except you're probably more Northern as per the stereotype than any of us
yes even Ninj
Depends what you like, but the quayside is quite pretty if you fancy a walk, the Hancock Museum is worth a look, or the Laing Art Gallery if that kind of thing floats your boat. I dunno man, there is all kinds to do but it's hard to narrow it down without context.Oy Britgaf, help me out:
I will be spending 10 days in the UK soon. In autumn (d'oh). Mostly in Newcastle (d'oh x2)
Anyhow, I'll arrive in Edinburgh and then make my way down.
1) What's the most scenic way to travel from Edinburgh to Newcastle? Take the train? Is there a coastal line?
2) What do I absolutely have to check out in Edinburgh? I'm a boring tourist, I like nice views, pretty cities, walking around and good beer.
3) How would I best spend a week in the Newcastle area? Any worthwhile day trips? Any must sees in Newcastle?
Thanks in advance!
Toddla T was DJing at Mint Lounge last night, it was Ballin' so hip-hop, jungle and drum and bass. He was well good, and played this that I haven't heard in ages:The Northeners will be up around midday to answer your questions Milchjon. They're sleeping off a hard night of being Northern at the moment.
I'm listening to Boy in Da Corner and realising it's still a great album so I'm no use to you.
except you're probably more Northern as per the stereotype than any of us
yes even Ninj
Toddla T was DJing at Mint Lounge last night, it was Ballin' so hip-hop, jungle and drum and bass. He was well good, and played this that I haven't heard in ages:
UNKLE - Guns Blazing (Drums of Death Part 1)
Holy fuckballs, I nearly did a backflip when I heard those drums booming out of the sound system. Such a fucking tune!
Isn't the Steam version of IV the dogshit DS version (pc-ified)?
2) What do I absolutely have to check out in Edinburgh?
Haha, small world! I hadn't heard it for a while, and it was just such a weird tune to hear in a club, I just wasn't expecting it. The vocal delivery on Guns Blazing is ridiculous, he enunciates with such anger and conviction:Dude, that's fucking weird. I fired up Psyence Fiction last night and listened to Guns Blazing, Nursery Rhyme and, best of all, Celestial Annihalation. So good.
Head to Edinburgh Waverley Station
Take the next 30 minute train to Glasgow
Enjoy
Serious answer: it's a shame you came now as Edinburgh had the Fringe festival last month and it was pretty cool. But anyway, might as well check out Edinburgh Castle, Scott's Monument, Arther's Seat if you're into hiking/hillwalking. Princes Street if you're into shopping. Royal Mile for the interesting cobbled roads and tourist trap stores. St Andrews square for old architecture and monuments. Lothian Road has the Cameo Cinema. Great, lovely indie cinema that is not far from where Sean Connery was born and Tarantino was there when Pulp Fiction was released. Lothian Road also has some nice bars and restaurants. So does George Street but it's probably a bit pricey considering it's close proximity to Princes Street.
Just go to Glasgow..
Depends what you like, but the quayside is quite pretty if you fancy a walk, the Hancock Museum is worth a look, or the Laing Art Gallery if that kind of thing floats your boat. I dunno man, there is all kinds to do but it's hard to narrow it down without context.
Night out wise: The Head of Steam, Trillians, Pitcher and Piano, Revolution, Victoria 22, Bijoux and The Mushroom are all pretty good. The Mushroom has the longest bar I've ever seen!
My band got stung with a £250 Low Emission Zone charge for going to london, wtfffffff. That's fucking robbery when we never even knew what that was to begin with. Utter cunts.
Didn't want to say on Facebook cos I know Johnny can get a bit touchy but there are lots of signs letting you know well before you enter the low emission zone
This is true, but how are you supposed to even know what they mean? "This is a low emission zone", ok what does that mean? "Too late, you're in it now, £250 please"
Is really fucked up considering all the people who go to london once in a blue moon and would have no real reason to even know it was a thing until it's too late.
£250 (or £500 and then £1000) is an insane amount of money for such a minor infraction as well.
Eh, probably can't come to the meet next week now because of this, that's my spending money for October gone before I even got paid
Most people probably don't go to London in a van though. If you don't know what it is you should check first as soon as you see the sign.
Don't get me wrong it's really shitty and I feel bad for you, and if it means you can't come to the meet well then that blows. But you can't use the didn't know what it was as an excuse, because you could have easily looked it up to check but chose not to.
I think it's a good thing because it means that classic and vintage car rallies can now start and end somewhere that isn't London.Every road entering London has them on way before the zone, and you will always have the option to turn off before you enter it.
It's not a way to make money or a pointless scheme, it's to reduce pollution in London by not allowing old, filth spewing larger vehicles in. I think it's a good thing.
Wow, really?Every road entering London has them on way before the zone, and you will always have the option to turn off before you enter it.
It's not a way to make money or a pointless scheme, it's to reduce pollution in London by not allowing old, filth spewing larger vehicles in. I think it's a good thing.
I think it's a good thing because it means that classic and vintage car rallies can now start and end somewhere that isn't London.
I do feel bad for owners of classic cars that have to live down there though.
Wow, really?
I agree that it has positive side effects, but let's be honest, financial gain is the primary concern. They're just playing off the fact that they can put a nice little green bow on yet another tax.
Every road entering London has them on way before the zone, and you will always have the option to turn off before you enter it.
It's not a way to make money or a pointless scheme, it's to reduce pollution in London by not allowing old, filth spewing larger vehicles in. I think it's a good thing.
It's the ULEZ bollocks that's threatening classics. No more London to Brighton if that takes holdI'm pretty sure cars are still excluded at the mo.
I'm agreeing with you that it's a good thing for the environment but anyone saying that making money isn't the main reason for taxation is deluded.Financial gain was not the primary reason for introducing the low emission zone. If it was there would be far easier ways to make more money from road users entering London. It was introduced to encourage the most heavily polluting larger vehicles to become greener.
People bang on about climate change and how the government aren't doing enough to combat it, but when they do do something people moan because it has an adverse affect on them! Can't win.
Just seems like another excuse for people to slag off London to me.
I'm agreeing with you that it's a good thing for the environment but anyone saying that making money isn't the main reason for taxation is deluded.
It's not a tax though, it's a fine
Semantics.It's not a tax though, it's a fine
It's not fine, it's shit!
ba dum tish
If it wasn't about money then the fees wouldn't be on a sliding scale from £250-1000. Charge us a £100 and we'll say "lesson learned", charge £250 and we're a bit shocked. We're lucky there's three of us to split the costs, I don't know how most people can find a spare £250 in a given month, it's literal highway robbery.
This isn't even slagging london off either, it's bewilderment at an overzealous punishment.
It's the ULEZ bollocks that's threatening classics. No more London to Brighton if that takes hold
It's not fine, it's shit!
ba dum tish
Semantics.
Neither, I'm suggesting that in the context of the current discussion, whether or not their primary reason to exist is to raise money, the distinction between the two is a semantic argument.Are you disputing the meaning of 'tax' or 'fine', or are you saying they're the same thing?
Neither, I'm suggesting that in the context of the current discussion, whether or not their primary reason to exist is to raise money, the distinction between the two is a semantic argument.
Neither, I'm suggesting that in the context of the current discussion, whether or not their primary reason to exist is to raise money, the distinction between the two is a semantic argument.
Wow someone is on the warpath this afternoon. This and no independence for Scotland...
It's the best version of IV, yes.
My brother claims Newcastle is exactly like shown on Geordie Shore.
Semantics don't just relate to language though, there are logical semantics relating to implication, supposition, etc too.Can't see how it is when there is no dispute of their meaning and their meanings are quite clear and not the same thing
Haha, I just use whatever words come into my head. I'm not trying to be a smart arse, just clear and concise innit.You can tell Ninj is getting ready for an internet fight because he used both the words "context" AND "semantics", that's the online equivalent of taking your coat off and throwing it on the floor
And the occasional short, handsome bald man.No lie, if you're out after midnight you will see A LOT of girls falling over.
I'm just saying responding to the argument:
"Taxes are mainly there to get money out of you"
With:
"It's a fine though"
Exactly. And put a roof on it too, seal it up nice and tight, just to be safe. Definitely no sneaky emissions getting in after that.CHEEZMO;130754678 said:I've been saying for years we should build a wall around London.
Exactly. And put a roof on it too, seal it up nice and tight, just to be safe. Definitely no sneaky emissions getting in after that.
Well I happen to think that's the case with the LEZ too, it just so happens that they have cuddly, socially acceptable environmental concerns in which to frame it.I think this is where wires are crossed. The argument was not
"Taxes are mainly there to get money out of you"
If that was the argument I would have totally agreed with you.
The argument was whether the LEZ was mainly there to get money out of you.
CHEEZMO;130754678 said:I've been saying for years we should build a wall around London.
Exactly. And put a roof on it too, seal it up nice and tight, just to be safe. Definitely no sneaky emissions getting in after that.
Haha, nothing like a dose of levity to clear the air.Would be like a dutch oven of death. I like this idea.
Well I happen to think that's the case with the LEZ too, it just so happens that they have cuddly, socially acceptable environmental concerns in which to frame it.
But you know, opinions and stuff.