Dreams-Visions
Member
worked for me about 10 minutes ago. maybe he should try it and see.Aaron said:It's a steamworks game, so yes, but the pax coupon has expired.
worked for me about 10 minutes ago. maybe he should try it and see.Aaron said:It's a steamworks game, so yes, but the pax coupon has expired.
Just did, it worked. Yay I guess! (There goes my games budget for the rest of the year )Dreams-Visions said:worked for me about 10 minutes ago. maybe he should try it and see.
Guardian Bob said:Anyone know how I get the soundtrack from steam? Never got a Steam game with a soundtrack before.
Aaron said:Pretty sure they don't own the rights to the name, so pretty implausible yeah.
Technosteve said:I want my alpha centauri on this CIV
xbhaskarx said:I hope they make Alpha Centauri 2 next.
xbhaskarx said:Damn.
Well whoever owns the rights to Alpha Centauri needs to hurry up and make another Alpha Centauri.
EvilDick34 said:Guys, im not an RTS kinda guy, especially a turn based RTS but damn if this game doesn't have me wanting to try, any suggestions? Should i buy CIV IV first and see how i like it or should i just plunk down the 50 bux? Is CIV IV harder to player than 5 will be?
Aaron said:There's no such thing as a turn-based RTS. Same as saying third person FPS.
The MAJOR change in Civ V is in the combat, so if that's what you're into, Civ 4 isn't going to leave you with the right impression. They're night and day in this regard.
EvilDick34 said:I don't get it? Wanna help me out instead of some gif?
Vagabundo said:Real-Time-Strategy.
Turn-based-RTS is an Oxymoron.
EvilDick34 said:I see, so..again i'm a noob to anything like this kind of game outside of Majesty, etc., so if you guys could be not so harsh or what not, it would be nice. Why am i reading stuff that calls it turn based RTS or whatever. If it is not that, then what?
Shambles said:TBS = Civ 4
RTS = Starcraft
Welcome to the school of the real world.
EvilDick34 said:I see, so..again i'm a noob to anything like this kind of game outside of Majesty, etc., so if you guys could be not so harsh or what not, it would be nice. Why am i reading stuff that calls it turn based RTS or whatever. If it is not that, then what?
EvilDick34 said:I see, so..again i'm a noob to anything like this kind of game outside of Majesty, etc., so if you guys could be not so harsh or what not, it would be nice. Why am i reading stuff that calls it turn based RTS or whatever. If it is not that, then what?
Brashnir said:Here's a little bit of free advice, for GAF, the internet, and your entire life.
When you say something incorrect - and then someone corrects you - They are not being harsh. They are helping you.
Acting like people are somehow jerks because they know what they're talking about makes you look like a petulant little shit.
EvilDick34 said:Again, what is with the cheap shots? I come in wanting to get into this and you guys make me not want to try after all, seriously...it is a game, R E L A X.
don't even get me started on metroid other mAaron said:There's no such thing as a turn-based RTS. Same as saying third person FPS.
Check out some of the GB videos: http://www.giantbomb.com/sid-meiers-civilization-v/61-30057/ (Both the history of Civ and the 13 minutes of Civ V videos give a good idea of what to expect I think).EvilDick34 said:Guys, im not an RTS kinda guy, especially a turn based RTS but damn if this game doesn't have me wanting to try, any suggestions? Should i buy CIV IV first and see how i like it or should i just plunk down the 50 bux? Is CIV IV harder to player than 5 will be?
No45 said:Check out some of the GB videos: http://www.giantbomb.com/sid-meiers-civilization-v/61-30057/.
I've never played a game like this, but they don't look too bad (Helped of course that you have all the time in the world to take your turn... in single player at least). Tempted to try this myself.
EvilDick34 said:Again, what is with the cheap shots? I come in wanting to get into this and you guys make me not want to try after all, seriously...it is a game, R E L A X.
EvilDick34 said:Guys, im not an RTS kinda guy, especially a turn based RTS
Sinatar said:
EvilDick34 said:Again, what is with the cheap shots? I come in wanting to get into this and you guys make me not want to try after all, seriously...it is a game, R E L A X.
EvilDick34 said:Guys, im not an RTS kinda guy, especially a turn based RTS but damn if this game doesn't have me wanting to try, any suggestions? Should i buy CIV IV first and see how i like it or should i just plunk down the 50 bux? Is CIV IV harder to player than 5 will be?
the guy has been nothing but reasonable, stop being a dickxbhaskarx said:1. Don't be so defensive.
2. Not wanting to try a game because some random strangers on the internet who have no connection to the game laughed at your humorous mistake is a bit silly.
Rez said:the guy has been nothing but reasonable, stop being a dick
Aaron said:Pretty sure they don't own the rights to the name, so pretty implausible yeah.
bakeray said:Demo goes up at 10AM EST
Dina said:Why release it 3 days later in eu, damn it. Shit is cruel.
pix said:I will have 30 minutes to try this game out when im on lunch.
Then I have to wait until after work.
bakeray said:Demo goes up at 10AM EST
The Good
- The revamped interface allows both new and old players to spend less time figuring out how to manage their empire and more time getting stuff done
- Fewer, more robust units make per-turn unit management quicker
- The changes implemented in the combat system present interesting new challenges and advantages to both offense and defense
- City-states are a great addition to the game in terms of resources, combat, and diplomacy. For Civ4 vets, they are vassals writ large
- The graphics are very pretty and not terribly demanding on the system; the settings have a good deal of flexibility
- The "quests" lend some micro-structure to the game, something to do between wars or when no one likes you enough to trade
- I have not yet seen them, but I've heard that in the modern era you can build Tiny Death Robots
- It's still addictive as hell, and sweeps you into the action immediately, every time, without overwhelming you
The Bad
- The AI has been reworked, but diplomatic relations with them occasionally have an overtone of "if you don't know what's wrong, I'm not going to tell you"
- Some parts are a little goofy. I had no problem with the lists when they were "The Happiest Civilizations," as opposed to now, where it's "People that Smile the Most"
- Social policies and culture are almost forgettable if you're more into domination/conquest/diplomatic victories
- No technology trading, which was marginally more realistic than a "research agreement," at least in the BC years, and less expensive
- Alerts can stack up and it can be tiresome to dismiss a huge pile of them just make sure you've dealt with them all
The Ugly
- Hardcore fans may not agree with some of the editing choices made in the streamlining of the game, and may feel that victory doesn't require exactly the same grueling tenacity
- The purchasing aspects of the game (units, buildings, tiles, influence, research agreements) may come to feel like or be perceived as cheesy strategy, especially in multiplayer games, since you mostly just have to know how to generate money
Verdict: Buy
I have not yet seen them, but I've heard that in the modern era you can build Tiny Death Robots
Mengy said:So it's past 9 AM, is anyone playing yet? I'm stuck at work until 4:30.