War Peaceman
You're a big guy.
Many of the Tory rebels were themselves threatened by the boundary changes.
The crash happened under Labours watch even after they said it wouldn't, and the world economy is still fucked and nobody trusts anyone any more...I see Cameron is blaming the Eurozone and 'boom and bust' years (i.e. 'it's Labour's fault').
They can't really get away with that again, can they?
Liberal Democrats need to call for a general election here.
What's so wrong with Ed Balls that he makes the whole Labour Party unelectable? Apart from being a slimy twonk, that is (and there's a thousand worse than him in the Tories). Honestly, I think you two are overstating it.
Honestly again, I would've thought Harriet Harman was more of a liability.
So Brown called it wrong. Still not his or Labour's fault it actually happened. That's all on the US banks.
Still, I agree that there'll be no easy way out of this mess.
Not going to happen during the Olympics.
I can't imagine anything more embarrassing for our nation than having both the Eds in charge.
Labours got their leaders badly wrong, and most people I've spoke to feel the same.
David Cameron has said he will press ahead with proposed changes to the House of Commons despite the Lib Dems saying they will vote against them.
I really, really hope not.I predict the changes will be voted in
Cameron's calling their bluff.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19158924
I predict the changes will be voted in but it will acclerate the break up of the coalition.
Correct. I don't think many people understand just how sizable that number is. We're not quite talking Lords Reform rebellion numbers here, but it's still quite enough to see the Coalition's majority wiped out in the face of a unified Lib/Lab opposition.I don't think they'll go through. Labour oppose because they'll lose out. Lib Dems the same, and even though the Tories as a party would gain, there are a number of Tory MPs who would lose out under the scheme.
Cameron will just come out of it even weaker.
Anyway, anyone else mad that the Yanks are kicking our banks in the nads for allegedly laundering Iranian money?I'm torn on it. On the one hand, it's a bank, so fuck 'em; on the other hand, it's Americans forcing their laws on other countries again, and no sir, I don't like that, not one little bit
So, how does a person go into politics? Running for council, or local elections?
And there it is. "They're a bank, so fuck 'em" appears to be the correct response, as usual.Their NY office has to obey US law. End of.
Besides, they didn't do it to correct a perceived injustice. They did it because they were handed a truckload of cash and they have no qualms breaking the law in pursuit of profit.
Their NY office has to obey US law. End of.
Besides, they didn't do it to correct a perceived injustice. They did it because they were handed a truckload of cash and they have no qualms breaking the law in pursuit of profit.
BBC: Bank cuts growth forecast close to zero
So from 2% last year, to 0.8% in May, to 0% today. Plan A is working well.
BBC: Bank cuts growth forecast close to zero
So from 2% last year, to 0.8% in May, to 0% today. Plan A is working well.
What's ridiculous is that deficit hawks will cite this as a failure of Quantitative Easing and they'll call for more austerity cuts. Britain is being run into the ground by some woeful economics.
Yeah, you'd almost think the USA were deliberately trying to destroy the UK's financial sector, the way they're going after our banks. [/tinfoilhat]It is curious that they're mainlysticking it to UK banks though... are Bank of America and Citigroup etc being given the scrutiny that UK banks are?
Prime Minister David Cameron has announced the NHS Constitution is set to be changed to allow pharmaceutical companies access to anonymised GP records 'on a scale never seen before'.
The constitution currently guarantees patients the right to confidentiality and to expect the NHS to keep your confidential information safe and secure'.
But a consultation on the constitution due to start in October is set to overturn this right to allow patients' data to be automatically used for research unless the patient specifically chooses to opt out, the Mr Cameron revealed.
Pulse revealed in May that patients would be given the right to withhold identifiable data from being extracted from GP records, under proposed changes to a Government scheme to create a central NHS patient data service.
Someone tell me this is wrong... because I really can't get my head around it.
http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/newsart...llow-drug-companies-to-access-patient-records
And about that job market recovery...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19174431
Man, the UK is seemingly screwed for a very, very long time. Economic forecast is down, job market is slowing...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/government-computing-network/2012/aug/03/david-cameron-nhs-patient-dataCant find anything elsewhere about that Pharma data thing, but wouldnt surprise me.
Come on 3 million! We can do this, the work programme works!CHEEZMO™;40764109 said:Sounds like we're on the right path. Let's continue our current policies!
Oh and out comes Big Dave with some fucking stupid "more sports in schools so everyone can be an Olympic medalist" populist push that will actually fool all the cretinous "I'm so proud to be British now" facebook people into thinking he does listen and care. Fuck all that science and creativity, looks its sports on the telly that we're winning! I despair.
Didn't this government cut the school sports funds programmes? We had our budget cut drastically. Absolutely dyer.
Also approved the sale of 20 school fields (out of 21 applications). Apparently the schools will have access to other sports facilities. Probably something like a trip to a swimming pool on a coach once every 3 months.Didn't this government cut the school sports funds programmes? We had our budget cut drastically. Absolutely dyer.
I disagree with you there, I think people are on way too many "for life" treatments. We're very much in a "course of medication" rather than preventing the need for medication. Big pharma runs healthcare. It used to be about prevention more in the past I believe. Back when there were concepts like "a family doctor"There has been a transition from 'curative' medicine to 'preventative' medicine in recent years. Essentially they market a potential disease/affliction and basically guilt/persuade you into buying the drugs, playing on the 'better to be safe than sorry' mentality that a lot of people have.
And the government's friends are already making excuses for it. Lovely.The UK's trade gap widened sharply in June, to its worst level since comparable records began in 1997.
The deficit, which measures how much imported goods and services exceed exports, rose to £4.3bn in June from £2.7bn in May.
The rise was driven by a 4.6% month-on-month fall in the value of UK exports to eurozone and non-European Union countries.
The deficit with non-EU nations rose to £5.2bn in June from £3.9bn in May.
Economists and analysts greeted the figures with dismay.
BNP Paribas analyst David Tinsley said that even allowing for the reduced number of working days in June - because of the extra bank holiday from the Diamond Jubilee celebrations - the numbers were "very weak".
"There's clearly been a big impact from the low number of working days which has directly affecting shipments," said Mr Tinsley.
So, we now have a £4.3 billion trade deficit, a fifteen-year high, and most of the near-80% increase from May was from non-EU countries - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19194176
British workers are "among the worst idlers in the world", a group of Conservative MPs have claimed.
The authors include Elizabeth Truss and Dominic Raab, both tipped to be promoted in a future reshuffle.
"Too many people in Britain prefer a lie-in to hard work," they argue.
Unions described their comments as "ridiculous" and said the most serious challenge facing the economy was a "severe lack of jobs".
The UK, they argue, is being held back by an excessive public sector, substantial public sector pension liabilities and a welfare system which does not provide sufficient incentives to work.
"Once they enter the workplace, the British are among the worst idlers in the world," they write. "We work among the lowest hours, we retire early and our productivity is poor."
Under the EU Working Time Directive, most employees cannot be forced to work more than 48 hours although the UK has an opt-out enabling people to request to work longer if they choose.
The coalition government is currently planning to raise the retirement age for men and women to 67 by 2025, eight years earlier than previously planned.
In contrast, new French president Francois Hollande has said he wants to lower the retirement age from 62 to 60 for some workers.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19300051
motherfuckers. Coming from the people still on one of the longest vacation breaks a job can have.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19300051
motherfuckers. Coming from the people still on one of the longest vacation breaks a job can have.
e. I also resent the idea that citizens are just nodes in their networked economy. Like unless we satisfy the specific topic of debate we're idle and worthless and should be punished. Heaven forbid that people contribute in other ways to their families, communities and economies. There's no big picture to politics, which is why the healthcare and welfare reforms will fail. Our fascination with what can be measured, and what can be targeted has left us unable to see the root causes of problems in our society. The media just pumps out the statistics like there is some real thoughtful consideration going on in these people's heads. God knows what they'll do if they manage to get the deficit down. Maybe we can go back to the war on terrorism.
FUCKING TORIES AAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRGHHHGGHhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19300051
motherfuckers. Coming from the people still on one of the longest vacation breaks a job can have.
So much for fiscal conservatives, eh? That's what you get when you've got no growth. So, stagflation for the next five years at least?The UK government unexpectedly had to borrow money in July, traditionally a good month for tax receipts.
Borrowing to cover the gap between spending and revenue was £600m in July, the Office for National Statistics said. There was a surplus of £2.8bn in the same month a year earlier.
The Treasury blamed disappointing corporation tax receipts.
Labour said the government's efforts to try to cut the deficit had "choked off the recovery".
Analysts suggest the government could end up borrowing about £30bn more than last year, when official forecasts had suggested borrowing would fall this year.
The Office for Budget Responsibility, the official UK economic forecaster, said there was still "significant uncertainty" about the outlook for borrowing this year.
Four months into the financial year the government has borrowed £44.9bn, £9.3bn higher than the same period in 2011. That excludes banking interventions and the one-off boost in April from a transfer of Royal Mail pension assets to the public sector.
The OBR had predicted that borrowing on the same measure would be £120bn for the whole of the financial year, down from the £125bn borrowed last year.