Hey guys, is Avengers at 2 billion worldwide yet?
Less than a billion to go!
Hey guys, is Avengers at 2 billion worldwide yet?
Hey guys, is Avengers at 2 billion worldwide yet?
I checked his imdb page and I had to go back all the way to 2003 and the first PotC movie. That's sad.
Less than a billion to go!
Finding Neverland was a fine movie.
I didn't see Imaginarium of Dr Parnissis, perhaps that was good?
Still, point made.
Imaginarium was a far better movie than Dark Shadows- I think IoDP was on par with the first PotC.Finding Neverland was a fine movie.
I didn't see Imaginarium of Dr Parnissis, perhaps that was good?
a bit off-topic, but box-office related nonetheless:
I know it's important to producers how much money a film makes, but shouldn't "success" be measured by attendance rather than money?
It is simply more objective, as it does away with "3d-tax", "IMAX-tax", and especially inflation. Immediately makes films comparable no matter when they came out.
Any thoughts?
a bit off-topic, but box-office related nonetheless:
I know it's important to producers how much money a film makes, but shouldn't "success" be measured by attendance rather than money?
It is simply more objective, as it does away with "3d-tax", "IMAX-tax", and especially inflation. Immediately makes films comparable no matter when they came out.
Any thoughts?
Only when you can go buy a house with attendance.
Only when you can go buy a house with attendance.
What is the general consensus on The Avenger's ultimate domestic take at this point?
Right now its pace has been pretty similar to TDK, and if it holds that pace it could end up in the high 600s.
What is the general consensus on The Avenger's ultimate domestic take at this point?
Right now its pace has been pretty similar to TDK, and if it holds that pace it could end up in the high 600s.
Week Week Totals Cume Total % Drop
1 270,000,000 270,000,000
2 148,500,000 418,500,000 -0.45
3 89,100,000 507,600,000 -0.40
4 53,460,000 561,060,000 -0.40
5 32,076,000 593,136,000 -0.40
Avengers would need to have the worst legs ever for a major superhero movie from this point forward not to beat The Dark Knight. Worse than Iron Man 2, Wolverine, X-men: The Last Stand, etc. Even green lantern legs beyond weekend 2 puts it on par with the Dark Knight. Green Lantern dropped 64% and 56% in its third and fourth weekend. Considering that movies almost never drop as hard in week 3 as they do in week 2, and that week 4 for the avengers is a holiday weekend (where a drop of 35% would be extremely high), the chance that Avengers does not pass TDK is next to 0.
Heh, Speedy you were the one telling people to calm down when you were on the verge of having a meltdown ..
And guys did you know the revised estimate for Dark Shadows is up 1M - Depp redeemed!1
Ducky (duckroll) stepped in and stopped you but whatever, keep imagining things.I was having a meltdown? pretty sure I wasn't.
If memory serves, you were the getting pretty steamed/hot under the collar.
Depp is no longer a boxoffice draw.
Ducky (duckroll) stepped in and stopped you but whatever, keep imagining things.
Indeed;lol. Posts are there for all to see, I'm sure they can make their minds up as to who was really on the verge of losing their cool.
:lolUsually telling other people to calm down and suggesting other people are about to meltdown when there are no signs of any such things happening is a sign that the person saying that is on edge. Just saying.Read it again.Somehow, reading the thread I get the feeling that everyone is calm and normal, and you're the one who's one step away from melting down. Maybe you should take your own advice?
What about my posts even implies a meltdown?
I also expect that it will get a best from the Avengers, but its hard to say what that even means.What kind of bump do you expect Amazing Spiderman to get, given the success of the Avengers? Personally I expect it to overperform.
or do you anticipate Superhero Fatigue setting in instead? (I think its too early for superhero fatigue)
Maybe people will think Spider-Man will get eventually tied into the Avengers franchise and so it'll get a boost from that?
What kind of bump do you expect Amazing Spiderman to get, given the success of the Avengers? Personally I expect it to overperform.
or do you anticipate Superhero Fatigue setting in instead? (I think its too early for superhero fatigue)
To speak personally, I loved the Avengers to such an extent that it has gotten me more excited about super heroes in general. Having seen the trailer paired with the Avengers twice, I am now much more excited about ASM.Maybe people will think Spider-Man will get eventually tied into the Avengers franchise and so it'll get a boost from that?
Indeed;
:lol
It was understandable why you were on the edge - you predicted Avengers wouldnt even break 250M domestic.
Gee, boxofficemojo and the rest were all comparing Avenger's tracking to SM3.
THEY MUST BE POINTLESS!!!1
*facepalm*
I'm done wasting my time with you here.
Terrible terrible terrible midnight numbers, I dont think Avengers will gross 250M domestic.
Referring to this part of my post;
Really? You cant even get obvious sarcasm.
My only mistake was trying to reason with you.
Leave him alone, I guess he'll dudebroski and act cool when really he was the one close to having a meltdown here.
There are only two things I see going against Spider-man. That is one, and this other is the simple challenge in re-launching a franchise. There is no guarantee that it will be able to pick up where the last one left off in terms of audience interest, though that can be seen as both a positive and a negative.(-) Spider-man 3 sucked. This will turn off some adult fans (see Pirates 4 and Mission Impossible 3 domestically)
a bit off-topic, but box-office related nonetheless:
I know it's important to producers how much money a film makes, but shouldn't "success" be measured by attendance rather than money?
It is simply more objective, as it does away with "3d-tax", "IMAX-tax", and especially inflation. Immediately makes films comparable no matter when they came out.
Any thoughts?
There are only two things I see going against Spider-man. That is one, and this other is the simple challenge in re-launching a franchise. There is no guarantee that it will be able to pick up where the last one left off in terms of audience interest, though that can be seen as both a positive and a negative.
I see it as mostly a positive, the last one was pretty widely recognized as terrible and we needed a new face for Spiderman, a new direction. The brand wasn't hurt by the last movie, just the people involved in that movie. I expect it to do better than SM 2 for sure.
Theater attendance has been trending downwards for years. If studios reported ticket sales, they wouldn't be able to break the records they set in the 70s and 80s. Most other sectors of the entertainment industry go by unit sales (books, music, video games), but reporting gross gives the impression of continued growth, which is better for investors and creates hype.
I see it as mostly a positive, the last one was pretty widely recognized as terrible and we needed a new face for Spiderman, a new direction. The brand wasn't hurt by the last movie, just the people involved in that movie. I expect it to do better than SM 2 for sure.
I would think that at the end of the day, the movie industry is a business and what matters is how much the movie brings in. Attendance may be down, but movies are making a lot of money at the box office these days. Granted, it's like the game industry where many bomb and the blockbusters hold them up. But I don't see any benefit to producers and studios measuring "success" by attendance unless it translates to more money.
This. As much as we may want it to be, the box office is not a sporting event. The only statistics that really matter to those who need them is the money.
Movies are a lot more expensive to go see now though. My parents didn't have a ton of money as children, but they have told me stories of going to the theatre almost every weekend as children. Matinee tickets were 25-50 cents. Popcorn was 10 cents. Adjusting for inflation, 50 cents is ~$3.50. The cheapest I can see a movie in my city for is $5.25 on Tuesdays (with a Cineplex Odeon Scene card. Without it, the movie is $7.25). If I want to go to a 3D movie, the cheapest price is $8.25. Popcorn is like $4.50 for a small.
I am only 30, and even I can remember $4.50 being regular ticket price and $2.25 being matinee price. $4.50 in 1992-1993 would be around $6.75 now. Not $10-13.
Makes sense that more people went to the movies back when everyone could afford to. Taking your wife and two children to the movies now can cost up to $80 if everyone wants popcorn and a drink. Tickets alone are $35. Even more for 3D or IMAX. Much cheaper to just wait 4 months and rend the movie in HD for $6.
Worldwide or Domestically? Because I think that ASM will have an really tough time hitting $370M domestically. In fact, I wouldn't say it is a lock for $300M yet. On the other hand, 3D plus Spidey's popularity overseas makes beating Spider-man 2 worldwide a much easier task.
Spider-Man 2 made $783M WW. If ASM simply matched Spider-man 3's international cume of $554M, it would have to make about $230M domestically to tie Spider-Man 2 worldwide. Shrek 4 was the largest in the series internationally, so this is not that unlikely.
I didn't say that there wasn't a good reason for theater attendance to be down, I simply stated that it is. Novels and records also used to be cheaper, but they still report unit sales.
WW and OW.
This doesn't make any sense. Audiences drive the entertainment industry. It's not like cars where you can make extremely high end products that a small number of people will pay a lot of money for. If Hollywood films don't play to a large audience, the industry is in trouble. Last I checked, theater attendance was going down while ticket prices were going up. There is mostly likely an inflection point coming. Looking at theater attendance is the only way to predict that.
I didn't say that there wasn't a good reason for theater attendance to be down, I simply stated that it is. Some novels used to sell for a dime, but the publishing industry still reports unit sales.
I am seriously worried that Prometheus won't do well at the box office. I think that the rating might I hurt it. I think that the title of the film works against it. It doesn't appeal to a wide demographic, etc.
I am seriously worried that Prometheus won't do well at the box office. I think that the rating might I hurt it. I think that the title of the film works against it. It doesn't appeal to a wide demographic, etc.
I am seriously worried that Prometheus won't do well at the box office. I think that the rating might I hurt it. I think that the title of the film works against it. It doesn't appeal to a wide demographic, etc.
This thread is only at six pages on its 6th page... Me posting= more pages. Confirmed.
This thread is only at six pages on its 6th page...
Don't really care myself. The film has been made. Nothing else matters. And I have no financial stake in it.
So if it does good numbers, well done. If it doesn't, I won't lose sleep over it. And it will probably mean we'll get a faster bluray release for it.
Your posts are only posts that you made that I don't understand. You posting = more confusion. Confirmed.This thread is only at six pages on its 6th page... Me posting= more pages. Confirmed.
Novels and records are products that you buy and own. they are the equivalent of the home video market which does report in units. Theatrical movies are more similar to concerts or plays which often do report earnings over ticket sales (though some do both).
I didn't word my post very well. The studios know what they need to know under the current reporting process. Releasing detailed attendance numbers rather than money doesn't benefit them in any way.