GoldenEye 007
Member
NSFW, but the Post is printing nude pics of Melania from 1996:
https://twitter.com/nypost/status/759548757662990338
Maybe this will finally get the GOP to embrace nudity. They've thrown out all of their other principles so far.
NSFW, but the Post is printing nude pics of Melania from 1996:
https://twitter.com/nypost/status/759548757662990338
HILLARY + 50 PLEAAAASE
538 Adjusted Leader Trump +1
Dude, that is going to play AMAZINGLY well with Pittsburghers.
Edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6hpgrwGIww So damn 'burgh.
NSFW, but the Post is printing nude pics of Melania from 1996:
https://twitter.com/nypost/status/759548757662990338
The Donald will slip up one week and call Hillary a b****, say all Hispanics are wetbacks and say the n word in some leaked audio that goes viral.
Honestly, if it really happens I will be in legitimate shock. Won't surprise me if getting under his skin while debating is part of her plan.My dream is still that Clinton gets under her skin during the first debate and he snaps and calls her a bitch on live TV with 40 million people watching.
(((Harry Enten))) ‏@ForecasterEnten 2h2 hours ago
Me thinks Clinton is going to get a pretty good bounce...
Eh, I'm not cool with this.
1) I don't have a problem with people doing whatever they want with their body.
2) She's the spouse, not the candidate.
It won't be. If Trump could get away with accusing a federal judge of being unfit to do his job merely because of his heritage (and then successful double down and TRIPLE down on that), and still have a viable candidacy...this won't do it.
We as a country need to get used to it. We need to stop trying to explain away the fact that a large portion of our country does not mind that the Republican nominee for the presidency is willing to throw all sense of morality, respect and decency out the window if the recipient of that ire is a brown person or a woman. And heaven help you if you're a brown woman.
What state was it last election that they started calling for Obama that had Karl Rove in full denial mode arguing with the hosts at Fox, Ohio or Pennsylvania?
What state was it last election that they started calling for Obama that had Karl Rove in full denial mode arguing with the hosts at Fox, Ohio or Pennsylvania?
What was the previous PPP poll?
What state was it last election that they started calling for Obama that had Karl Rove in full denial mode arguing with the hosts at Fox, Ohio or Pennsylvania?
It will be just generalized bullshit rehashed from the primaries for TrumpI mean, the beautiful thing is, how in the world is he going to actually debate her? I mean, this isn't Twitter. They will ask follow up questions. I think his goal will be to bate Hillary into saying something shitty or screechy or "emotional."
The thing is, she's dealt with idiots like him for her entire life. The Benghazi Committee was a 12 hours of grilling, and she didn't break. Donald Trump's small hands and small mind won't break her.
Also, the subtle ways in which we goaded him during the Convention were BRILLIANT. Because if he says "Believe me" on stage during the debate, all Hillary has to do is turn to him and say "But, Donald. We don't believe you. Explain, specifically what you're going to do?" He uses "believe me" like a verbal crutch and it's hard to stop it. He will do it. It's only a matter of time.
And can you see Donald in a town hall? Hahahahaha
Did you find J.D Salinger Adam?Hollywoo Stars and Pundants: What Do They Know? Do They Know Things?? Let's Find Out!
What state was it last election that they started calling for Obama that had Karl Rove in full denial mode arguing with the hosts at Fox, Ohio or Pennsylvania?
It won't be. If Trump could get away with accusing a federal judge of being unfit to do his job merely because of his heritage (and then successful double down and TRIPLE down on that), and still have a viable candidacy...this won't do it.
That is a really weird thing coming from a Murdoch paper. There had to be a story behind it.
And yeah, this is incredibly low class.
http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/most-say-presidential-debates-influence-their-vote/Two-thirds (67%) of those who voted in the 2008 election said the debates between Barack Obama and John McCain were very or somewhat helpful in deciding which candidate to vote for, according to the Pew Research Centers quadrennial post-election survey. (About three-in-ten (28%) said they were very helpful and 39% said they were somewhat helpful.)
Did you find J.D Salinger Adam?
Two drunk girls is more of a terrorist organization than Isis.
It will be just generalized bullshit rehashed from the primaries for Trump
Trump: "Look, the economy is a disaster, ok. Millions of people dont have good jobs and millions of people wanna get out of here because we are so bad. We dont have good jobs. We. dont. have. good. jobs. Listen, when I'm president I'm bringing jobs back and believe me, we're gonna have lots of jobs. There's gonna be so many new jobs your heads gonna spin."
A retort about his shit made in china from Clinton
Trump: "The economy is rigged, ok? the economy is rigged. It is just ridiculous how cheap it is to make things in China. The trade deal, it's a disaster. Bernie doesn't like it and I already said it, the TPP is a disaster. The NAFTA is disaster. We have to fix so many things here and I know how to fix things. I know how to make deals. When I make a deal, it's a good deal. Believe me."
A retort about how Bill Clinton created 23 million jobs in a globalized economy while passing NAFTA.
Trump: "He created some jobs but it didn't work out ok. Our cities are warzones. Look at Michigan, Cleveland. I saw this with my eyes, people don't have jobs anymore. NAFTA is a disaster for our country. So many jobs gone. I will solve the problem, ok? I know how to fix the problems. I am the best problem solver, and I tell ya these trade deals gotta go"
It will be 60 minutes of this.
It will be just generalized bullshit rehashed from the primaries for Trump
Trump: "Look, the economy is a disaster, ok. Millions of people dont have good jobs and millions of people wanna get out of here because we are so bad. We dont have good jobs. We. dont. have. good. jobs. Listen, when I'm president I'm bringing jobs back and believe me, we're gonna have lots of jobs. There's gonna be so many new jobs your heads gonna spin."
A retort about his shit made in china from Clinton
Trump: "The economy is rigged, ok? the economy is rigged. It is just ridiculous how cheap it is to make things in China. The trade deal, it's a disaster. Bernie doesn't like it and I already said it, the TPP is a disaster. The NAFTA is disaster. We have to fix so many things here and I know how to fix things. I know how to make deals. When I make a deal, it's a good deal. Believe me."
A retort about how Bill Clinton created 23 million jobs in a globalized economy while passing NAFTA.
Trump: "He created some jobs but it didn't work out ok. Our cities are warzones. Look at Michigan, Cleveland. I saw this with my eyes, people don't have jobs anymore. NAFTA is a disaster for our country. So many jobs gone. I will solve the problem, ok? I know how to fix the problems. I am the best problem solver, and I tell ya these trade deals gotta go"
It will be 60 minutes of this.
Also, I think that the debate thing is another case of Trump misjudging his ground.
In the primaries, him not showing up for a debate got him almost as much attention as showing up, and the media markets caved to him for the ratings.
This is the general. People will tune in with or without Donald Trump. If he skips the debates they'll hold them without him and it'll just be a 3-hour infomercial for HRC.
Trump is not great at recognizing when he doesn't have leverage.
That's so craven. Serious news outlets can't report on this anyway.One conspiracy theory circling Twitter is that Trump leaked these photos to change the media narrative.
That's so craven. Serious news outlets can't report on this anyway.
Hillary is a monster when it comes to details and policy. What I think we are sadly again veering into is alarmingly low expectation for Trump. As long as he joins words together in english and constructs sentences, he will be given a passing mark. It's the expectation of going against a juggernaut like Clinton. Similar to the Palin v Biden debate. Biden crushed her, but she got passing mark and lived to survive the rest of the campaign. A corollary from this would be then, is that Biden's crushing of a weakling is what may have led the country to chose Obama over McCain eventually.This is all true!
The thing is, Hillary needs to hit him every time he does some glistening generality. Like, if he says "Believe me, I'm going to bring back 24 million jobs in six weeks. Believe me." Just hit him "How? What, specifically, are you going to do, Donald?" If the moderators won't follow up (which I think they will because, seriously, someone wants to get him on something), then Hillary needs to.
There's little risk for her because she knows goddamn everything. Seriously. Random statistics about unexploded land minds in Laos. She knew the correct answer off the cuff! Just let him keep getting into word salad. Try and get a Reagan type "There you go again, Donald."
Debates is where she shines. Big speeches eh not so much maybe. But, seriously, just let Hillary be Hillary in a debate. Trump will MAYBE do one.
Also, I think that the debate thing is another case of Trump misjudging his ground.
In the primaries, him not showing up for a debate got him almost as much attention as showing up, and the media markets caved to him for the ratings.
This is the general. People will tune in with or without Donald Trump. If he skips the debates they'll hold them without him and it'll just be a 3-hour infomercial for HRC.
Trump is not great at recognizing when he doesn't have leverage.
It would make some sense given it's hard to believe NYPost isn't working with him. Hopefully the media isn't stupid enough to fall for it but we know how much they love carrying his water.
This Khan thing has to be the biggest backlash to anything Trump has ever said, at least from my browsing of various forums and social media.
This is all true!
The thing is, Hillary needs to hit him every time he does some glistening generality or random bullshit. Like, if he says "Believe me, I'm going to bring back 24 million jobs in six weeks. Believe me." Just hit him "How? What, specifically, are you going to do, Donald?" If the moderators won't follow up (which I think they will because, seriously, someone wants to get him on something), then Hillary needs to.
There's little risk for her because she knows goddamn everything. Seriously. Random statistics about unexploded land minds in Laos. She knew the correct answer off the cuff! Just let him keep getting into word salad. Try and get a Reagan type "There you go again, Donald."
Debates is where she shines. Big speeches eh not so much maybe. But, seriously, just let Hillary be Hillary in a debate. Trump will MAYBE do one.
Also!
She needs to hit him with specifics. If Trump says "Crime is way up!" she needs to hit him with the exact numbers. "This is not true, Donald." If he says illegal immigration is up, hit him with the numbers "Again, Donald, this is not true."
Every time he says something, you have to chip away with facts. It fits her persona. She's the wonky person who sweats the details.
Hillary is a monster when it comes to details and policy. What I think we are sadly again veering into is alarmingly low expectation for Trump. As long as he joins words together in english and constructs sentences, he will be given a passing mark. It's the expectation of going against a juggernaut like Clinton. Similar to the Palin v Biden debate. Biden crushed her, but she got passing mark and lived to survive the rest of the campaign. A corollary from this would be then, is that Biden's crushing of a weakling is what may have led the country to chose Obama over McCain eventually.
It would make some sense given it's hard to believe NYPost isn't working with him. Hopefully the media isn't stupid enough to fall for it but we know how much they love carrying his water.