American police killed more people in March than the UK has since 1900

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think every cop should have a gun on their person on the job. If there's an armed situation then call in the armed police division or something. The militarization of the police has to stop.
 
So what if they've killed that many.

If the shootings were justified, there shouldn't be a problem.

Besides it is not like they are just going along killing anyone they see. Most people killed by police are hardcore criminals. I seriously doubt they are going to missed much.
 
I'm surprised this bullshit thread hasn't been sent to die yet.
How is it bullshit?

EDIT -

So what if they've killed that many.

If the shootings were justified, there shouldn't be a problem.

Besides it is not like they are just going along killing anyone they see. Most people killed by police are hardcore criminals. I seriously doubt they are going to missed much.
It either says something about our police forces or the culture of the U.S. Take your pick.
 
You got anymore numbers you want to make up for us?

Before you get banned for pointless agressivity, could you at least provide arguments to explain your position so that most people visiting this thread don't think it's just another account suicide?
 
During the years 1066-1688 there were precisely zero reports of people scalding themselves on McDonald's coffee in the British Isles.


In the last month alone some guy from Utah spilled a cup on his ankle and experienced some mild discomfort.

That's 7464 months against one month - do the math, people!

But this compares relatively current date with overall data in the last hundred years through the industrial age leading up to now.

Thats still far more relevant than the year 1066....

I know you were joking but its still not close enough of a comparison for the punchline to have full affect.
 
Before you get banned for pointless agressivity, could you at least provide arguments to explain your position so that most people visiting this thread don't think it's just another account suicide?
I did. It's on page 3. No one bothered to read it. Or I was correct and couldn't be refuted and people would rather rage.
 
but what about torture tho: nobody beats us at that, I've heard of several prisoners killed by Torchwood s1-2 reruns in Dartmoor alone
 
I did. It's on page 3. No one bothered to read it. Or I was correct and couldn't be refuted and people would rather rage.

You didn't post on page 3 so could you link them?
found it
Lol at the op using scare tactics "facts". First he uses a wikipedia page as a source that literally says "THIS PAGE IS INCOMPLETE" right at the top. That same page has data that goes back to the late 70s. The think progress link just tops it off.


I'm sure the situation isn't great but the op is a total joke.
e2: while the methodology isn't perfect here, I don't think it would take more than 3 months to make the comparison the OP is making....
Funnily enough there's articles out there making that exact same comparison...
 
Out of curiosity, how would USA compare to all of Europe in terms of police killing people?


It would be exceptionally difficult to measure, since each country has different ways of reporting these statistics.

However, we've had a good fight about it in this thread using shonky comparisons.
 
You got anymore numbers you want to make up for us?
Number of times British cops fired guns in 2013: 3, totaling in zero deaths

# of deaths in police custody across Wales and UK 1990-2012

For some reason, they're able to keep their yearly numbers lower than what America does routinely in days. And to add to some more skewing, U.S. statistics keepers are not required to report 'incidental' deaths in custody, after the fact, or related incidents if there are no charges pressed.

Whatever the case, this amount of violence is strictly American and that's what we're discussing.
 
The only reason population magnitude or geographical area would be relevant in this discussion is if the timeframes were even remotely similar (Id est: 1 month in the United States of America versus, say, 1 year in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.) However, considering the absurd timespan that is lended to the U.K., I would say it becomes increasingly irrelevant to bring up either of the aforementioned factors.

The armaments of the masses are the sole legitimate reason I see for the railery against this statistic. Even then, it strikes me as an excuse, considering the restraint (or lack thereof) that has been observed in the police force of the U.S.A.

I suppose this result should not come as a shock, but yet it is.
I weep for the innocents who shall continue to die.
 
Even though it's not a great comparison, keep in mind that the police also aren't required to keep track of all the people they kill. I'm positive that the numbers we're working with aren't high enough.
 
So what if they've killed that many.

If the shootings were justified, there shouldn't be a problem.

Besides it is not like they are just going along killing anyone they see. Most people killed by police are hardcore criminals. I seriously doubt they are going to missed much.

It's almost like

a) USA gun culture is beyond fucked up
b) USA police act like maniacs compared to more civilized western country police forces
c) USA social policies and incarceration heavy criminal justice system combined with profitable prisons and War On Drugs produces huge amounts of hardened criminals
d) all of the above
 
Is there a graph showing deaths caused by police per year as a percentage of the population? Curious to see the trend on that.
 
Are we counting pre-independent Ireland? I heard that was a bad time

The majority of these aren't going to be counted as police shootings but Army shootings instead. Ditto with the UK and terrorist action i.e. The Iranian Embassy siege in 1980 not police but Army (S.A.S.)
 
It's almost like

a) USA gun culture is beyond fucked up
b) USA police act like maniacs compared to more civilized western country police forces
c) USA social policies and incarceration heavy criminal justice system combined with profitable prisons and War On Drugs produces huge amounts of hardened criminals
d) all of the above

Yep. In a nutshell.
 
chart-comparing-police-shootings-in-2011.jpg


BvlSlWzIQAA2Il5.png
 
US = Police Force
UK = Police Service


Spot the difference?

Also, the highly restrictive gun laws in the UK are a relatively modern feature of UK society, pre 1950's people in the UK had easy access to guns.
 
Just a tiny thing, when I went to Heathrow a year ago, I saw my first and only ever real firearm, being carried by armed police. It unsettled the fuck out of me. Genuinely can't fathom the sight of guns being a regular occurrence in the UK.

Generally I feel like we're bought up to appreciate guns as being necessary in many circumstances, and an enjoyable part of fictional entertainment, but still something to be fucking terrified of. Not just something to respect, something to fear and not admire.
 
Yeah. I'm not saying there's no problem there but it's kind of a poor comparison.

It's not a poor comparision. The UK population is 64m, the USA population is 318m, if the rate of police killings was the same then the UK would kill the same amount of people in 5 months as the USA does in 1 month. The UK is averaging one killing a year for the last 4 years, if you scale the UK up to a USA sized nation that would be 16 killings in 4 years, the USA has 111 killings in March.

You people are going on like the UK is the size of the Vatican City or some shit.
 
It's not a poor comparision. The UK population is 64m, the USA population is 318m, if the rate of police killings was the same then the UK would kill the same amount of people in 5 months as the USA does in 1 month. The UK is averaging one killing a year for the last 4 years, if you scale the UK up to a USA sized nation that would be 16 killings in 4 years, the USA has 111 killings in March.

You people are going on like the UK is the size of the Vatican City or some shit.
This.
 
Semi off-topic: in 2013, the German police shot 42 times on target, 8 were deadly. That's all. Other years look the same.
Oh yeah, well, once the NYPD in 2012 fired 16 shots, hit three pedestrians directly and six others with fragments.

They did get the single gunman who was like three feet in front of them though.
 
US = Police Force
UK = Police Service


Spot the difference?

Also, the highly restrictive gun laws in the UK are a relatively modern feature of UK society, pre 1950's people in the UK had easy access to guns.

It's like the staff of Hermes vs. the staff of Asclepius in medicine. One is a symbol of commerce and the other is a symbol of healing. Guess which one American doctors use.
 
You people are going on like the UK is the size of the Vatican City or some shit.

Straws, clutching at.

What I find amusing is that many Americans seem to think that people in the UK don't enjoy as much freedom, being denied the opportunity to tool up like a militia.

I can guarantee if the people of the UK were offered a referendum on introducing gun laws, American style, it would be rejected in huge numbers, by at least 80%.

There simply isn't the cultural need or desire to have the 'freedom' to kill your neighbour.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom