As a consumer, I like Nintendo's policy to maintain games' prices

Apathy

Member
" thanks Nintendo for letting new give you $60 for a game that's four years old, I wish I could give you more. You make me feel so special"
 
I don't understand why everyone is confused by this. If I choose to buy any game in physical form, I always ask myself if it's gonna have resale value. I buy plenty of cheap ass digital stuff but the whole reason I'd choose to buy something physical over digital is that I know it will have some resale value.

It's not just Nintendo stuff either. It's always better to buy your limited JRPGs and stuff in physical form and hold onto them. What stuff ends up being worth money should be obvious to most on this forum.
 
All my christmas money went to PSN this year because Nintendo decided they were above having a sale. .

As did mine, picked up some good deals on PSN and steam. Nintendo first party on the e-shop? Nope. NES mini? LMFAO. Readily available 3ds units in stores or online at normal price? Try again.
 

TheOfficeMut

Unconfirmed Member
I don't. I complain about my job not paying me fairly, I blame myself for not managing to find one that does, but complaining about the price of a luxury item that rarely drops because the product is good and people find that the price matches the value that they get out of it is silly.

Look, everything goes on sale at some point, even Nintendo games. Be patient and be wise with your money, no matter how much money you make. I almost never pay full price for things if I think it's too high, and I'm not just talking about games. Since we're on the topic of Nintendo games, though, I'll mention that I got Donkey Kong Country Tropical Freeze and Captain Toad Treasure Tracker on official sales, I got Super Mario 3D World and Yoshi's New Island when they were released as Nintendo Selects, and I got Mario Kart 8 + New Super Mario Bros. U for $60 when MK8 launched and Nintendo had that deal where you could get a free game. Stuff I got at full price, like Splatoon and Smash Bros. U, I think you would agree are worth every cent.

lol okay. I really won't hassle you to recollect every time you purchased a "luxury" item and whether you complained about having to spend as much money as you did but I find it very hard to believe that you never complain about having to spend as much money as you do without asking why an item couldn't simply be cheaper.

You keep referring to games as luxury items, which they are, but to many they're a way to keep you from spending more money. In my case they keep me glued at home when I'm actually looking to save money so that I can be thoroughly entertained without having to go out and spend money.
 

EloquentM

aka Mannny
60 dollar games are good for industry. What's good for Nintendo is good for industry. However OP wants to rationalize that is his choice but I don't think premium priced games are a bad thing for this industry at all. More pubs and retailers should try to keep games at a premium price like Nintendo does. That's how I know the games are good
 
I don't understand why everyone is confused by this. If I choose to buy any game in physical form, I always ask myself if it's gonna have resale value.

Wouldn't it better to just rent from gamefly or similar service, if a game's resale value factors into your spending decisions?
 

dhlt25

Member
IDK, on 1 side I really fucking HATE buying a game day1 to be discounted a month later.
I mean I LOVE Bloodborne but I probably could have waited a few months and buy it for way less.
The result is I probably spent more per purchase on 3DS than on PS4.
I'm not complaining I have enough games and I'm happy with my purchases but I hate the feeling of being fleeced because I want a game earlier than the market crash predicted.
I like playing with the games not with getting the games.
Take TLG or FFXV, these games I'm going to wait like a sucker till they get heavily marked down before even thinking of getting them.
I bought W101 day one and I didn't even play it.
Turns out I can't find W101 anymore because Nintendo isn't stupid in flooding the market with crap and I'll find copies of FFXV 5 years from now for cheaper than I can find some mobile games.

umm sorry to burst your bubble but you can get W101 in great condition for about 20 bucks used from gamestop, amazon etc. unless you're talking about new that is

I'm a nintendo fan but I buy their system 1 gen after when game can be find for dirt cheap online, just bought a wiiu and went on a spending spree and got pretty much all i want from the wii and wiiu lib for much less than msrp. Did the same thing with the gamecube years ago when it bombed. None of my money goes to them, too bad.
 
Excuse me?

...Oh well, you're far from the only person who needs to justify their gaming habit by attaching some monetary value to it.

Just wish people could appreciate games for being what they are, pure and simple.

Also, I spent $60 on FF XIV at launch. Premium price for a premium fucking product :/
 
60 dollar games are good for industry. What's good for Nintendo is good for industry. However OP wants to rationalize that is his choice but I don't think premium priced games are a bad thing for this industry at all. More pubs and retailers should try to keep games at a premium price like Nintendo does. That's how I know the games are good
Lmao
 

geordiemp

Member
Nintendo stock holders need more mugs like OP to generate Nintendo like profits.

I guess its not as bad as whales in fremium games.
 
I've read some crazy shit on here over the years, but this seriously takes the cake. You aren't getting anything more by paying more, and Nintendo literally has zero fucking clue who you are.
 
you know op, someone said that to me on another nintendo thread some weeks ago. i think the thread was about the stupid price of the WiiU and the OP in that thread found it outrageous how the prices never drop when the PS4/XB1 price this holidays were below 250$.

i agreed with the OP in that thread, nintendo isnt a fucking Rolex or a Patek Philippe watch. makes it hard to buy a nintendo console when it isnt going to be your main because the HW isnt cheap nor is the software even if it's old releases.

so as a consumer i dont like how they do things.
 

PKrockin

Member
You need to look up opportunity cost in an economic book or on Wikipedia. Anything with a smaller opportunity cost is a relative investment.
Relative investment? Where did you hear that term? Consumer products that depreciate over time are not investments. You might as well literally call anything an investment. My breakfast cereal is an investment in my productivity today. I could resell this vacuum cleaner, so it's an investment. I'm being pedantic and derailing the thread, yes, but I know people who think they're being smart with their money because they invest a lot... in cars, four-wheelers, and other expensive toys. I'm not saying you cashed out your IRA for an NES library, but I believe the way we use "investing" to refer to cool stuff we have no intention of profiting off of is helping create the savings crisis we are seeing in America.
 

Sai-kun

Banned
60 dollar games are good for industry. What's good for Nintendo is good for industry. However OP wants to rationalize that is his choice but I don't think premium priced games are a bad thing for this industry at all. More pubs and retailers should try to keep games at a premium price like Nintendo does. That's how I know the games are good

this dude bought the division at launch

Apparently I need to take up day drinking.

it's never too late to start drinking for new years eve bro
 

Koren

Member
As someone who doesn't sell games, I hate this policy.
Well, I rather like it...

Each time I buy a game on Playstation, I wonder if I should wait (and risk of not finding the game and paying MORE later, that happened to me several times) or buy it right now and pay full price. I have a list of games I want to buy, and I check price and availability from time to time, it's a kind of hassle.

At least, with Nintendo, they're usually a bit cheaper, and buying them day 1 doesn't mean you'll regret not having wait a couple weeks/months later...

I also think it would be better for the editors if they weren't expected to slash the price after a short period...
 

TheOfficeMut

Unconfirmed Member
60 dollar games are good for industry. What's good for Nintendo is good for industry. However OP wants to rationalize that is his choice but I don't think premium priced games are a bad thing for this industry at all. More pubs and retailers should try to keep games at a premium price like Nintendo does. That's how I know the games are good

Hey, I feel you, man. It's why I pay $15 for a brown-bagged 40. A $15 40 in a brown paper bag must be worth the price and it certainly has to be better than all of the other 40s selling for $2.
 
I don't understand why everyone is confused by this. If I choose to buy any game in physical form, I always ask myself if it's gonna have resale value. I buy plenty of cheap ass digital stuff but the whole reason I'd choose to buy something physical over digital is that I know it will have some resale value.

It's not just Nintendo stuff either. It's always better to buy your limited JRPGs and stuff in physical form and hold onto them. What stuff ends up being worth money should be obvious to most on this forum.

I'd rather spend my time doing something worthwhile that pondering how much a game might sell for when I eventually complete it.
 
60 dollar games are good for industry. What's good for Nintendo is good for industry. However OP wants to rationalize that is his choice but I don't think premium priced games are a bad thing for this industry at all. More pubs and retailers should try to keep games at a premium price like Nintendo does. That's how I know the games are good

Seriously though, why are Nintendo games so cheap? How will you recognize the incredible quality of a Nintendo title of they start out at the same price as those inferior third party titles? The starting price for a Nintendo game should be $80 like in the N64 days! In fact they should be $100!
 
In fact, why are Mondeo games so cheap? How will you recognize the incredible quality of a Nintendo title of they start out at the same price as those inferior third party titles? The starting price for a Nintendo game should be $80 like in the N64 days!

If a game costs $300, you KNOW it'll be quality. I mean, how else is quality/value judged other than the price tag at the shop?
 

EloquentM

aka Mannny
In fact, why are Mondeo games so cheap? How will you recognize the incredible quality of a Nintendo title of they start out at the same price as those inferior third party titles? The starting price for a Nintendo game should be $80 like in the N64 days!
At least when I bought an $80 game I knew I'd be getting the full game and not a piecemeal game that's instantly discounted two weeks later like 3rd party games in the industry currently are.
 

TheOfficeMut

Unconfirmed Member
Seriously though, why are Nintendo games so cheap? How will you recognize the incredible quality of a Nintendo title of they start out at the same price as those inferior third party titles? The starting price for a Nintendo game should be $80 like in the N64 days! In fact they should be $100!

Put them in a brown paper bag and their quality skyrockets.

At least when I bought an $80 game I knew I'd be getting the full game and not a piecemeal game that's instantly discounted two weeks later like 3rd party games in the industry currently are.

You for real? Have some self control if you're so concerned about plummeting prices. A few weeks after a game releases and you can save yourself $20. I think Reggie said it best when he asked what's wrong with you.
 
I don't understand why everyone is confused by this. If I choose to buy any game in physical form, I always ask myself if it's gonna have resale value. /QUOTE]

Wouldn't it better to just rent from gamefly, if a game's resale value factors into your spending habits?

Well for me, I also collect the stuff that I like. I think it would be unwise to collect anything that didn't hold/increase in value. If I want to buy something new now days I usually sell something from my collection to fund it.
 

nbnt

is responsible for the well-being of this island.
I get you OP. It's like, you buy a $60 game now and then others buy it for half just a couple of months later?! You're like, ya'll fuckers gotta pay the same price as I paid day 1, I don't care if you're buying it a month or a year later, you should all pay the same price!
 
Hm...

$60 for Smash Wii U

Or

3 games for PS4 $60:
Mortal Kombat XL on sale
Street Fighter V on sale
Ratchet & Clank on sale

Reselling:
Get $45 for Smash Wii U - not enough to cover a new game purchase from Nintendo. Unless you get used.

3 PS4 games: $5-10 each. Enough to get a fourth game.
 

Apathy

Member
Nintendo fans are crazy. Like say what you will about Xbox and sony fans being children over console wars. Nintendo fans take crazy to a whole new level
 
This thread has taught me that people have weird buying habits. For most non-essentials, the thought process is usually

- do I want the thing?
- Do I have enough disposable cash to pay for the thing without leaving me broke?

I can't imagine the day to day life of someone who has to consider if everything is an investment before purchasing.
 

joecanada

Member
My reasoning, in short, is that I can consider buying Nintendo games as a kind of investment. If I buy a game and don't like it, or don't want to keep it, I can resell it for a reasonable price. Investing into AAA gaming on other platforms out of sale is basically just paying a premium fee to get the games early, as it has become a policy for most other developers to eventually reduce the price of the game to a bargain.

I'm somewhat cynical. Please produce a list of all Nintendo games that increased in value after purchase
 

Fandangox

Member
60 dollar games are good for industry. What's good for Nintendo is good for industry. However OP wants to rationalize that is his choice but I don't think premium priced games are a bad thing for this industry at all. More pubs and retailers should try to keep games at a premium price like Nintendo does. That's how I know the games are good

Okay this is Poe's law
 

bomblord1

Banned
As a person who just sold 3 older Nintendo games and was able to get a brand new $60 game and Pokemon Sun also new with the trade in money.

I wholeheartedly agree OP.
 
As a person who just sold 3 older Nintendo games and was able to get a brand new $60 game and Pokemon Sun also new with it.

I wholeheartedly agree OP.

But if Nintendo games went on sale and dropped in price like other games, you wouldn't need to sell 3 games to afford 2 new ones.

It's fine to just say you don't mind paying a higher price down the line. You don't need to try and spin it to justify it.
 

Anticol

Banned
Some people really go to extremes in order to justify their choices and feel good with themselves, this is crazy. If I was Nintendo I would increase the price of every game every 3 or 4 months that way my fans would feel amazing for buying at launch and I am sure I would get a ton of messages giving me thanks and all that.
 

bomblord1

Banned
But if Nintendo games went on sale and dropped in price like other games you wouldn't need to sell 3 games to afford 2 new ones.

I only bought 1 Nintendo game the other game was Dragon Quest Builders. And I got over $100 from selling 3 games precisely because they hold their value so well.

If Nintendo games dropped in price like other games I could have sold 6 and maybe have received $20.
 

fhqwhgads

Member
Nintendo is smart to do this. They realise how evergreen a lot of their titles can be, especially Mario titles, so why should they drop the price when the sales come regardless? There's a reason Mario Kart and New Super Mario Bros games very rarely go under 30 dollars, they're pretty damn good sellers. If I remember correctly there was something like Mario Kart DS getting nearly a million sales in the same vicinity as Mario Kart 7's release, that was insane.
 

nullref

Member
This position is probably only economically rational if your habits are heavily skewed towards buying almost all of your games at or near release, and then reselling a significant number of them. (That doesn't describe me; I'd be surprised if it describes most people.) Otherwise, you'll save more from the discounts you get on games that you only get around to 6 months, 2 years, etc. after release than you'd recoup from higher resale value.

I have no problem paying full retail at release for a game that I'm excited to play immediately, but I also pick up plenty of games for much cheaper, later. (Sometimes in less confident I'll like them, or they weren't on my radar, or I just had too many other games to play.) I've also never been big on reselling games.

I also have no real problem with Nintendo's approach if that's what they think works best for them, but I can't say it appeals to me that much as customer.
 
This thread has taught me that people have weird buying habits. For most non-essentials, the thought process is usually

- do I want the thing?
- Do I have enough disposable cash to pay for the thing without leaving me broke?

I can't imagine the day to day life of someone who has to consider if everything is an investment before purchasing.

It's the Scalper Mentality and no, I can't really think of what life would be like thinking that way either.
 
sure it is


Sure and because of this I don't usually by indie games. They're usually terrible. You ever notice that most indie games are sub 60. I wonder why.

bstngp.gif
 
Top Bottom