MaddenNFL64
Member
Great game.
Well said. I always find myself nodding in agreement with your GTA/open-world posts, dreamfall =D
Nailed it, pretty much my views too.
....
Not even mentioning the MP.
Playing on the PC with mods is just on a different level.
That was pretty great. Integrity 2.0 was fairly disappointing by Lazlow's standards in past games, but the two hyper-political stations were funny I think.Who dug into the internet?
It's hit or miss for me but the depth is absurd.
The rival news reporting on various events is the best thing.
I think Euphoria makes the combat better than many other third-person shooters because there are actual hit reactions from enemies (which has gotten better and better in Red Dead and then Max Payne 3 respectively). The on-foot controls felt fine to me on release, but going back and playing it recently I'll say....yeah, they're not great. They feel sluggish and not precise. The cover system suffers also since Niko is slow getting in and out of it. I disagree with most complaints about IV, but the on-foot controls being lacking is one I can't argue with.I always blamed Euphoria for one of the reasons I didn't like GTA4. Play another 3rd person game, then go into GTA4 and you feel so sluggish on foot. The control seem to be effected by this Euphoria.
Because of this thread I launched GTA4 again to make sure that the controls was as annoying to me as I remembered. Looking for a car I would consider driving (sports car, I wonder if there's a better handling mod out). During this time I walked more than I ran, not because I wanted to take in the atmosphere but because I could turn sharper if I walked. I had more control when I walked because running + Euphoria (I guess) cause another force to be added to my control of the character. Wider turns, bumping into cars, maybe being bumped by them. And walking is so slow. The character has the agility of a elephant.
As far as the internet stuff goes, I hope they do less of it but of greater quality in V.That was pretty great. Integrity 2.0 was fairly disappointing by Lazlow's standards in past games, but the two hyper-political stations were funny I think.
Nice.I'm playing through it with a first person mod right now. Nothing immerses you in the city like roaming around it at eye level, seeing the pedestrians face to face, actually making out what some of the tiny writing says like the beer taps, etc.
Yeah, that's more what I mean. It had some funny material, but I guess I like his longer interviews more on some of his other shows.Integrity 2.0 was awesome, imo, but I thought it was too short. My only gripe about the talk radio in IV.
where do these dancing mods come from ? lolNailed it, pretty much my views too.
My mate got IV before and playing it at his house ( was playing SA before hand/ ps2 games still) I was in awe at the jump of graphics and things like animations. Went and got it as quick as I could and have since loved it.
Just cruising around the city in IV is one of the great things about it that is not possible in other games ( crappy physics that make cruising impossible, bad radios, I mean if you think IV has bad radios then I wonder what there views are on other games...)
Not even mentioning the MP.
Playing on the PC with mods is just on a different level.
Oh and![]()
where do these dancing mods come from ? lol
Who dug into the internet?
It's hit or miss for me but the depth is absurd.
The rival news reporting on various events is the best thing.
i spend a lot of time trying to find secret in it.
I found quite some hidden pages.
But i wonder if there is a collection of link with all of them.
The conspiracy theories and the fake us news were awesome.
Overrated IMO. On foot controls are horrible, clunky garbage, soundtrack was lacklustre at best, checkpointing was HIDEOUS, and as well realised as Liberty City is, theres not much to do in it. Expect go bowling and play darts, obv. And the story is c-tier straight to DVD quality crap. "Im trying to escape my life of crime and violence...by turning to a life of crime and violence, but in a different place". Bravo.
Oh god, another one of these where people shit on GTA IV and start upboating crap like Saints Row, Just Cause and Sleeping Dogs.
I've been sitting in class (finally got OUT!), just wondering how I'd respond to this.
For me, it is simple. Euphoria & the RAGE system has spoiled me, to the point where I can't go back to other open worlds. I love GTA IV; it has it's fair share of problems, but I like it's presentation and the real character is Liberty City. There are places in Broker that resemble Brooklyn in some uncanny ways- when I finally moved to NYC, I kept thinking on my digital memory from this game.
There's nothing that beats driving around in GTA, and listening to Candi Staton's "Young Hearts Run Free" in a drop top, before stopping by Playboy's rooftop to catch the sun rising. Little touches like that, really blow my mind. I'm a simple gamer- I can get lost for hours in the incredible detail they've designed the city with. I love the weight of everything- I know I can immediately go back to driving in this game, and it feels both challenging and rewarding. I love how NPCs react to gun fire in different places of their bodies, and how everything feels like it has momentum. I love the little touches of snarky humor and misanthropic radio commercials; and I love base jumping to catch an aerial perspective of Algonquin before landing in the ocean.
Many will count the game's narrative as a failure- I'm with the camp that enjoyed it, minus the decision making. I wanted more scripted execution animations, but I loved the diversity and cohesion of the characters. I wish GTA would stop stumbling into Italian Gang warfare, but it seemed appropriate. I loved, loved early missions running with Badman to get packages. Every character who interacted with Niko felt different- Florian's flamboyant and flippant attitude as an ex-gangster provided some relief in such a gritty backdrop. And the Episodes were pretty astounding- Ballad added so much creative weaponry, it remains my favorite iteration of GTA next to Vice City.
I think it's also the first impressions of the game that have stuck with me the most. I just remember being kind of awe-struck at the lighting, and how everything felt so vibrant. Shifting weight while taking cover, using manual targeting to pull off headshots in hectic firefights, etc. I loved every moment of it, and I still go back an play it at least an hour or two every couple of days; just to wander.
I think the city was so well crafted that even though I loved SR2 & 3, the cities felt so blah. There wasn't much visual flair, and everything was predicated on being more "EXTREEEEME" that it lost something. I don't even make that comparison much- just because Rockstar really refined the environment, so much more so than the bland design of Steelport or the awesome expanse of Just Cause 2.
So give me V. It'll be a swansong to close this generation for me, and a game I'll play for ages.
The Housers always have intrigued me like no other. And Benzies and Barrera always bring it!
What about the car collection for brucie? Assassination missions? shooting the birds? the friend missions you find randomly around the city? races through Brucie? taxi from Roman, delivery from Little jacob?
Fact is there was a lot of stuff to do, just many did not know how to access it ( through the phone or internet).
Did you not try MP?
Main character is an asshole.
What about the car collection for brucie? Assassination missions? shooting the birds? the friend missions you find randomly around the city? races through Brucie? taxi from Roman, delivery from Little jacob?
Fact is there was a lot of stuff to do, just many did not know how to access it ( through the phone or internet).
Did you not try MP?
Hahaha, "faux" backlash? Um, HELLO? Why can't people sincerely just dislike this vacuous excuse for a game? I won't even be as gracious as others who attribute their disappointment to it not living up to the GTA-lineage. Simply on its own merits, I think it sucks. Never finished after 3 attempts. Don't care what its technical feats were at the time, a game must first be fun. Everything else comes afterward.
GTA has never been that over-the-top. Not even close. Saints Row is goofy and like an adult swim version of gaming. GTA has always had a bit of a gritty feel to even the most goofy side stuff.
I just realized this is the only game this gen I triple dipped on. Finished the game on PS3, 360 and PC.
As dreamfall mentioned, some of the most emergent and memorable gaming experiences I've ever had. Driving at maniac speeds across the Algonquin Bridge at night in the rain, slick roads, wind blowing the rain hard, weaving in and out of traffic, bullets flying, explosions rocking cars in front and behind, all while Steve Mariotts 'Cocaine' is wailing away on the radio. Aside from my time with Portal 2, that's the highlight of this gen to me.
Meh. Not as good as San Andreas.
All those are basically just jobs, in return, you get money. And you need money for????
All those are basically just jobs, in return, you get money. And you need money for????
I just realized this is the only game this gen I triple dipped on. Finished the game on PS3, 360 and PC.
As dreamfall mentioned, some of the most emergent and memorable gaming experiences I've ever had. Driving at maniac speeds across the Algonquin Bridge at night in the rain, slick roads, wind blowing the rain hard, weaving in and out of traffic, bullets flying, explosions rocking cars in front and behind, all while Steve Mariotts 'Cocaine' is wailing away on the radio. Aside from my time with Portal 2, that's the highlight of this gen to me.
The difference between GTA IV and all those other open world game is that after you done the SP, side missions, jobs etc...
YOU CAN PLAY online, which is very well done in IV imo and tripped the life of the game.
From races, freeroam ,co op missions or cops and crooks, a lot of variety and fun.
While many people still play GTAIV online, I think a lot of people overlooked/dismissed it and is sort of under appreciated. I expect great things for GTAV in the realm of multiplayer, and I'm very interested to see how Rockstar's crew system is integrated and used.
GTA IV isn't bad, but it's no contest when its up to San Andreas.Meh. Not as good as San Andreas.
While many people still play GTAIV online, I think a lot of people overlooked/dismissed it and is sort of under appreciated. I expect great things for GTAV in the realm of multiplayer, and I'm very interested to see how Rockstar's crew system is integrated and used.