Hopefully no one has already posted this.
Seattle Plunder
It's a Nation article about the Seattle Plunder with a tinge of labor rights thrown in.
I saw that. It reeks of naiveté.
It's no secret that pro sports (especially in America) are a cold-blooded business, and that teams are not public trusts or pillars of the community like soccer clubs in Europe. Owners are necessarily mega-millionaires (if not billionaires), so why should we expect them to behave like pillars of virtue? You don't get that kind of money by worrying about "ethics" or "doing the right thing." You get it primarily by being a greedy fuck, leveraging every opportunity, and looking out for your own.
The #1 factor that led to the Sonics move was Schultz's willingness to sell the team for a quick buck once he realized that this whole NBA thing is harder than he thought it would be. Bennett and the other owners smelled a ripe opportunity and pounced. If you think Schultz expected an ownership group based out of OKC to keep the team in Seattle, I've got some ocean-front property in OKC to sell you.
I get where he the author is coming from, but he's completely ignoring a huge aspect of ownership of a pro sports team: how good the owner actually is at it. Does anyone actually think the Sonics would be anywhere near as good as the Thunder are now if Schultz had kept the team? Would NBA fans be enjoying this incredible core of young talent if Bennett hadn't come in and hired Presti? At the very least, they almost certainly wouldn't have Westbrook and Ibaka.
Hate Bennett for his business ethics all you want, but he's a damn good owner.
Grimm Fandango said:
Wasn't there a way to watch Sonicsgate on the internet (not pirated)? Can't seem to find it now and I've been meaning to watch it.
edit: nvm found it on YouTube.
It's a great documentary, and I think it's extremely fair. Every Thunder fan should watch it.