lockii said:
I'm actually going to side with olimario on this one.
The article makes it sound as if the Cube is $299 and has no quality games at all. How is it obsolete on a competitive level?
"COMPETITION." Do you know what that means? It means that compared to the stunning numbers that PS2 consistently brings in, and compared to the growing momentum the Xbox has... the Gamecube simply no longer is seen as a viable challenger in this generation. It is
obsolete.
gamergirly said:
Yup sure did. You have to understand tho, telling the "whole" truth about Gamecube wont sell articles or get Nintendo haters to read them
The article is about it being obsolete when compared to Xbox and PS2 [and especially on a competitive level]. This is true. 250,000 consoles is frankly a laugh and a holler compared to the numbers PS2 consistently pulls worldwide. And not to mention how spectacular Sony is doing with its new PSTwo model, which again ends up making the Gamecube look like the one with egg on its face. Or just how fantastic the Xbox holiday bundles are doing. And these systems are 149, and the Gamecube still can't post competitive numbers!
Jr. said:
Ok well tell what HUGE new titles the PS2 still has comming out for it? Sure it has a million titles comming but with a good deal of them being things like "Monster Garage", and "your favorite anime show" inspired titles (which I do like) it snot like it has this HUGE powerhouse of gmaes lineup. The Cube has plenty of titles still comming, Mario 128??? It will be around for quite some time to come, don't worry Amir0x, you'll still have a reason to post!
Ah, Jr., ever the one with absolutely no grounding in reality.
The PS2 has
tons of huge new titles coming out. I'd list them, but I'd rather not get into a huge war of subjectivity wherein we're ripping on each others personal taste. The
fact is, it's indisputable that on a competitive level the Gamecube is essentially obsolete. It'll never be able to turn out numbers at the level PS2 does, and it will never be able to gain the momentum the Xbox now has. It is -dead- competitively. And everyone knows it.
As for the games, it's dwindling. This is also a fact. Just look at Manabyte's run down. 27 games for Cube... 93 for PS2. I think that's just a huge gap, doncha think?
The fact that you don't think PS2 or Xbox has "huge powerhouse lineups" is irrelevant. It's so irrelevant, in fact, that all it does is solidify your position as someone who does nothing but grasp at straws.
There's nothing wrong with liking the Cube most and thinking it has the best games. But if you're going to come around saying that it's not a competitive failure or that it's getting more support from third party companies or that it'll be receiving the majority of the AAA backup, then you're just going to look silly.
I'm a proud Gamecube owner, and I intend to suck every last drip out of my little handled console. I listed a fairly nice list of upcoming games we have to look forward to, and I can do that without giving a fuck that the Gamecube is a competitive failure. Why can't you, Jr.?
olimario said:
The average joe consumer, no matter how many times you click your heels and wish as hard as you can, will not become any more intelligent when it comes to purchasing products. They will hear a viewpoint and act on it regardless of the validity of that view.
You know that as well as I do and you know the power of the media to sway. Rob abused his status.
He was biased when he called the GameCube obsolete on a competetive level and intended for that comment to sway the general public away from the GameCube and to view it as worthless. An objective reporter would have followed that statement by listing a strength of the GameCube and stating what type of person might possibly want a GameCube over another system.
His job as a journalist of a holiday buyers guide is to give his view of what systems will give you the best value for your buck. He did just that. It's not his job to ease fragile Gamecube fanboy sentimentalities. Nor is it his job to even be completely unbiased (even though he wasn't biased at all). Nor is it his job to cater to stupid fucking people, and I'm not even clickin' my heels hoping consumers become smarter. If they don't, too fucking bad for those dumb little fuckers, ain't it chap?