YuriLowell
Member
Have they done a whole lot of PC work before? I can't recall anything big they've worked on.
Did the PC version of the Bioshock 2 DLC's, PC Version of Divekick, and the PC version of Arkham Origins.
Have they done a whole lot of PC work before? I can't recall anything big they've worked on.
What comes first, news of a patch or the PR for how well this game sold?
So, seems like the legendary Denuvo DRM strikes again, destroying performance all over the place?
I mean the performance is still better than consoles, going above 30 fps and added effects.
Iron Galaxy.
The overall backlash from this is incredible.The comments on that article are.. something.
With Steam refunds being a thing, they better wait 14 days to bring out the smugness.It'll be both in the same PR statement.
"We're happy to announce Arkham Knight has already sold a billion copies worldwide in 24 hours! We're thrilled people are willingly to blindly put faith into Iron Galaxy's PC ports, and sends a great message to all AAA publishers in the future. Additionally, the season-pass is achieving record sales, showing there's a market for people to pay $40 for content they've only heard brief descriptions for.
Finally, we've heard the complaints about the PC version of Arhkam Knight. Something about a 30fps lock, stuttering like ass, something something Unreal Engine streaming, whatever. We'll have our interns look into that in the weeks and months to come. Right now, our core focus at Rocksteady is getting the season pass DLC skins and race tracks in order for release over the next six months!"
I bought a new PC with Arkham Knight in mind (Intel Core i7 4790K @ 4.4GHz / 16gigs of Ram / SSD drive / Titan X).
And it's not running well.
I tinkered with it, but it feels highly unstable and the frame dips get to me.
I could probably either wait for fixed or spend more time on getting the settings right, but I think I'm over that now.
Witcher 3 and GTA V run with well above stable 60 FPS with everything on max. settings.
I requested a refund on steam for the game and the season pass (Shame, Shame).
I'll be getting the PS4 version from Amazon tomorrow.
the thing is though, isn't it still running like junk even without the gameworks features on?
What the god damn hell is this nonsense? Just play it locked at 30FPS with Ultra settings and it's already better than the PS4 version. Are you fucking nuts?
You think people only had problems with the frame cap?The overall backlash from this is incredible.
I really don't see it as that big an issue. There's plenty of recently released AAA games with much larger issues. GTA V was literally unplayable by people with any special characters in their Windows 8.1 username for like a week.
This is a framerate cap that can be easily removed.
Like.
Really?
Did the PC version of the Bioshock 2 DLC's, PC Version of Divekick, and the PC version of Arkham Origins.
Some people are experiencing really bad Hitching , Crashes , Large drops/Unstable Framerate. For those people 30FPS on Consoles doesn't sound bad.
For me The game just runs like shit. I mean how can you drop 20 frames indoors in the same scene and 20 frames when using the Batmobile Afterburner.
Calm down, I revised my post. Just got back from work. Wasn't having any problems playing from early launch to actual launch. Came back to see the backlash. Assumed it was regarding the framerate cap because that's the issue people were discussing at the time.You think people only had problems with the frame cap?
Like.
Really?
What the god damn hell is this nonsense? Just play it locked at 30FPS with Ultra settings and it's already better than the PS4 version. Are you fucking nuts?
The comments on that article are.. something.
You know I considered myself to be one of those lucky people, my 770 handed the game fine.Calm down, I revised my post. Just got back from work. Wasn't having any problems playing from early launch to actual launch. Came back to see the backlash. Assumed it was regarding the framerate cap because that's the issue people were discussing at the time.
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/z66lJpsurJY/maxresdefault.jpg[img][/QUOTE]
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CIJ8oGwWsAAbuuq.jpg
Getting good performance on the in-game benchmark test.
Minimum: 55
Maximum 102
Average: 70
Everything on except NVIDIA Interactive Smoke and Fog.
I have a GTX 970, i5-3570K, 16GB RAM.
Lords of the Fallen stuttered like hell and had Denuvo. Also, you can twist words as much as you want but Denuvo is DRM.Älg;169494307 said:Has there ever been any evidence of Denuvo affecting performance negatively? Too me this just feels like more of a "muh DRM" situation, even though Denuvo isn't even DRM.
I'm really glad I don't care too much about framerate. I'm running everything maxed out (including gameworks stuff) at 1080 with the 30fps lock. Running on a i7-950 with 12 gigs of ram and a gtx970. Game runs fine for me. I'm quite happy so far. Haven't had any issues besides some minor stuttering in the first cut scene but gameplay seems smooth to me. No troubles with the batmobile yet.
Anyone else notice how much jaggies there are, along with terrible textures?
And this is why I have alway preferred console gaming!!
How? It hasn't been cracked for AK so you can't disable it.
And the way I understand it, previous "cracks" leave Denuvo running, they just try to fool it into thinking you have a legit copy.
Getting good performance on the in-game benchmark test.
Minimum: 55
Maximum 102
Average: 70
Everything on except NVIDIA Interactive Smoke and Fog.
I have a GTX 970, i5-3570K, 16GB RAM.
Calm down, I revised my post. Just got back from work. Wasn't having any problems playing from early launch to actual launch. Came back to see the backlash. Assumed it was regarding the framerate cap because that's the issue people were discussing at the time.
People are claiming that console versions run better, and I already posted on the last page with a GTX 970 sitting at 90fps.
Just word that they're trying to do something would be a good start.
The silence is getting annoying. It's like 1.30pm over here, Rocksteady know about the issues by now.
Anyone else notice how much jaggies there are, along with terrible textures?
Its not better than the ps4 version though. We need a comparison video to make it clear, but from what I'm seeing on YouTube videos the ps4 version seems to look better for some reason.
Shadow of Mordor and most previous WB published ports have been great.Oh shit, i forgot WB is publishing the Mad Max game too.
Hope that won't turn out a mediocre port, too.
What the god damn hell is this nonsense? Just play it locked at 30FPS with Ultra settings and it's already better than the PS4 version. Are you fucking nuts?
Rocksteady butchered the PC version, I haven't hit launch yet, but there is no excuse as to why the PS4 version should run better than a 970 and above equipped PC. I was looking forward to this too.
People are so quick to complain and say "so glad there's refunds" when a patch is probably on the way but they'd rather make a negative review which they probably wont correct when these issues are fixed.
I really hate the 'I told you so' mentality of some people, not here on gaf but on other forums where they're all circle jerking over how you should never pre-order and now that this happened with Arkham Knight they're all so wise and knew without a shadow of a doubt that this would happen but of course had this not happened they would have known that too.
My game is very much playable, right now the stuttering is minimal and if I could only disable motion blur I think it would be even smoother.
Are we SURE about this? I heard they just did some Steam integration work and that the port was done in house at Rocksteady?
it doesnt.
the PS4 version is 30 fps with less effects than the pc version as usual. how on earth the ps4 version runs better ?
what people are pissed off here is problems when u unlock the fps to more than 30 fps. thats when shit hits the fans.
Also, sooner or later an update will come to the pc version along with updated drivers. and the pc version as always will always come on top.
And the 30fps cap is the culprit.
Unlock the 30fps in the ini and lock it with an external program.The locked 30 FPS somehow make the frames drop below 30 FPS. I'm not sure how I can circumvent this issue, even by reducing other settings.
i have a geforce gtx 860m? is it supposed to play this or??
Oh shit, i forgot WB is publishing the Mad Max game too.
Hope that won't turn out a mediocre port, too.
The locked 30 FPS somehow make the frames drop below 30 FPS. I'm not sure how I can circumvent this issue, even by reducing other settings.