deary me i jest
seriously, this is the news limited take on it thats all
Don't worry, they won't, I've tried. Care to explain what's wrong with it? Government backed bank deposit guarantees for the big four, along with an increase in cash savings in general, have increased the deposits for the big four banks which is basically a source of "cheap lending" (compared to the alternatives at the moment). Supposedly a third is coming from the overseas bond market, which is a bit shit at the moment, meaning that third is expensive. Without the deposit guarantee, this slice could be even larger, meaning lending could be even more expensive.As the partner of someone who worked in corporate banking for many years, there is so much wrong with this sentence that I think my head is going to explode.
But I won't let facts get in the way of your incessant raging, so carry on.
No worries, I'm just tired and grumpy. And sometimes I get sensitive about these things, there are plenty of awesome people that work in banking it is hard when all you ever hear is negative stuff.
It doesn't matter how awesome you are, if you work for a public company you're ultimately answerable to arseholes.there are plenty of awesome people that work in banking it is hard when all you ever hear is negative stuff.
The cowboys in the banking industry give us a bad name, but at the same time, those cowboys are really really smart!
A scorched earth policy doesnt qualify as 'really really smart'.
I'm sure one of the bank excuses is the volatility of the EU, meaning there are risks associated with sourcing international funds, which is a good reason I think.
Also, I haven't read anything about the recent cut, but I doubt it has anything to do with avoiding effects of the EU.
And yes, I agree with ban too even if I knew choc was "kidding" lol
I'm pretty sure I read that someone testing it yanked their network cable after choosing cloud saves and games continued to save and load.so xbox cloud saves is shit
you choose cloud as your storage device and then it access that
no internet? no save game. XBL down? no save game
There is increasing evidence that even with your scorch proof mansion, your general health and welfare is poorer in a less equal society: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ7LzE3u7BwIt does when you have a scorch proof mansion and want a nice view!
The article I read the other day said the RBA shouldn't have even cut rates in the first place.
Also, uBank is still 6.11%, so yay for high interest rates!
It does when you have a scorch proof mansion and want a nice view!
It does when you have a scorch proof mansion and want a nice view!
Quite.
Also, the new xbox dash is pretty bad. I can get to grips with it fine, but ads are too big, key stuff is obscured behind extraneous layers (game library, friend list) and it's just not layed out all that intelligently - from a user perspective.
I much prefer either simplistic layout a la wii channels, or a systematic layout a la XMB. Hell, even the four-directional Gamecube home menu was far better - although it didnt have as much to deal with.
But hey, at least I know now that if I can buy a rock band song for my rock band setup free home, or I can buy dance central 2 content for my kinect free xbox or I can watch content on foxtel with my foxtel sub lacking xbox.
Also, I did bother to read the ToS upon updating.
Seems like Australians are able to get free repair or replacement for a major or minor hw failure according to section 15a.
Sure, they reference it (hard not to), but it's not why they cut rates. I don't even understand why they cut it really after reading the press release.direct quote from RBA press release
The sovereign credit and banking problems in Europe, to which European governments are still seeking to craft a full response, are likely to weigh on economic activity there over the period ahead.[/B] Financial markets have experienced considerable turbulence, and financing conditions have become much more difficult, especially in Europe. This, together with precautionary behaviour by firms and households, means that the likelihood of a further material slowing in global growth has increased. Commodity prices have reflected this, declining further over recent months and taking pressure off CPI inflation rates. This has increased the scope for some easing in monetary policy in a number of countries.
that would be the consumer protection act 2010 in action
I'll go. I'll bring a packet of gold stars so you can put them on everything.
Christmas with the family? I'm in Melbourne next Friday you should come have a few drinks! Or whatever the customary meeting up thing to do is in Melbourne.
Why you up in melb kritz? A holiday?
that would be the consumer protection act 2010 in action
Question: Has there ever been a successful melb-gaf meetup?
Also, unrelated, I will be in Melbourne next month from the 24th until either the 28th or 29th. The 28th is a Saturday.
So that's a thing.
Is that seriously how it works? I couldn't figure that shit out at all yesterday but if that's how it is, that's crap beyond belief. Sigh MS INDEED.so xbox cloud saves is shit
you choose cloud as your storage device and then it access that
no internet? no save game. XBL down? no save game
PS3 does it like this. saves locally then uploads, so its a backup and not relied upon.
Sigh microsoft.
Yeah I'll be keen aslong as I'm not too busy, I know I have a few friends planning trips to Melb in late January so I'll find out what weekends those are
Dick Smith might still have it for $189.I'm in the market for a 3DS.
Anyone know of any good deals in the Brisbane area?
I think Cookie has something on and was seeing if anyone else was free. I will be in Melbourne next Friday at 3pm!I thought there was talk of something MelGAF related happening this week over the Twitters? Or was it next week? It seemed to fizzle out either way.
Do they only do fries or can I get some thing else there?Anyone know where T.J. O'Handjobs is located in Melbourne? Might head there after getting some extra big-ass fries.
Who was in charge last time? That person isn't in charge this time.
Funny you should ask: http://www.smh.com.au/business/swan-tax-shakeup-targets-super-rich-20111205-1ofj9.htmlI guess you could ask the question.....if its morally and probably fiscally prudent to impose a rent tax over mining profits...... why not banks?
But they've got electrolytes.Yeah, well, I really don't think we have time for a hand job, Joe.
But they've got electrolytes.
By the way SydGaf Neil Gaiman is in town on the 28th and I am going to go see him. If you are also going to go see him, give us a shout.
DnDAusGaf, fuckin link to the character sheets.
It's fun, but can be 3ds throwing frustrating lol. Also my thumb is hurting from pressing on the a button too longMK7 is really fun online. Playing in GAF community, spotted a wild BowieZ!
1. Interest rate rituals and Christmas pantomimes
Crikey Canberra correspondent Bernard Keane writes:
You may be forgiven for being confused about what year it is. It was almost exactly a year ago that we were engaged in a debate about the big banks and how they pass on interest rate changes.
Back then, it was the big four passing on higher interest rate rises than the RBA was dishing out. Now its their -- for the moment -- refusal to pass on the latest cut.
There's plenty of ritual in all this. Wayne Swan attacks the banks. The opposition attacks Swan, and suggests that somehow -- without precisely saying what -- that he should be doing more to force the banks to do the right thing. The proximity of Christmas means that, yet again, the media can invoke Scrooge. The Bankers' Association runs the same lies about cost of borrowing. Yawn.
As Glenn Dyer noted yesterday, we're usually missing half the debate. Most of us don't reduce our mortgage repayments when interest rates fall, so the impacts on demand and areas like retailing are limited (this is the great, overlooked flaw in the arguments of those who believe monetary policy can do the "heavy lifting" of stimulating the Australian economy in the event of another financial crisis). And the media ignores the interests of savers, who stand to lose from falling interest rates.
There's also the simple reality that the RBA takes into account the willingness of banks to pass on rate cuts or rate rises in its decision-making. If the banks decided not to pass on any of Tuesday's rate cut, it'll keep cutting rates until they do, just as it took into account banks lifting rates higher than its own increases in 2010.
Instead, the real impact of the banks' failure to pass on any cuts is on business lending, which directly affects business activity and employment. But that, too, gets ignored by the media in favour of focusing on household mortgages.
The more frustrating aspect of the debate is that it reprises exactly the issues that Joe Hockey correctly raised in 2010 and which ended up going nowhere -- the need for an inquiry into the financial system and a resolution to the basic issue that banks have the role of utilities but are regulated like normal corporations. The government successfully deflected Hockey's well-timed push for a re-examination of financial sector regulation with a limited set of reforms aimed at improving competition, but nothing that was going to cause the big four to lose any sleep -- or any of their super-profits.
In truth, if people end up with the impression that Swan has been somehow remiss in his responsibilities as Treasurer by not being to jawbone the big banks into cutting rates as much as possible, responsibility for that lies with Swan himself. He had the chance to exploit a normally reflexively negative opposition's readiness to pursue financial regulation reform last year and preferred to ring-fence the banks from serious scrutiny. The big banks remain a protected species.
The government can't complain when they take advantage of that.
Mortgage, interest rate cuts war as serious as the Nullarbor Nymph
by Glenn Dyer
We are in a phony war with bank mortgage and interest rate cuts, which, if it was happening in a fortnight, would be on a par with the search for Big Foot, the Penrith Panther or the Nullarbor Nymph.
Yes, the big four  CBA, ANZ, Westpac and NAB  are sitting back and waiting for one of them to bolt from cover, so they others can get a lead on how much of the 0.25% rate cut to pass on. (Isnt that price signalling? You can bet that the ACCC is watching closely.)
The tip is that the NAB will break cover some time today with a rate cut of about 0.15 to 0.20% (it only passed on 0.20% of the 0.25% November 1 cut, remember). The NAB has been lending more than the others and has led the move to eliminate some of its income streams by getting rid of some fees and charges, so its finances are said to be the weakest.
The cupidity of the big four banks on the issue of rate cuts and rises has already been exposed on two fronts: two smaller banks, Bank of Queensland and ME (Members Equity) have already passed the cut on in full, even though they do face higher costs for raising funds locally (being smaller and carrying lower credit ratings than the big four.
And, what the media conveniently forgets is that big four banks all have past form.
Its not new news if they big four dont pass on all the 0.25% cut. For example, in April 2009 during the global financial crisis  three eventually passed on only 0.10% of the 0.25%, while one passed on nothing.
And remember how the big four boosted their mortgage rates by more than the 0.25% rise in November 2010? How quickly we all forget. A reminder: the CBA and ANZ lifted mortgage rates by 45 and 39 basis points, respectively follwoing the Melbourne Cup day rate rise in 2010. The NAB lifted its standard variable mortgage rate by 0.43% and Westpac by 0.35%.
So we know all banks are bastards. Its not a new story.
And there are a couple of other points to be made: the cuts wont have all that great an impact on mortgage holders because, as Crikey pointed out last month, well over half of them repay more than they have to each month, thereby building up equity at an even faster rate than they were doing a year ago. The banks get their money back faster and people will own their houses a bit quicker and newer mortgage holders will find the pressure easing, if they cut their repayments. But most wont.
And what about savers: they will get less for their term deposits as they rollover (thats called rollover risk at the big end of the market) and will get lower rates on their transaction accounts. For people on fixed incomes, its another blow, and yet you dont hear much about that and the media only covers mortgage holders (is that because many in the media have mortgages). The damage is greatest among older bank account holders and pensioners.
And you can bet that the banks will be quick to cut deposit rates, and slow to cut rates charged on credit cards and loans to business: all in the name of boosting whats called their net interest margin and improving their bottom lines.
Theres a large element of churlishness and let them eat cake from the big four if you look at recent history.
One of the real achievements of the GFC so far as Australia is concerned, is that we managed to save our banks the ignominy of reporting big losses or worse. Sure Bank West (owned by a crippled UK bank) and St George, were allowed to be taken over by the CBA and Westpac respectively (which hasnt done wonders for Westpacs earnings since 2008-09), but a combination of timely Reserve Bank action, the federal government loan guarantees and the financial claims mechanism convinced customers not to do what their counterparts had done to Northern Rock in the UK or countless UK banks, and stage a confidence-sapping run that forces a government bailout.
The federal government (thats us, the taxpayers), will earn more than $5 billion from the loan guarantee fee by the time this financial year is up and the Reserve Bank also made hundreds of millions of dollars from doing deals with the big banks in the final quarter of 2008 and early in 2009 to maintain liquidity levels in the financial system.
Despite that move, ordinary Australians and small and medium businesses (and no doubt some larger ones) quietly withdrew billions of dollars (over $10 billion by some estimates on top of normal needs) in the closing months of 2008 and early 2009. By June 30, 2009 the number of bank notes on issue was still up 14.3% from the year before, an indication of large the silent run had been. But that didnt cripple the banks because confidence was maintained as much of that cash was returned to the banks as 2009 went on.
That confidence was supported and nurtured by the federal government and the Reserve Bank, in other words, taxpayers supported the banks and the financial system and saved a lot of loss and anguish for everyone concerned.Three years on the world is facing another crisis, this time in Europe. It is nowhere near as dangerous as the sudden near collapse in 2008 that was sparked by the failure of Lehman Brothers and the US subprime crisis crunching banks, businesses and economies around the world in the space of two months. But it is a growing concern.
Banks throughout Europe have badly hurt this time around, but in the US, Australia, the banks are OK, except for a rise in short-term funding costs, which is normal as investors worry about the safety of the banks they are lending money to.
One of the key indicators to watch is the amount of money held in Exchange Settlement Accounts at the Reserve Bank by banks and other financial groups eligible to do so. If the amount starts rising, its a sign the banks are starting to worry about the safety of the financial system and lending to their peers, so they start leaving as much as they can with the RBA in these special accounts where it is safe.
In the 2008-09 crisis it soared to well over $16 billion on one day (December 22, 2008) as the RBA allowed banks to do so (and then siphoned off much of that into special term deposits).
This time around, theres been no change at all, the ESAs at the Reserve Bank have been at normal levels for months on end, theres just no sign of nerves among our banks and financial groups, unlike Europe.
At the same time our banks are healthier than they were in late 2008, much of the dodgy debts have gone, poor loans have been written down or expensed and the banks have raised tens of billions of dollars in new capital to strengthen their balance sheets. Thats why last weeks one-notch downgrade for the big four by Standard & Poors to AA minus was a storm in a teacup.
A senior RBA official pointed out in a speech last month that the banks have cut back their exposure to offshore funding since 2007 and lifted their harvesting of domestic deposits: In Australia, since mid-2007, deposits have grown at an annualised pace of 11%, compared with credit growth of 5%. As a result, while the level of wholesale issuance by Australian banks in 2011 is about the same as that in 2007, it is a significantly smaller share of total bank funding.
That has reduced their exposure to Europe, but with the US market still open, its nowhere near the problem of three years ago this month. The big four have cut the amount of offshore funding in the past year because of the strong rise of domestic deposits as the Australian savings rate has steadied around 10% to 10.5%. That has helped the banks maintain their interest margins, even though they started offering relatively high interest rates on deposits.
Those are falling, thanks to the fall in market yields as investors have factored in RBA rate cuts and foreign buyers have plunged into Australian government bonds and state government securities, attracted by our AAA rating and secure and steady financial system. But listen to the banks in recent weeks and their lobbyists and they are facing higher levels of danger and costs.
Given what happened three years ago, thats rubbish, but dont think that the current stand-off is something new. It isnt and we are going to see similar situations time and again.
It's fun, but can be 3ds throwing frustrating lol. Also my thumb is hurting from pressing on the a button too long
This is what I grabbed today. EBGames has the Xbox 360 S with 250Gb HDD, Kinect, Kinect Adventures and Carnival Games for $348. You also get $50 cashback from M$ so that brings it down to $298.
Decided to go for it since a HDD is $100 everywhere anyway. So in the end I pay $40 for a Kinect and 2 games.
Yeah I had the gf lined up to go to EB and get them to price match but when I rang to ask them they ended up telling me about this deal that was starting today and I had to spend the afternoon weighing up the options. I didn't really want a Kinect yet but it was the best decision in the long run since I will end up buying the damn thing anyway. Just means I need to re-arrange my tiny Study so the little guy can hug some sexy Double Fine gaming goodness. Which is also a great positive, I can buy another Double Fine game!Goddamnit! hahaha I bought one from harvey norman yesterday