• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

AMD RX 6000 'Big Navi' GPU Event | 10/28/2020 @ 12PM EST/9AM PST/4PM UK

Bo_Hazem

Banned
301164-redteam-communitty-forum-1260x709.jpg
 

MiguelItUp

Member
Wtf is up with the illiterate trolls in here thinking that AMD "lost"?

AMD just showed tech that is essentially on par with NVIDIA's tech while using less power and charging less money.

That is not a loss whatsoever.

Edit: I caught up with the show after my morning work meeting, so sorry if I offended any nerds for missing any special intricacies. What I saw was mentioned above and essentially was the TL'DR for me. 🤷‍♂️

Also, also, this isn't rage-filled, lol. So don't go all knee jerk rage on me. I'm one of the few people here that DGAF about hostile debates, name calling, toxicity, etc. Go to someone else for that, you're wasting your time coming at me with any of that. If anything I'm someone that's known for typing lol, lmao, etc. too much. :)
 
Last edited:

llien

Banned
It is not surprising RDNA2 pwns Ampere, one could see it coming and we have talked about that many times.

Curious how there is no cheaper than $579 option, although it's pretty damn legit to ask $79 more for for 18% faster card with double the RAM.

649 for 6800. To expensive. They blew it.
Was it sarcasm? I hope this was sarcasm.
 

Andodalf

Banned
Wtf is up with the illiterate trolls in here thinking that AMD "lost"?

AMD just showed tech that is essentially on par with NVIDIA's tech while using less power and charging less money.

That is not a loss whatsoever.

AMD showed that in very specific situations they can match the power, but have done nothing to address RT or DLSS. When those are added in, Results could be a blowout in favor of Nvidia.
 
Why would anyone spend $1k for a board with 16G of VRAM vs. 24G and limited RT capabilities. You get what you pay for. I'll pay that extra $500 for that RT/DLSS/24G of RAM

How is that 3090 that you paid 700 dollars over market price for working out? I definitely expected you to be super positive on AMD in this thread. Can't think of a single reason why you wouldn't be! No correlation at all!
 

Okamiden

Member
basically RT uses DX api only using CUs. I doubt its as good out the gate as an RTX. and they are only WORKING on their DLSS equivalent now, buit its coming.
That explains subpar ray-tracing performance in first games for next-gen consoles. Hopes for a RT cores are dead I guess. Pretty sad.
 

MiguelItUp

Member
AMD showed that in very specific situations they can match the power, but have done nothing to address RT or DLSS. When those are added in, Results could be a blowout in favor of Nvidia.
Other than saying they exist, that's true. Good point.

I guess that's the part that's essentially still up in the air.
 

Doncabesa

Member
Wtf is up with the illiterate trolls in here thinking that AMD "lost"?

AMD just showed tech that is essentially on par with NVIDIA's tech while using less power and charging less money.

That is not a loss whatsoever.
it's pc gpu warriors, people stan for anything
AMD showed that in very specific situations they can match the power, but have done nothing to address RT or DLSS. When those are added in, Results could be a blowout in favor of Nvidia.
they talked about super resolution
 

RoboFu

One of the green rats
so $200 more than a next gen console and SAME PRICE as a 3080 you can get a 3090 equivalent GPU. its tempting for sure.
 

CrustyBritches

Gold Member
Man, AMD just brought the heat! Let's see

As we're getting a clearer picture of RDNA 2, I'm now pretty sure that AMD showed the Navi 21 XT in their teaser slide at the Zen 3 reveal event. Navi 21 XT is to target or beat the 3080 at $699, not a penny less going by Zen 3 pricing.

The XTX is likely being saved for the RDNA 2 event on the 28th. This will probably target the 3090 and be priced at $999. The XL will target 3070 at $499. If AMD can show better general raster performance at every tier, then Nvidia could be forced into releasing 3070ti and 3080ti models at competitive price points.
I missed the XT and XL, but bang-on for the 6900XTX. Thanks, Su Bae, for taking my advice on pricing.
 

Sethbacca

Member
That explains subpar ray-tracing performance in first games for next-gen consoles. Hopes for a RT cores are dead I guess. Pretty sad.

If nothing else it begs the question of how Sony appears to be getting better RT performance out of the PS5 than Xbox to this point (Keywords = appears). Makes me wonder if there is some secret sauce yet to be revealed.
 

RoboFu

One of the green rats
That explains subpar ray-tracing performance in first games for next-gen consoles. Hopes for a RT cores are dead I guess. Pretty sad.

Nah thats good thing in the long run. proprietary hardware holds back development and inflates prices.
 
Last edited:

Andodalf

Banned
If nothing else it begs the question of how Sony appears to be getting better RT performance out of the PS5 than Xbox to this point (Keywords = appears). Makes me wonder if there is some secret sauce yet to be revealed.

Nothing indicates this, only that devs have prioritized working on PS5s RT in games over Xbox. The biggest example DMC has marketing for Sony so of course wants to have that in great shape day 1.
 

Black_Stride

do not tempt fate do not contrain Wonder Woman's thighs do not do not
50 dollars too expensive for the 6800XT.
But thankfully they are right into highend again and hopefully Nvidia shitting themselves into a price drop for the RTX 3070 and RTX 3075.

If SuperResolution works well and can give DLSS a run for its money......and have higher support due to console training.
 

CuNi

Member
Benchmarks were shown without OC and Zen3.
Then boost from Zen3+autoOC.


Oh, you sweet summer child, I hope you have Valerian nearby.

Oh, must have missed that.
Once someone posts slides, I'll try to take a look at that.
Gotta say, AMD really did surprise me here and I command them on that! Did NOT expect that much.
I'd love a more technical breakdown though like, maybe I missed it, but I know Ampere has RT-Cores that only do RTX calculations. Does 6000-Series also have dedicated Raytrace hardware or is it done through shaders etc. ?

Damn I was so set on a 3080, now I really gotta re-evaluate this. Hope stock will be better on those cards.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
I think I'm in for a 6900XT if I can get one before the end of the year. I'm guessing I won't have a chance.
 

Sethbacca

Member
Nothing indicates this, only that devs have prioritized working on PS5s RT in games over Xbox. The biggest example DMC has marketing for Sony so of course wants to have that in great shape day 1.

You'd think all of this would be being showcased on the more powerful box (at least on paper). It's just odd, but whatever. I'm taking the wait and see approach here.
 

Rikkori

Member
Keep in mind every single game will be made around RDNA 2 (consoles). So if you don't plan to upgrade every cycle then these cards will age better than Ampere.
 

Andodalf

Banned
Oh, must have missed that.
Once someone posts slides, I'll try to take a look at that.
Gotta say, AMD really did surprise me here and I command them on that! Did NOT expect that much.
I'd love a more technical breakdown though like, maybe I missed it, but I know Ampere has RT-Cores that only do RTX calculations. Does 6000-Series also have dedicated Raytrace hardware or is it done through shaders etc. ?

Damn I was so set on a 3080, now I really gotta re-evaluate this. Hope stock will be better on those cards.

No RT specific Hardware, no Tensor hardware equivalent either. Without those AMD needed to blow Nvidia out of the water for it to really be close.
 

Azurro

Banned
Nothing indicates this, only that devs have prioritized working on PS5s RT in games over Xbox. The biggest example DMC has marketing for Sony so of course wants to have that in great shape day 1.

That's conspiracy theory territory. DMC has RT because Sony is ahead of Microsoft in this area, Sony is just ahead of them in general. The whole launching the SX with no games would tell you this.

BTW, unless I'm wrong, I thought each CU has hardware raytracing support, at the very least consoles do. The implementation is different, but let's see results.
 
Last edited:
Wtf is up with the illiterate trolls in here thinking that AMD "lost"?

AMD just showed tech that is essentially on par with NVIDIA's tech while using less power and charging less money.

That is not a loss whatsoever.

You're calling people illiterate while focusing on the two points that matter significantly less? A $50 haircut and 20 watts of total board power? Ok, LMFAO.

Seriously dude, you're the dumb one if you think that's the argument.

It's the lack of performance in ray tracing and uncertainty about a true dlss 2.0 competitor vs the uncertainty of 10gb of vram being enough that is the discussion. Amd's pricing was only going to tilt the discussion heavily in their favor if it was much more aggressive. Now they're just competing on features. Do you want more forward thinking and advanced features/performance now? Choose 3080. Do you want 5 years out of your card for SURE without compromise on vram intensive settings? Choose Amd
 

Andodalf

Banned
You'd think all of this would be being showcased on the more powerful box (at least on paper). It's just odd, but whatever. I'm taking the wait and see approach here.

DMC has a marketing agreement for Sony. Why would they show Xbox? Consoles don't really have any big RT titles rn, Sony's first party stuff is about it
 

CuNi

Member
No RT specific Hardware, no Tensor hardware equivalent either. Without those AMD needed to blow Nvidia out of the water for it to really be close.

Thats a bummer. I hope we'll get benchmarks soon-ish and not in the NVIDIA way on sales day.
Really wondering how RT On vs RT Off performance looks like in a direct comparison etc. also with non AMD CPUs or without Rage.
 

tkscz

Member
AMD showed that in very specific situations they can match the power, but have done nothing to address RT or DLSS. When those are added in, Results could be a blowout in favor of Nvidia.

Whats wrong with the software based RT they showed? While it is stuck to DX for now, I don't think OpenGL or Vulkin would be far behind.
 
Top Bottom