you won't see any headphone more frequently in the professional world.
Nah, I trust SGS on the matter. He told me he had a C model and tone sweeps showed a rise of 20 DB boost to the low end. It's been corroborated with a few other people over at HF whom I trust. In fact there's a thread over at HF where the guy who engineered the phones posted and he confirms that the C model is hi-fi subjected to severe bass boost To appeal to the bass loving demographic. I got word from James444 that the new Sony H3 hybrid is the same way. It's a true TOTL performer that's been boosted to hell in the low range. You mod the phones and EQ the bass down and It's supoosed to be excellent. Eye level with the best he's heard
So they're the Fostex of the IEM world, interesting!
What are the current $100 IEM recommendations?
Thanks. We'll give both of them a try tomorrow but seems that the Bose's cans are worth the premium.The Bose's are purportedly the best, sporting the best comfort and highest level of active noise cancellation. I don't own either of them though, as active noise-cancelling isn't my thing.
I recently got the ATH-M50. Really like them so far. They sound really balanced in sound, not as much bass as I wanted though.
Then again, I don't really have another pair of headphones to compare them too. Just wish I would've read more opinions on them before pulling the trigger. Whatever though, I'm liking them so far.
Also finding them a lot more comfortable than the last pair of Beats I had.
It's idiots like him who ruin everything.
"A few hundred dollars"!!?? For premium housing, cables and a case.
People with no sense for price value. They will pay whatever they feel, without any regard to the true cost. People like him are the reason why we are price gauged to fucking hell.
Awww ffff......
/end pissed rant
But that's the point... it's like a proof of possibility.Uh, by that account, just about everyone here who's owned a phone that costs more than a few hundred is an "idiot". In the IEM world, something like the Sony MH1 is an anomaly. It's practically a unicorn where price/performance is considered, cause I can't think of a single other $20 phone that has anywhere close to the type of performance he's referencing. (keep in mind that the ER-4 has been around for 2 decades and still sells at around $300!)
SGS was sayin that were the MH1 priced at a few hundred bucks and featured a competent build quality, it'd holistically, slot in nicely in the current IEM landscape and still would be considered a bargain. He's not wrong about that, since we've all been paying out the nose for incremental increases in performances for forever now.
Even when you consider insanely priced TOTL IEMs like the K3003 and the 1Plus2, their performance is definitely comparable to full sized (similarly insanely priced) flagship cans like the HD800 or the TH900, except you can drive them to 90 percent of their potential from a mere iPhone instead of further spending an additional several hundred/thousand on a DAC/amp rig to drive a HD800/TH900.
Again, that makes the MH1 an anomaly, not even like a Fostex since an unmodded T50-RP is still $150. $20 for the MH1 is like cheaper than dinner at Red Lobster lol
But that's the point... it's like a proof of possibility.
Everyone is pricing their phones aligned the performance/price point of the other phones, the regular race for good price points is completely off in the higher end. And sometimes, there are even quality issues.
The paint of the demo HD800 in a local store is FLAKING. You can see the regular plastic below, complete with seams and all. And this thing is 1200. For this money, I would expect a build that lasts 2 decades.
I have on my desk a cheap sub 100 Euro 2.1 setup. It sounds amazing. It destroys any regular price/performance point. It drives home the point what SHOULD be possible for 1k, if audio were a regular competitive market. Instead, we mostly have crap mass consumer ware and severly overpriced good stuff, for the most part.
I remember when the HD360 was 170 Euro new. Noone was buying headphones it seemed. 3 years later the headphone-hype was on and a new 360 shot up to 370 Euro. Boy, those magnets sure have exploded in price. And noone is complaining, everybody seems to say "it's worth it". Especially for the manufacturers.
Why the hell is the MH1 $99 in australia?
Anyone who's ordered a pair, do get a parametric equalizer (I use "equalizer" on the app store, it's got excellent, transparent processing abilities and the UI is almost as good as Apple's stock music player) and EQ the bass down using these settings: 75 hz. -4 DB, Q= .75. It'll result in a phone that's amazingly well balanced and detailed without spiking the treble at 5-10 hz. like so many manufacturers are so fond of. If you're used to "colored" phones with amped up treble, boosted bass or scooped mids, it'll likely take a while to acclimate to a flatter FR, but you'll then find it hard to go back since those other phones will sound downright unnatural. (I do keep around bass heavier sets for fun, but the MH1 is a true all arounder) Make sure your stuff is like 320 Kbps or so and you're good to go!
On the head-fi thread about these headphones (the engineering thread, not the review thread) the headphone designer suggests blocking the rear vent, and shows this drops the bass by around 4db - worth trying that first before playing with software EQ?
http://www.head-fi.org/t/634193/sony-mh1-r-d-story-and-discussion See the update from 7th November 2012.
I agree about the MH1's treble. Considering how much treble definition that's there, I find it hard to be bothered by how smooth it is. I do have a preference for a brighter sound, but even then, I like the tonal balance of this already.I’d also give the highs to the K3003 due to its awesome timbre. Cymbals actually sound like brass on the K3003 and strings have got that waxy quality and bite up top. The MH1 does have sufficient air up top but the treble isn’t biting. And the treble, while extended and detailed, does ultimately lack crispness and feels a tad delicate and feathery light. In any case, I find it hard to fault at all when the necessary detail is there, and hey, $20!
The MH1 makes me regret getting the Philips Fidelio S2 that I blindly bought here. The S2s are enjoyable, but it suffers from the left-right-in-your-head sound imaging. These MH1, however, don't. Wow. I have zero complaints about the MH1's soundstage so far, whereas, the S2 lacks depth to really appreciate some of its imaging. Lots of width, but at times, the detail feels like it's stuck at the back of your ears/head trying to perceive them. I also like the decay. It feels faster than the CALs (my only reference point).The soundstage on the MH1 is surprising in how generous and spacious it is, and while possessing impressive depth, ultimately misses the mark made by the best of the best. While not quite as holographic and spacious as phones such as the Flat-4/K3003/334/1Plus2, it escapes that small, “in your head” feeling of lesser IEMs, and I don’t ever get the feeling that it sounds flat and congested. The imaging is quite good as well and it’s capable of throwing cues with good accuracy. Sounds seem to originate in distinct locations in all directions and not just linearly from right to left. Again, this sort of thing ought to be illegal for $20.
Try seeing if this is the reason first by process of elimination? Mine sound perfectly fine.So the MH1 sounds fine when I hold down the Call button but otherwise it purposely drowns out the audio? Do I need to get an App or is this some problem with Google Music?
Running Android 4.4
Try seeing if this is the reason first by process of elimination? Mine sound perfectly fine.
My initial impressions on the Sony MH1: I might order a few more...
Edit: My first complaint already. If you need to use the larger eartips for a better seal, I pray yours aren't bent like mine. I'll probably have to buy some new eartips now. The medium sized ones are alright, but any movement I make dislodges them from forming a proper seal. It sucks.
Edit2: Don't want to doublepost so I'll continue here.
Thanks to HiResDes, Dynamite Ringo Matsuri, and this thread for bringing this to my attention.
I agree about the MH1's treble. Considering how much treble definition that's there, I find it hard to be bothered by how smooth it is. I do have a preference for a brighter sound, but even then, I like the tonal balance of this already.
The MH1 makes me regret getting the Philips Fidelio S2 that I blindly bought here. The S2s are enjoyable, but it suffers from the left-right-in-your-head sound imaging. These MH1, however, don't. Wow. I have zero complaints about the MH1's soundstage so far, whereas, the S2 lacks depth to really appreciate some of its imaging. Lots of width, but at times, the detail feels like it's stuck at the back of your ears/head trying to perceive them. I also like the decay. It feels faster than the CALs (my only reference point).
Definitely a bum pair. There should be NO interaction with the remote circuitry whatsoever unless you're running an Ericsson phone. It doesn't do a thing when I press the buttons with the phones plugged into my iPhone for instance. I think the QC of these phones must be spotty cause some people were getting pairs with hilariously boosted bass. Hell, when I got my own pair, I thought they must've been mismanufactured cause the cable was incomprehensible bad. Like I could not understand how someone could tune a driver to be so fuckin good and then put it into the worst god damned package ever.Nah it happens on my laptop and desktop too.
Must have gotten a bad pair.
I guess I will try taking it apart over the weekend. What a bummer
Definitely a bum pair. There should be NO interaction with the remote circuitry whatsoever unless you're running an Ericsson phone. It doesn't do a thing when I press the buttons with the phones plugged into my iPhone for instance. I think the QC of these phones must be spotty cause some people were getting pairs with hilariously boosted bass. Hell, when I got my own pair, I thought they must've been mismanufactured cause the cable was incomprehensible bad. Like I could not understand how someone could tune a driver to be so fuckin good and then put it into the worst god damned package ever.
Over at Rin Choi's blog, are ways to mod the phones even further (if you've got the tools and hands for it I suppose); the microdriver is crazy good for what it is
Are the MH1-WO the same as the MH1's just white colored?
Im going to try to get the remote bit open and see if I cant just bypass it altogether. Hopefully I can still preserve the remote physically as it will probably be better at strain relief than heatshrink on these cables
I'm honestly not sure about that one. Best to get the one that's linked in the thread to avoid getting the wrong one, as these thing don't have the best QC it seems
Why not just claim they're a faulty pair and return thru Amazon?
I'm honestly not sure about that one. Best to get the one that's linked in the thread to avoid getting the wrong one, as these thing don't have the best QC it seems
Why not just claim they're a faulty pair and return thru Amazon?
Nah it happens on my laptop and desktop too.
Must have gotten a bad pair.
I guess I will try taking it apart over the weekend. What a bummer
Strictly speaking of expensive earphones, I've owned the Etymotic MC5 (until they broke and I won't ever recommend them because of how they did) and the Philips Fidelio S2 now; yet, I adore the MH1s more than the S2 already. The MH1 doesn't exhibit the same imaging issues I have with the S2 or headphones in general - that in-your-head headstage where you know know what's coming from the left or right. It's the sort of immersive soundstage I've grown accustomed to in more expensive setups (speakers or headphones), and the compromises I have to make to get that is negligible coming from the S2. Sure, it would be nice to have more resolution, but the MH1s are proving to be not so revealing phones yet having enough to appreciate quality mixing. I'm crazy enough to own more than 1 pair of these now. I might considering a 3rd because of how cheap and inexpensive they are. To exaggerate, it's like being able to own $200 earphones for $20. Why not at that price?Isn't it nuts? If you had more expensive phones available it'd blow your mind as to just how capable the MH1 is. It's got no egregious flaws that I can detect. The treble could be more defined/have better timbre, the resolution isn't the best (but it's FAR from bad), it doesn't have the most pinpoint accuracy nor the widest dynamic breadth... but MORE importantly, it excels from a tonal perspective and is far above average in all areas. They're balanced without coming across as clinical; music just shines thru them. Again, nuts for $20. The more time you spend with them, the more you'll realize how much of a steal they are; they're just versatile across all genres and if it weren't for the awful cable, I'd wholeheartedly recommend them to anyone
They should be. I opted for black because I like the color more. Global Mobiles was selling the black and white ones earlier. The black version went OOS earlier in the afternoon.Are the MH1-WO the same as the MH1's just white colored?
MH1 or MH1C?
The mic and gnd pins are in different locations. If it's perfectly clear when mic and gnd are connected, then it may be this. Try pulling the headphone jack out slightly, so that the gnd pin in the jack contacts the other ring on the headphone jack.
Variation and Confusion
Bear with me here in this section as it is quite important if you are interested in getting a MH1. Let’s begin by explaining two standards used in making the 3.5mm TRRS plug on headset – OMTP and CTIA (both are organizations for mobile standards). For OMTP, the TRRS plug is wired as [Left-Right-Mic-Ground] (from tip-to-sleeve); for CTIA, the TRRS is wired as [Left-Right-Ground-Mic]. Since OMTP was initially endorsed by Ericsson (and Nokia, which still uses the OMTP standard), all of their cellphone, including those under the Sony Ericsson branding, uses this standard. It also got adopted by a few other cellphone manufacturers as standard before mid 2011, such as LG, Motorola, Sony and Samsung. In mid 2010, the OMTP organization transitioned itself into another organization (the WAC, if you are interest to know), and the OMTP standard for headset was subsequently being phased out by most manufacturers within the following year (* it takes time to sell off old models) in favor of the CTIA standard. Part of the big reason for adapting the CTIA standard might be due to the fact that it is the standard used by Apple on their iDevice, which represent a big share of the headset market. Standardization demands from political groups (i.e. the EU) also played a role to push for one headset standard that will work on both Android and iOS, as well as most dumbphones (except for Nokia, which doesn’t like to play with other for now).
Now that we have learned about the two standards, let talks more specifically in MH1. When MH1 was first announced, it was named ‘LiveSound’ under the Sony Ericsson brand and complied with the old OMTP standard. But when Sony bought out Ericssion’s share of the company and began to introduce their own Sony Xperia brand of Android smarphone, they start to adapt the CTIA standard on all their headsets. The new MH1 (*referred as MH1C, ’C’ is short for ‘CTIA’ presumably) is then renamed as ‘Smart Headset’ to differentiate itself from the old ‘LiveSound’ version. It was supposed to be a fairly easy and clean transition, but unfortunately it isn’t. Some of the new MH1(C) with CTIA wiring is still being sold on various part of the world under the ‘LiveSound’ moniker while other parts of the world already use the new ‘Smart Headset’ moniker. One thing for sure, if you see a MH1 with an old Sony Ericsson logo on the side, it is the OMTP version and not compatible to the newer Android smartphone. If it only has Sony logo stamped on the side, and being referred as ‘smart headset’ or with model name MH1C, then likely it is the new CTIA version. However, the only sure-fire way is to check with the seller for compatibility. In the event that you have acquired the wrong version for your cellphone, don’t despair – an inexpensive TRRS smart adapter will allow OTMP headset to work on a CTIA cellphone (and vice versa).
- credits to ClieOS
I remember there was a topic a while back, but do "5.1/7.1 surround sound" headphones actually produce a surround sound effect?
Is there a noticeable difference between simulated surround sound headphones and actual surround sound headphones?
If surround sound headphones actually do produce a genuine surround effect then continue... if not we are done with this line of questioning.
I have ~$250 to spend on a pair of headphones.
Priority #1 is great sound.
Priority #2 is a good, real, surround sound effect
Priority #2.5 optical in on the base as oppose to USB so I can avoid PS4 incompatibility
Priority #3 it would be great if they were good for games and music
Priority #4 is if they are a gaming headset the mic HAS to be either discrete or removable. No mic is best.
Priority #5 it would be nice if they did not look ridiculous (LEDs, bright colors, etc)
Priority #6 wireless would be nice, but is not absolutely required.
So GAF, suggestions?
No the other ranges of the headphone are good, but yeah the peakiness of the treble is definitely kind of noticeable once you've heard something more natural sounding.
Is noise isolation a priority?
Nope.
Indoor use only. I have four really nice speakers (2x Klipsch bookshelf and 2x Athena towers). I use the Athenas in stereo but they are so loud they disturb my roommates and even my neighbors. I do not have the money to buy a high end sub and center speaker to match them... so my next best option is a good pair of headphones.
My apologies if they weren't your thing, but hearing the volume was low has me kind of skeptical...They aren't too power hungry at all, so it was probably your source. My second suggestion would be the Logitech UE600, but I really do suspect that either the pair you received were defective or your source is to blame.