?
When Andy Murray is playing in Wimbledon do they put up a saltire for the week? No.
tea_and_crumpets said:Latest poll out tonight guys
Con: 40. Lab 32. Lib 18.
Also some interesting results on potential cuts.
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2718
defel1111 said:Its interesting to see Diane Abbot second to only David Milliband amongst the public and beating Ed Balls among Labour voters.
As an anti-Unionist I have no issue with the English flag being flown in England...Sage00 said:Not to sound like a broken record going on about this, but is there a real need to fly the St George's Cross on Downing St. in place of the union jack for the duration of the world cup?
When Andy Murray is playing in Wimbledon do they put up a saltire for the week? No.
Thank you. Frustratingly I understand why it would be that way. Oh well, never liked the woman anyway.phisheep said:The primary reason she hasn't explained anything is that judges are not allowed to speak out of court on cases that have been before them. They cannot answer back, cannot explain and cannot apologise.
I agree it was a fucking stupid thing to say though.
Don't you have a parliamentary building of your own to fly a flag from?Sage00 said:Not to sound like a broken record going on about this, but is there a real need to fly the St George's Cross on Downing St. in place of the union jack for the duration of the world cup?
When Andy Murray is playing in Wimbledon do they put up a saltire for the week? No.
:lolSubliminal said:This wasn't because he was muslim but because he was religious.
I think it's one of those 'There is absolutely no polygamy in the UK' things. Just best to ignore it really. To be fair, she did use the word 'religious' and any further extrapolation from that is purely speculation on our part.Enosh said::lol
wait, you actualy belive that?
How would it not make any sense? The union flag always flys there. It IS out parliamentary building. It's the office of the prime minister of the UK, not of England. They took it down and replaced it with the English flag for the period of the world cup.SmokyDave said:Don't you have a parliamentary building of your own to fly a flag from?
Flying the Union Flag wouldn't make any sense as there isn't a 'Britain' competing in the World Cup.
I completely support the creation of an English parliament with the English flag flying outside.Sir Fragula said:As an anti-Unionist I have no issue with the English flag being flown in England...
are there still people that think that?SmokyDave said:I think it's one of those 'There is absolutely no polygamy in the UK' things. Just best to ignore it really.
true and I concede on that pointTo be fair, she did use the word 'religious' and any further extrapolation from that is purely speculation on our part.
Empty said:since i've gotten home from the summer, i keep getting an earful from my dad about obama and bp. about how the horrible anti-british obama is stealing money from the poor and honest, huge multinational corporation BP who merely caused an environmental catastrophe and killed that coasts' tourism for years, is actually fully on on our side and is totally not at fault for the problem despite neglecting to do safety checks that could have prevented it. is this just a tory thing or are others annoyed by this controversy?
I wouldn't rule out the possibility of riots.Subliminal said:This will be the worst year ever.
I genuinely believe there will be actual riots
Killuminati said:I wouldn't rule out the possibility of riots.
And in other news: UK may try to stop Iceland joining EU over bank collapse refund
Empty said:is this just a tory thing or are others annoyed by this controversy?
It is completely BP's fault and they should pay the price (all of it, not just this $20 billion) for it, but Obama is playing polticial PR with the issue. Something like 1 in every 7p of the dividends that make up British pensions come from BP, and other large parts of the pension system are reliant on the BP share price (as well as several financial institutions all over the world).Empty said:since i've gotten home from the summer, i keep getting an earful from my dad about obama and bp. about how the horrible anti-british obama is stealing money from the poor and honest, huge multinational corporation BP who merely caused an environmental catastrophe and killed that coasts' tourism for years, is actually fully on on our side and is totally not at fault for the problem despite neglecting to do safety checks that could have prevented it. is this just a tory thing or are others annoyed by this controversy?
Sage00 said:Something like 1 in every 7p of the dividends that make up British pensions come from BP, and other large parts of the pension system are reliant on the BP share price
cntrational said:uh
I don't really see what you guys are seeing with BP and Obama/US. <_<
why do your pensions depend a private company
IIRC US pensions were dependant on BP shares as well, to a much lesser degree.cntrational said:uh
I don't really see what you guys are seeing with BP and Obama/US. <_<
why do your pensions depend a private company
Anyone?louis89 said:Why do we ringfence international aid?
I know it takes basically nothing out of our finances, but it just seems like an odd thing to insist on protecting.
Only thing I can think of is that it supposedly makes us look bad internationally. Can't say that's the reason for sure but it wouldn't surprise me.louis89 said:Anyone?
Varion said:Only thing I can think of is that it supposedly makes us look bad internationally. Can't say that's the reason for sure but it wouldn't surprise me.
Everyone looking forward to the budget tomorrow? :lol
Deadman said:My friend said he had read rumours of tution fees going up to £7k. If that happens im more than slightly screwed :lol