CLASSIFICATION OF PUBLICATIONS, FILMS AND COMPUTER GAMES ACT - SECT 67
Demonstration of unclassified, RC and MA 15+ computer games
A person must not demonstrate a computer game so that it can be seen from a public place if the game is:
(a) classified RC or MA 15+; or
(b) unclassified but would, if classified, be classified RC or MA 15+.
Fault elements:
(a) intentionally demonstrating the game; and
(b) knowledge that, or recklessness as to whether, the game can be seen from a public place; and
(c) knowledge that, or recklessness as to whether, the game is classified RC or MA 15+ or unclassified.
a website is a public place, a screenshot is a picture from a prohibited game. So for example think of it like this.
Lets say a porn magazine is banned. You can't post pictures of that online. I know that print SHOULD be different but under the Act it is treated the same.
I get why this concerns you jintor, pcpp and all....
but given it was published before the decision then you should be ok. BUT there is also something in the act that prohibits the advertisement and printing of material related to games which are likely to receive an RC or MA15 rating
interesting, very interesting.
There's a story in this Someone needs to bust open the video game classifications story in a journalistic sense and do it well. There is a gold mine in the act for investigative journalism and lack of consistency.
in other news, the nsw act has not changed since 1984. It is ENTIRELY POSSIBLE the NSW act does not deal with video games @ all but the border customs act prevents imports.
Demonstration of unclassified, RC and MA 15+ computer games
A person must not demonstrate a computer game so that it can be seen from a public place if the game is:
(a) classified RC or MA 15+; or
(b) unclassified but would, if classified, be classified RC or MA 15+.
Fault elements:
(a) intentionally demonstrating the game; and
(b) knowledge that, or recklessness as to whether, the game can be seen from a public place; and
(c) knowledge that, or recklessness as to whether, the game is classified RC or MA 15+ or unclassified.
a website is a public place, a screenshot is a picture from a prohibited game. So for example think of it like this.
Lets say a porn magazine is banned. You can't post pictures of that online. I know that print SHOULD be different but under the Act it is treated the same.
I get why this concerns you jintor, pcpp and all....
but given it was published before the decision then you should be ok. BUT there is also something in the act that prohibits the advertisement and printing of material related to games which are likely to receive an RC or MA15 rating
interesting, very interesting.
There's a story in this Someone needs to bust open the video game classifications story in a journalistic sense and do it well. There is a gold mine in the act for investigative journalism and lack of consistency.
in other news, the nsw act has not changed since 1984. It is ENTIRELY POSSIBLE the NSW act does not deal with video games @ all but the border customs act prevents imports.