GAME have always been good to me and games usually come the day before. Just checked my email and it looks like GAME may be sending out their copies tomorrow.Wes said:UK GAF:
Where's the best place to order from to get it release day? Play? Game? Amazon?
Better way:dream said:Alt-tabbing out and then spamming mouse clicks in the Civ 5 window seemed to work for me.
Pretty poor form though.
Brewster's Wallet said:I suppose one small silver lining that UK Gaffers won't be able to access it until Friday is that hopefully the first day of crap gets resolved before we are allowed in
At its absolute smartest (what the game calls its 'normal' difficulty setting, before the AI starts receiving stat bonuses) the AI still makes inexplicable demands from you. It will refuse your demands, even if you've got an apocalyptic horde parked outside its borders. It will go to war with you, dash a dozen armies against your defences, then offer you everything it's got for a peace settlement. These aren't opponents that make for fond memories. Civ V is occasionally capable of clashes between equally-matched nations, but they're unforgivably rare. If you want respectable competition, you need to head online.
This is the reason I spent that week actively wrestling with my burning desire to click on the Civ V icon, despite it being such an astoundingly slick, engaging game. For all the hours it eats up, outside of its multiplayer it gives disappointingly little back, and it will continue to give very little back until Firaxis bites the bullet and admits that there are aspects of Civilization which deserve not just to be improved, but fixed.
It's a real shame that there's already a game called Civilization Revolution, because while that console title was a brave attempt at something a little different for the franchise, it's this game that really, well, revolutionises the series.
With so many changes, tweaks, cuts and additions, it could all have gone so horribly wrong. Make too many changes and you infuriate one of the largest and most devout fanbases in all of gaming. Make too few changes and you risk releasing a game that's accused of being stale. Frumpy. Old-fashioned.
But it didn't, and we're thankfully left with a game that keeps the spirit of Civilization alive with one hand, while with the other, it casts aside twenty years of mechanical dead weight in favour of a faster, cleaner and more enjoyable game.
What are your system specs? When's the last time you updated your video drivers? Are you playing in DX9 or DX10/11?Willy105 said:I am not liking this demo.
It's full of bugs. I skip the opening video, but the game crashes later because the video is still going on behind the scenes!
What's more, the performance is terrible. The video chugs along at a frame per every 2 seconds, the loading times are horrendous, and I have to play in Strategic Mode to get anything done.
And that should not be happening since I can play Portal at full settings at 60 fps (at SD resolution).
I'm going to download the Civ 4 demo to see if I should choose that one instead (my last game was Civ 3).
Willy105 said:I am not liking this demo.
It's full of bugs. I skip the opening video, but the game crashes later because the video is still going on behind the scenes!
What's more, the performance is terrible. The video chugs along at a frame per every 2 seconds, the loading times are horrendous, and I have to play in Strategic Mode to get anything done.
And that should not be happening since I can play Portal at full settings at 60 fps (at SD resolution).
I'm going to download the Civ 4 demo to see if I should choose that one instead (my last game was Civ 3).
Just to get this out there, Portal was not a very demanding game at all. That's not to say that you're rig shouldn't be able to play Civ V (as I have no idea what you're specs are and am not the most technically knowledgeable about PC hardware anyway), but saying "I can play Portal -- a game that wasn't technically impressive when it came out three years ago -- I should be able to play a game that came out today" doesn't really hold water.Willy105 said:And that should not be happening since I can play Portal at full settings at 60 fps (at SD resolution).
So conditioned to this from Civ IV already. :lolAt its absolute smartest (what the game calls its 'normal' difficulty setting, before the AI starts receiving stat bonuses) the AI still makes inexplicable demands from you. It will refuse your demands, even if you've got an apocalyptic horde parked outside its borders.
pix said:Umm... you know how old the source engine is compared to Civ 5?...
Post your system specs.
Steve Youngblood said:Just to get this out there, Portal was not a very demanding game at all. That's not to say that you're rig shouldn't be able to play Civ V (as I have no idea what you're specs are and am not the most technically knowledgeable about PC hardware anyway), but saying "I can play Portal -- a game that wasn't technically impressive when it came out three years ago -- I should be able to play a game that came out today" doesn't really hold water.
Willy105 said:1.6 GHz AMD Anthlon 64 processor TF-20, ATI Radeon HD3200, 3 GB Memory
Alright. I could never get used to the speed at which specs for games increased.
yeah welcome to pc gaming. one year a rig is the hottest shit out there and then ten years later....Willy105 said:Alright. I could never get used to the speed at which specs for games increased.
Yeah that hardware is just not going to cut it. Keep in kind Portal runs on a 6 year old engine.Willy105 said:1.6 GHz AMD Anthlon 64 processor TF-20, ATI Radeon HD3200, 3 GB Memory
Alright. I could never get used to the speed at which specs for games increased.
pix said:Not being mean, but is this a troll post? I'd say you are under the minimum specs and I don't even know what they are...
AstroLad said:yeah welcome to pc gaming. one year a rig is the hottest shit out there and then ten years later....
Willy105 said:
Willy105 said:1.6 GHz AMD Anthlon 64 processor TF-20, ATI Radeon HD3200, 3 GB Memory
Alright. I could never get used to the speed at which specs for games increased.
AstroLad said:So conditioned to this from Civ IV already. :lol
Still going to learn through a handful of single-player games then head online as soon as practicable. Someone should make an online thread + Steam group probably so people can find matches.
Dreams-Visions said:first Civ game. omfg so much to process in my head.
all the info bubbles are giving me a headache.
The way I've done it is you play a few hours, save, then come back and play a few more. Usually takes 2-3 sessions for 2P, I'm sure longer for more, but you can also just set a faster speed. Never played with randoms. I don't imagine that would be particularly fun though.Minsc said:Do people finish Civ games online? I'm guessing you play at your leisure turn by turn like Carcassonne? Must take months!
That's if you play via Pitboss or PBEM, which will be patched in later (the playing for months thing). At release we only have standard online options, so you have to be connected the whole time. So you'd either need to have a lot of free time or cap the turns if you want to play through in one session. Otherwise, save and resume at a later time.Minsc said:Do people finish Civ games online? I'm guessing you play at your leisure turn by turn like Carcassonne? Must take months!
Spire said:Jesus christ. I'm not even sure Civ IV would run that well on your rig.
The way I do it is just play a few hours on a Saturday afternoon. Maybe a few hours on Sunday. Then finish up the next weekend. Really not that tough and I'd rather be spending those hours playing with friends & family if I'd be playing AI anyway. No idea how any of the other modes work as I've never done them.XiaNaphryz said:That's if you play via Pitboss or PBEM, which will be patched in later. At release we only have standard online options, so you have to be connected the whole time. So you'd either need to have a lot of free time or cap the turns if you want to play through in one session. Otherwise, save and resume at a later time.
Here's how Pitboss worked for Civ IV:AstroLad said:No idea how any of the other modes work as I've never done them.
The Pit Boss persistent turn-based server will allow for players to play as long as they like and leave when they like without disrupting the game. Players can also fill in for AI players and join when they like (so it is possible to jump in right in the middle of a game and take an AI's role). The server will download the current game state, then a player takes their turn and the server afterwards saves for the next player. It is like playing a streamlined version of play by e-mail or hot seat multiplayer.
MrCompletely said:a little concerned about the AI, multiple reviews are criticizing the aggressiveness and senselessness of it, but Rock Paper Shotgun is the only review I've read that can be construed as negative. Still can't wait to get home and sink in!
Did you try running it in XP compatibility mode?Willy105 said:Civ IV doesn't work for me either. Not compatible with Windows 7.
Sucks.
Willy105 said:Civ IV doesn't work for me either. Not compatible with Windows 7.
Sucks.
XiaNaphryz said:Did you try running it in XP compatibility mode?
Willy105 said:I just have the vanilla Home Premium version. No dice for me.
Guess I'll stick with Civ 3!
I've been playing Civ IV on Win7 since Win7 came out.Willy105 said:Civ IV doesn't work for me either. Not compatible with Windows 7.
Sucks.