Maintenance
Member
I really don't think this will change the box office numbers though...
I'm not even a fan of the movie but I can see it making a lot of money.
I'm not even a fan of the movie but I can see it making a lot of money.
Ew what? It hasn't even been remotely that high for two fucking years.
One bad movie isn't going to kill superhero movies. Especially one bad DC movie, given Marvel are shooting out several commercially successful movies a year.I hope this marks the decline of this genre. It's so overdone and tired. I hope the public has had enough.
Happy with the reviews.
Boy, looks like I might have way overshot my prediction. Lol.![]()
I wouldn't call myself a fan of Snyder, but that's just because I've only seen Man of Steel of his films. That one's flawed but enjoyable, and I'm expecting the same out of BvS. TBH, I know it's lame to attack the critics, but they've always been hating on Snyder, even on his movies most consider to be of high quality. I'll wait to see it for myself.
That said, I screenshotted the RT score when it was at 0% because it was too funny to me.
I really don't think this will change the box office numbers though...
Your answer:
100% True and worst of all is it's never explained or given context, he just does it and we sit back and have to say "ok then..."
I really don't think this will change the box office numbers though...
I'm not even a fan of the movie but I can see it making a lot of money.
MAJOR SPOILERSits the warehouse sequence where he kills someone by lighting them on fire
46% RT (65% user)
51 MC
I really don't think this will change the box office numbers though...
I'm not even a fan of the movie but I can see it making a lot of money.
Only one man can save the DCCU now
![]()
ApparentlyHe takes out a whole warehouse of goons. Batman is a killer now.
Fuck this man, seriously, who thought that was a good idea? Who approved that part of the script?
Your answer:
100% True and worst of all is it's never explained or given context, he just does it and we sit back and have to say "ok then..."
I hope this marks the decline of this genre. It's so overdone and tired. I hope the public has had enough.
Happy with the reviews.
I'm trying to not be in denial and I have no idea if I'm succeeding.
At this point I'm just glad Dick Snyder didn't decide to drag the Arrowverse down with him.
Because it completely shatters his character. His no-killing rule isn't just some moral code, it's a symptom of the psychological trauma that made him the Batman. If you take that away then he's just the fucking Punisher. Batman being a murderer is also a major negative I had for the '89 Batman film.
Fuck, that will never not look terrible.
Maybe his movies just aren't that good and he's not that good of a storyteller?
When a guy's been making movies for over a decade and they've all received mixed to negative reviews, maybe the issue is with the director and not everyone else.
I hope this marks the decline of this genre. It's so overdone and tired. I hope the public has had enough.
Happy with the reviews.
Again, this is the batman from The Dark Knight Returns. That bats was a ruthless mofo that played it fast and loose with the One Rule.To be fair I don't think it's a big shock that this Batman is seasoned and has lost a lot. does he say something like "20 years doing this, How many good people are left?"
I mean it can be said batman is a bit unhinged at this point.
Yikes. Sounds like Snyder/the script just completely flubbed the characters and the second-half narrative/structure.
And you're happy a movie is bad....why exactly?
In DKRhe only paralyses the Joker, who then proceeds to kill himself. The tank fires - and I quote - "rubber bullets. Honest." Though there is a moment where Batman uses a machine gun on a thug which looks like a pretty obvious murder.
Maybe you can go into the movie pretending Snyder was given a different movie, LOL.I'm trying to not be in denial and I have no idea if I'm succeeding.
I hope this marks the decline of this genre. It's so overdone and tired. I hope the public has had enough.
Happy with the reviews.
The first act is a bit ponderous and very very very disjointed. It somehow feels overlong and yet like it's missing a string of connecting scenes. It's kind of all over the place.
I thought the 2nd act was pretty good, and the 3rd act was your standard comic book movie 3rd act.
There's a bunch of scenes and fights which people will lose their minds over, but honestly there's not that much coherent framework holding them together. Unfortunately part of the conceit means that both Superman and Batman are fundamentally as dumb as a bag of rocks for much of the movie.
if the movies so bad why don't you all do better... snyder for life...
I don't have an issue with Batman killing in situations that call for it. The Nolan movies atleast presented some justified scenarios (last second saving a kid, war-time chaos in the streets). But he shouldn't be indiscriminately killing dudes in situations where he doesn't have to, let alone low-level thugs. Even angry post-Jason Todd brutal Batman should have a bit more nuance.
To be fair I don't think it's a big shock that this Batman is seasoned and has lost a lot. does he say something like "20 years doing this, How many good people are left?"
I mean it can be said batman is a bit unhinged at this point.
Can someone photoshop sad Batfleck looking at the RT score?
From the Newsarama review:
'More in the tradition of an old school Hollywood biblical epic than modern-day superhero movie, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice tries to be grand and important in its every frame, and for the most part, Snyder and screenwriter Chris Terrio deliver on their very lofty ambitions, crafting a wholly unique comic book movie experience, which in todays increasingly-crowded superhero marketplace, is not an insignificant achievement.'