What? Now you are just trolling. I installed Fortnite when it moved to UE5 just to see what it was like and it had the worst shader stutter of any game I have ever played, like every 10 seconds as something new spawned on screen.
Sure, because fixing that is perfectly feasible while fixing UE5 is beyond the realm of possibility.
Yeah no shit. Games back then were pushing boundaries year after year, which stopped being the case when publishers decided to focus on consoles, so less impresive stuff was being made with PC as a focus. The days of stuff like Crysis of DOOM 3 being released are long gone.You must have grown up in a different timeline than me.
In my timeline PC games always ran terrible on the PCs they got released on.
Usually it required me to buy a new PC for a game I just bought to run well.
Dunno, haven't played Fortnite in a while. But I can give you a few examples of great looking games that run like a dream: KCD2, RDR2, Cyberpunk (talking about PC ofc), Metro Exodus, DOOM Eternal. I know it isn't wizardry, just talent and effort.
Isn't it weird how the game has to run at 600p on those consoles?
Why do you humor a troll? There's always these idiots salivating whenever a PC game runs badly as they see it as an opportunity to be worthless trolls. Ignore them.
Gotta be honest, I don't know.
In what timeline there are no traversal stutters on some UE5 games on consoles??
It's the same way on PS5 pro regardless of the graphics option I pick. Smooth at stand still, but once I do a quick pan of the camera, it stutters so bad. Hoping they issue a fix across all platforms.
Not sarcasm.
This is what you signed up for when you decided to play modern games on a pc.
Pc has lots of problems. And who gets blamed? The user. Hardware not good enough. Outdated software. Wrong settings. There is a workaround.
It's never getting better.
I blame everyone.
Coming after users because Devs released a poor product. You're either a corporate whore or rofif reincarnated. Or both
USA was on the moon already, why dont they just fly up there again, should be super easy!
Games still push boundaries, especially with raytraycing, 4K and simulation complextiy.
I dont give a fuck about Wuchang, I tried to educate you how the engine it uses works on your PC.
Those are all last generation engines that are pushed to the limit. While Doom Eternal can do pathtracing, it is not an engine that is flexible to do games it wasnt made for.
Is it weird that developers chose 600p to make it run fluent on console?
Yep. CDPR dropping their engine for the Cyberpunk after spending so many years finally fixing it and having great performance on wide variety of devices is just annoying AF.
Yeah, youre right!
gamerant.com
That's the money already spend and Cyberpunk's engine is very performant and scalable.Yeah, youre right!
Why in their goddamn mind would CD Project Red drop such an amazing engine that took them YEARS to fix!
Oh, right....
CD Projekt Founders See Stunning $1 Billion Loss After Troubled Cyberpunk 2077 Release
CD Projekt Red founders lose a sum-total of $1 billion following the disastrous console launch of Cyberpunk 2077 earlier this week.
This game doesn't really have a problem with shader stutter, that is mostly solved on PC already. With the work arounds you mentioned. Although odd that you would call it that, it's not really a work around just a simple solution to not being able to include shaders already compiled for a fixed hardware platform.
I'm also seeing similar performance to what I saw on E33. 3840x1600 DLSS 310.3 balanced on a 3090 (latest driver) and 5950x. It's absolutely fine imo. Quite enjoying it tbh
E33 has traversal and minor shader compilation stutter, and the game camera skips frames unless you use a combination of very specific settings. Cutscenes have uneven frame pacing.
Given market size, complexity of configurations and inherrent problem of ultrathick windows layer it's understandable that people mock PC gaming. As it is and will be sub-par in terms of optimization and stability. And you can't really blame devs as they not obliged to work for free just to make PCMR guys happy.
5090 runs pixel art games perfectly fine doesn't mean that there is no problem
It is running at 90 fps though.Thought you were joking. And then I saw this… damnnn
Is there a frame rate cap option? I'd imagine that capping at 60 would help achieve a higher internal resolution.
Good devs always were able to make their games run well and also have a unique art style. Bad (or at least given too little time) devs, which there are way too many today, never could and never will, cause they never fully learn all capabilities of their work tools. It's now only more apparant because even bad devs can create assets that look alright or even great but then run like shit. Previuosly you had to be better to get anything out. Kinda started with Unity and patches being even a thing on consoles. That was easier (or just cheaper) to manage than Unreal, Cry, idTech and a lot of those games did not run well, often even with visuals that looked not demanding at all. Began with mostly Indies, but AAA added or rather substracted also insufficient alpha and beta stages in the workflow and then games get shoved out of the door running just bad sometimes only on certain configurations and or with severe bugs. Same with those last remaining inhouse engines e.g. EA, Ubi or CDProject use. Sony's engines also had some problems in some of their PC ports. It often is not even months of work that is missing, but a few weeks and almost all embarassing hickups and damage to sales could be avoided. Just bad management, and has nothing to do inherently with a tool.
You mean their 980Game looks and runs really well on my PC
Maybe some of those steam players should upgrade their 2000 series cards
I never played Wuchang, so I wouldnt know, but I did mention in my very first post that shader precompilation is a solution to one of the problems.
When it happens on console it is the developers fault for not optimizing enough. As for the other engines, they arent pushing tech as much, and are highly optimized towards specific use cases.
Yeah thats fair, should have clarified that I meant on weaker hardware.
it's not a CPU limit, i locked the game to 60 FPS for extra stability. the game is incredibly GPU bound all the timeFunny how you are CPU-limited half the time
Frametimes aside.. i couldn't play a game that bounces from 40ish to 60ish all the time while moving or turning the camera.
The cutscenes are the only things in the game that affects my enjoyment of it. I find traversing the levels absolutely fine personally and the battles never seem to be problematic either limited to 60 and gsync'd in the Nvidia CP. I've been using Lyall's fix since it released and I think the cutscenes were optimised for 30fps and have to accept the switch to unlocking that comes with the caveat of potential unstabilty issues.
