Under Nadella, Microsoft actually plays ball with the unions, and so in Corporate America's staunch anti-Union landscape, Microsoft gets itself some unusual allies. We saw a lot of... odd endorsements during the ABK circus for exactly that reason. Sony, at least in the US, is the same as every other US corporation: it union busts at every opportunity.The idea is that shuttering jobs makes those remaining less likely to unionize. That’s their explanation at least.
The use of “monopoly” is dumb here either way.
Their support of MS is ironic though all things considered, but I guess all they care about is Activision QA unionizing.
And all they care about is the US obviously.
Legal stuff about monopolies is such a weird combo of making sense and not making sense.Under Nadella, Microsoft actually plays ball with the unions, and so in Corporate America's staunch anti-Union landscape, Microsoft gets itself some unusual allies. We saw a lot of... odd endorsements during the ABK circus for exactly that reason. Sony, at least in the US, is the same as every other US corporation: it union busts at every opportunity.
As for their monopoly, whether intentional or not, it's an accusation Sony's going to have to contend with moving forward. Sony's dominant position in the console space has driven out both Nintendo and Microsoft. Whether Sony wanted to do it or not is largely irrelevant to fact that that is what's happened. Once Microsoft's finished doing... whatever it's doing, Sony will find itself in a monopoly position in the high-end console landscape. It'll have basically full control over that entire section of industry, and thus have the power to negotiate whatever deals it wants with publishers and developers. And then it'll be just like Apple: every other dog will be lining up to sue and level accusation against them like the CWA.
Clown shit from the CWA. What kind of big brains logic gets you from a failed studio closure to a "molopsony" .
Because people are typically entitled and think any company they work for should be pressured to keep them employed no matter what.The company lost more than 400$ million, what are the expectations? bleed more money for these useless talentless freaks fucks?
Are these people retards or something? it's not logical to even try and open your mouth after this huge loss unless you are one of those woke ugly mfers that got offended another woke got fired. There is no other explanation.
Wait is this one of those European socialist groups who demands everyone to never fail even if they are shit at the job? (well except when big daddy Microsoft gives them a handy, and by that I mean payout).Which way is the wind blowing today CWA?
My Tax money at work ladies and Gents.
Probably the only time you'll ever see in life a story saying shutting down a poor performing company/department (game studio in this case) which had an atrocious product, cost a ton to make, and was so bad it even lead to blanket refunds two weeks later being spun into a monopoly narrative.So ending own studios equal monopoly and buying full third party publishers equal fair competition? ...
We really are in the upsidedown world
The company lost more than 400$ million, what are the expectations? bleed more money for these useless talentless freaks fucks?
Are these people retards or something? it's not logical to even try and open your mouth after this huge loss unless you are one of those woke ugly mfers that got offended another woke got fired. There is no other explanation.
This isn't the first time the CWA has taken a major platform holder to task. Back in May, the union asked Microsoft for more "respect and compassion" following a huge round of layoffs and studio closures. When the Xbox maker then proceeded to cut even more jobs, the CWA again expressed its disappointment.
The CWA was a vocal advocate of Microsoft's colossal merger with Activision Blizzard. Despite initially protesting the move, the union eventually threw its weight behind the deal after signing a labor neutrality agreement with Microsoft and Activision Blizzard to enable workers to freely unionize.
The deal was hailed as a major win for the CWA, but the Activision Blizzard merger has now resulted in thousands of layoffs as Microsoft works to implement a "sustainable cost structure" after spending $68.7 billion to purchase the Call of Duty maker.
Painfully transparent, this corruption is.
No, they think we are.Are they stupid?
No, they think we are.
Generally pro-union, but this is an odd take.
I'm all for labour organizing, and collectively bargaining for better pay, work conditions, etc.
But shit like this is what makes it harder to have these conversations.
No, they think we are.
Europe is full of clowns, would not recommend that.Time for Sony to leave all this clown shit behind and move everything back to Japan and Europe.
I'm confused... so to get a stronger hold they kill studios? What kind of thinking is that?
If you ain’t cheating, you ain’t trying."The CWA was a vocal advocate of Microsoft's colossal merger with Activision Blizzard. "
Yeah....they were bought. CWA brought up Sony when Microsoft laid off workers as well.
"Microsoft’s decision to lay off 650 video game workers is an extremely disappointing move from one of the world’s largest and most profitable corporations. This news comes just after Sony Interactive Entertainment subsidiary Bungie announced 220 layoffs in late July. While none of those who are losing their jobs are represented by CWA, we understand how devastating layoffs are to the workers and their families."
Statement from CWA Following Layoffs at Microsoft Gaming
Microsoft’s decision to lay off 650 video game workers is an extremely disappointing move from one of the world’s largest and most profitable corporations.cwa-union.org
The CWA claims Sony has dissolved some studios to avoid competing in select markets and secure a 'monopoly position.
MS is now the largest 3rd party publisher (and largest enterprise/IT company) in the world, owns the biggest IP in the world (CoD) that can foreclose any time on a first party venture since they do have a first party console.Monopoly? Do these guys forget Nintendo exists? Its rich talking about a monopoly when MS is losing at one thing. lol.
Ya.It doesn't make any sense. The only think I can think of, is they're trying to say Sony are limiting competition by purchasing and closing a mobile game dev, therefore preventing other companies from buying them. So by reducing the number of mobile game devs in the market, Sony are trying to have a monopoly by.....secretly planning to put all their SIE games on mobile?
Never mind there are like thousands of other mobile devs and 99% of them with a lot more mobile market cache and net worth/value than Neon Koi. Never mind that a lot of SIE's teams seem to be taking their sweet time releasing new games for the PS5 itself, let alone some fantasy nightmare of optimizing downports for some Consumer Cellular smartphone.
TL;DR: I just want the CWA to STFU.
If MS bought soda companies, then this would be the argument.Coca-Cola to stop making some of their products. This will give them a monopoly over their competition.
Don't ask how.
But many people here consider Sony the market leader and disregard Nintendo entirelyMonopoly? Do these guys forget Nintendo exists? Its rich talking about a monopoly when MS is losing at one thing. lol.
How does Sony losing their investment in the studio help them make a monopoly?
How does not competing with mobile games further a monopoly?
I'm sorry guys but this press release says words that appear to make sense but in context they do not. In fact, can anyone explain this to me?