Luci means light
Fer when used in conjunction with a word means "that which carries/brings"
So literally its translated as "That which carries/brings Light".
Its interesting to note that Luci is also feminine, since Lucius is the male gender of the name.
So literally translated from latin, Lucifer translates to "She who carries Light".
Tywin pulled it off better though.
It had the foreshadowing of a rock to the head considering they came right after each other.Anyone think the Bran and Baelish scenes imply something will happen between those 3? Baelish telling Sansa to be omniscient, and Bran actually being omniscient.
But imagine going through all those Aegon and Stoneheart chapters that you now know aren't relevant to the story at all. I lack the willpower.
Why does every single northerner now have giant chains on their armorSansa's new army
Petyr: "You can trust me. Everyone who can testify about how untrustworthy I am is ether dead or hundreds of miles away. Do...sneaky things, Sansa. To everyone. No one will ever know."
*world's largest telepath appears at the gate*
Petyr: "Shit."
Assuming the order of the scenes aren't that far separated, chronologically : Jon sailed to Dragonstone from Castle Black, faster than Arya can get to Winterfell from Hot Pie's inn?
Why does every single northerner now have giant chains on their armor
Did I miss something
Because I'm pondering a hypothetical?Why would you assume that?
A friend of mine told me yesterday he "liked the chess play" that is being played on scene in these first three episodes.
What? Fucking stupid checkers is all I'm seeing. I'm not even that disappointed in the outcome of the plan, but we're not even seeing the plan act out. Everybody is just teleporting from one place to another and yelling "well, I win" and that's how everything right now is playing out.
I get there are budget and time constraints, but they're not even tied to the books anymore, why invent battles and a war that you're not even going to show? Or why build up to a potential Dany vs Cersei clash at the end of last season and suddenly deflate the entire suspense right away, just so they can hurry to the war with the WW?
So was the whole Jaime / Cersei sex scene to show that Cersei basically got turned on by getting her revenge?
That's not what I'm talking about though, it's just this season. I'd find a screen but I'm lazy and on mobile.
Don't judge.
The dialog scenes in ep 3 were almost painfully stiff...Aside from the obvious problems, there have been some great scenes from D&D. Especially dialogue scenes. They really write Cersei in particular well, in my opinion -- in fact, better than GRRM does.
And the scenery, sets, costumes, and cinematography have jumped up several notches this season. Having the same seasonal budget but spread out over fewer episodes is definitely paying off.
That's not what I'm talking about though, it's just this season. I'd find a screen but I'm lazy and on mobile.
Remembering faces is hardI think it's to distinguish the northerners from the Boltons. The costume designers probably have
-Dress - Stark loyal northerners
-Dress - Bolton loyal northerners
and now
-Dress - Jon Snow northerners
The root "luci" comes from the genitive "lucis" of the word "lux" which is feminine, since things have genders in latin and the other romance languages. It has nothing to do with the one that carries the light though
Peléo;245028525 said:Knowing Aegon is just a distraction after reading the fifth book and watching the series was surely dissapointing. Same for most of the interesting plot lines from Drone.
But imagine going through all those Aegon and Stoneheart chapters that you now know aren't relevant to the story at all. I lack the willpower.
What isn't a distraction? If Jon doesn't kill the Night's King, will he be a distraction? Is Cercei a distraction if she doesn't take the throne?
But imagine going through all those Aegon and Stoneheart chapters that you now know aren't relevant to the story at all. I lack the willpower.
There is confirmation on the original three eyed raven's identity, and it is not future Bran. The original three eyed raven is Brynden Rivers, aka Bloodraven, a Targaryen bastard.
So because they aren't on the show they are "irrelevant" in the books? that's a very strange read.
How do you know this? It's very clear the show is telling its own story. And even some of the beats seem like they'll mirror the books to a degree. Tarly is almost certainly going to betray the Tyrells in the books too, but they'll do so by siding with Aegon.
The fact Aegon is not present, means he will 100% never make it to the Iron Throne by the end of the books, otherwise he would be in the show. It certainly undermines the importance of certain characters that seemed pretty relevant by the end of ADD, and assures you they're not key elements to the story.
The fact Aegon is not present, means he will 100% never make it to the Iron Throne by the end of the books, otherwise he would be in the show. It certainly undermines the importance of certain characters that seemed pretty relevant by the end of ADD, and assures you they're not key elements to the story.
Ye, torturing people gets her going, which along with the wildfire lovefest, is a direct parallel to the Mad King
The fact Aegon is not present, means he will 100% never make it to the Iron Throne by the end of the books, otherwise he would be in the show. It certainly undermines the importance of certain characters that seemed pretty relevant by the end of ADD, and assures you they're not key elements to the story.
(let's be real, GRRM won't wrap it up in two)
Aegon is the perfect foil to Dany. He has a better claim, is a man, and has Westerosi allies. She'll be a foreign invader with dragons and savages. Now that's a good conflict