Neutron Night said:
Ar: There's a problem. You describe "conciousness" as if it were comparable to matter and energy. It isn't. Everyting in the universe is matter and energy. "Conciousness" is an abstract concept invented by humans, like love or justice. Your conciousness consists of electrochemical reactions inside your brain. It is another form of matter and energy. Potentially in the future, we'll have the technology to read thoughts.
Friend, there is quite a mix of contradictory thoughts in your mind.
You claim that consciousness is a different form of matter and energy, and then the opposite, than it is not comparable to them, that everything is matter and energy alone and consciousness is an abstract concept.
Being a different form of matter and energy, means consciousness is as "real" or "abstract" as they are, and as a fundamental material of which the universe is constructed as they are.
Consciousness can be considered "abstract" as in non-physical-matter, but not as not-existant.
Aside the obvious interior proof, is easy to logically understand that consciousness is not more abstract than Time, Space, Light, or even Physical Matter.
Time or Space are definitely immaterial but Real: if they werent real, neither could be real the matter as we experience it, since it is radicated in them.
Consciousness isnt more abstract than matter: the error lies in distinguing them in "abstract and "not abstract" in base of a mere subjective perspective.
Subjective, because you are founding your distinction merely on the facility with which you are able to perceive each them - perceptions which are far from complete.
You perceive matter more than consciousness, you are concentrated more on matter, so you consider matter more real.
To a blind and deaf and tact-less man, matter may seem abstract, while consciousness the only reality, since is that HE can perceive better.
Fact is every man is blind to a lot of things. "Abstract" then becomes a subjective idea that only determines what your senses and understanding are most blind to, not a measurement of its existance.
To a "ghost", consciousness and energy would proably feel more tangible, while physical matter may be "abstract" to him. Same to a man who has slept for all his life.
To an ant, energy may be an "abstract" concept, since not understandable and measurable - to HIM.
Dont make the mistake to think that your own perceptions arent lacking in a number of unknown-to-you ways, like those of the ant, the sleeping man, the deaf, and so on.
If consciousness can be "produced" in a brain from matter, then it is, just like energy, just another "form" of matter.
Matter, energy, consciousness, would all be the same thing in different forms.
At times some of these forms are manifest at the same time; also, they can be manifest separately.
As it can manifest as Pure Matter, without manifesting (to human senses) the aspects of consciousness and energy; as Pure Energy, without manifesting the aspects of matter and consciousness;
then most likely also can similiarly be manifest as Pure Consciousness, without manifesting the aspects of matter and energy: a "spirit".
FOOD FOR THOUGHT:
We cant claim that matter is more real that consciousness, because we can experience matter only by means of consciousness.
If consciousness isnt real, then probably neither is real what consciousness experiences (matter).
There is no proof of existance of matter, other that which is given from consciousness, so the validity of existance of matter is subject to the validity of the existance of consciousness.
On the contrary, the idea of the existance of consciousness is not subject to the existance of matter, because consciousness gives testimoniance of itself to itself.
In extreme conjectures, matter may be an illusion, a "reading error" in the machine of consciosness, a dreamy perception. Matter may not exist, but consciousness surely does
Ultimately, from a quite common scientific-religious view, consciousness is the ONLY real thing there is.
Energy, Matter, Space, Time, are nothing more than "dream" ideas born out of the single consciousness defined as "God".
We can already change minds by using drugs. Does that change your "soul"?
Changes its manifested state, but not its nature.
You can compare Consciousness to water, and the mind to the shape of the bottle it fills, or maybe some pigments mixed in it.
Consciousness is a pure testimony. The things it gives testimoniance to, included the thoughts contained in a mind, are not the consciousness, but external objects.
The distincion is often hard to realize because consciousness thakes the shape of its container, in other words, being pure testimony, tends to identify with the objects it sees.
Which also explains why people who have a strong atraction towards material things, who think often of them, believe that matter, and not consciousness, is the greater Reality.
They are Consciousness, but mostly identified with Matter by (mis)use of consciousness own power of being testimony.
Again you're making a mistake. Magnetism, energy, etc., are purely physical concepts. Conciousness is an abstract concept.
No, you are wrong.
Magnetism, that you mentioned, makes an easy example.
Magnetism is no more "physical" than consciousness is, from a common human perspective (Ill ignore some subtler distinctions that can be made).
Magnetism can exist where physical matter is (mostly) not present, like in deep space.
How is it then more physical than consciousness, which you think can exist only if fused with physical matter (a brain)?
Magnetism can interact with Matter in some istances, and consciousness also can; magnetism can also exist without matter in others circumstances, on what basis you claim that consciousness cant do the same?
Lets do an (over)semplification:
Physical matter, by interacting with itself in accordance to specific laws, can form complex structures which eventually become what we call "planets" and "worlds".
+
Energy is matter in a different state, a different form of matter
+
Energy can exist without matter (in other words, "manifesting" in "pure" form)
=
Is extremely likely that some other kinds of energy (than the one "frozen" in matter) can also interact with each other and form ordinated structures, thus creating evolving "worlds", which are devoid of physical matter.
+
Consciousness is "distilled" from matter (according to the "unbeliever" doctrine, usually in the brain)
+
Again, matter and energy are basically the same
=
May be well possible to "distill" consciousness from pure energy as well
=
In those previously mentioned worlds made of pure energy, may exist conscious "life"forms.
=
Not really that different from what is called a Heaven, minus the superstitions about what is supposedly present in it (eternal joy, human food, or whatever).
=
Cant exclude that human consciousness is sometime recycled in such a structure.
In other words:
Is plausible and likely that exist structures and worlds made of forms of "matter" (energy) too subtle for our perceptions, but nonetheless ordinately functioning in accordance to natural laws, like everything we know in the universe.
Is also plausible that consciousness, being immaterial, can be contained in such worlds as well and maybe even better than it can within the physical structures we see here.
After all, consciousness has a greater affinity to subtle energy than gross matter; in the human body, various form of energy are the intermediary links between the consciousness and matter, like the nervous impulses to bring muscolar contraction.
A body of pure energy should be very fit for consciousness, and may posses "senses" able to perceive other structures of similiar pure energy.
We could theoretically create an android that had the same "conciousness" as a human being. Would he go to heaven or be reincarnated?
Not exactly.
You can "easily" create an artificial mind that imitates the behaviour of the human one, like you can build a stone statue that imitates the sembiances of the human body.
But a mere imitation of behaviour wouldnt make that construct of matter suddenly develop a consciousness, or ability to give testimoniance, any more than shaping a stone in form of a statue gives it consciousness.
It would be as conscious as a normal computer of today is, which is about as conscious as the matter of which it is made - pretty much as conscious as a stone, even if it can perform more complex tasks.
My car can also perform tasks, but that doesnt make it conscious, either.
DISCLAIMER AGAIN:
Much of this, is mere food for thought.
While I believe in the Soul, the details of my ideas are sometimes different from what I suggested here.
This is a first step, to help people take in consideration the existance of "astral" existence from a more logical point of view, without the blind beliefs of both who simply refuses believing anything outside the most (apparently) obvious things he can see, and who, similiarly blind, believes to religious doctrines without trying to understand them.
Superstition can be both religious and atheistic. People who "dont believe" often arent better than those who blindly believe to everything: they both refuse to refine their views to seek the truth.