nogoodnamesleft
Banned
58 pages. Damn.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
DriveClub Review Thread.
- Thread starter Saty
- Start date
SmoothRunningGun
Member
This is my question. Everyone keeps saying go try the ps+ version but it doesn't seem to exist yet.
Yup. And to be clear, there's nothing wrong with not thinking this type of racer is for you and finding problems with it. But you had better elevate the level of your criticisms above "a-herpity derpy old school racers are bad" and "open world is the wave of the future" and "why cantz I upgrade my vehicle waaahhh" if you expect your review to be respected and taken seriously. All I ask from any reviewer is that they demonstrate they even twenty five percent of a grasp on the genre they're reviewing games for. I mean Christ, I didn't think that would be so hard to ask for before this topic, but clearly even racing games can't escape the self-fellating nonsense that passes for games criticism these days.
kinoki
Illness is the doctor to whom we pay most heed; to kindness, to knowledge, we make promise only; pain we obey.
It stems mostly from that I consider Motorstorm an action-series that just happens to be a racer. I liked the original because of the intense battles between bikes and trucks in an ever changing landscape.
Pacific Rift is an arcade racer and scaled back on the action I love with the original. I enjoy it a lot. The multiplayer was awesome (RIP) but the campaign drags due to crazy rubberbanding. It is a good game but the slight tweak in pacing makes me enjoy it less overall.
Apocalypse, on the other hand, went back to formula and made an action game again. I think it's a really good game and I wish they'd explore the concept again. One of those gems I come back to every so often just for the fun of it.
Driveclub, if I were to steer the subject matter back on topic, is an arcade racer and the sweet spot between Ridge Racer (RIP) and Gran Turismo (which I consider really good but awfully boring). I think it excels at its niche.
boredandlazy
Member
Nah, it was 59. But I bought it online with a $15 off voucher when the price was $69, then emailed Dick Smith to take the extra $10 bonus off for preordering. Still, the season pass is $38... Not sure if I'm going to fork out for that.
Raonak
Banned
Yeah, okay, just played it for 2 hours, got 13 stars so far (atleast 8 races?)
I have no idea what reviewer's expectations were... but Drive Club plays really good.
Handling is very unique, doesn't feel arcadey like NFS, but not sim like GT. You are definitely gonna use your brakes around corners.
I quite like it. and think Jeff is legit crazy, if theres one thing it does really good, it's the handling.
The penalities were strange at first, had to go mentally re-write my impulses to go try sideswipe cars and go ramming into corners. I have no doubt this is gonna be useful online.
Sense of speed is VERY well done. That was a problem in GT where even fast cars felt slow, definitely not the case here, even with the starting lineup of cars feel fast.
Graphics look good, day/ngiht cycle is awesome, india is kinda underwelming tbh. And aliasing is kinda bad :/, you don't notice it while driving but yeah, the IQ isn't up there with infamous, or even killzone.
tl;dr: amir0x was right.
I sorta feel this game will do a good job at getting me trained up for GT7.
I have no idea what reviewer's expectations were... but Drive Club plays really good.
Handling is very unique, doesn't feel arcadey like NFS, but not sim like GT. You are definitely gonna use your brakes around corners.
I quite like it. and think Jeff is legit crazy, if theres one thing it does really good, it's the handling.
The penalities were strange at first, had to go mentally re-write my impulses to go try sideswipe cars and go ramming into corners. I have no doubt this is gonna be useful online.
Sense of speed is VERY well done. That was a problem in GT where even fast cars felt slow, definitely not the case here, even with the starting lineup of cars feel fast.
Graphics look good, day/ngiht cycle is awesome, india is kinda underwelming tbh. And aliasing is kinda bad :/, you don't notice it while driving but yeah, the IQ isn't up there with infamous, or even killzone.
tl;dr: amir0x was right.
I sorta feel this game will do a good job at getting me trained up for GT7.
Average of all the reviews is 74. Weighting must be what drags it down to 72.
90-100: 3
80-89: 17
70-79: 17
60-69: 5
<60: 4
FlutterPuffs
Member
DriveClub reminds me of Titanfall or any other MP shooters. Sparse on single player because the focus is on online racing.
What it does, Driveclub does well, Graphics is top notch, and the cloud system actually matters to gameplay. Handling is arcade-ish without being simple. Music is fantastic to drive to, if you opt for it.
I really like the focus on making everything simple. It's a game where I can just enter, and get into a race as quickly as I can. One of those games that you can go to when you just want to get away from Real Life for a bit. Fantastic.
I really love the usage of flags and flares to tell you how hard a turn is as well. The game doesn't hold your hand, but gently nudges you to the right direction when it can.
Of course, there's problems. The livery system could use an upheaval. I like my retro stylings but it should be custom. The fact that I can't just pick another plain color for my car before I drive it is annoying as well. Not having Replay yet is annoying, because some of the races I had were so much fun that I want to watch how I really did again.
Not to mention that the servers have been down for most of us for the last 2 days. Sony fucked up on that one. Again.
This game is the definition of an arcade racing game. Hell, I'll say it's perfect for dads, or people my age since honest to god it feels so good to just play a game without having distracted by something else. I don't think it deserves a 5, or a 7. Should be an 8 honestly, and most probably will be bumped to an 8.5 or 9 once the Replay and Weather update hits.
What it does, Driveclub does well, Graphics is top notch, and the cloud system actually matters to gameplay. Handling is arcade-ish without being simple. Music is fantastic to drive to, if you opt for it.
I really like the focus on making everything simple. It's a game where I can just enter, and get into a race as quickly as I can. One of those games that you can go to when you just want to get away from Real Life for a bit. Fantastic.
I really love the usage of flags and flares to tell you how hard a turn is as well. The game doesn't hold your hand, but gently nudges you to the right direction when it can.
Of course, there's problems. The livery system could use an upheaval. I like my retro stylings but it should be custom. The fact that I can't just pick another plain color for my car before I drive it is annoying as well. Not having Replay yet is annoying, because some of the races I had were so much fun that I want to watch how I really did again.
Not to mention that the servers have been down for most of us for the last 2 days. Sony fucked up on that one. Again.
This game is the definition of an arcade racing game. Hell, I'll say it's perfect for dads, or people my age since honest to god it feels so good to just play a game without having distracted by something else. I don't think it deserves a 5, or a 7. Should be an 8 honestly, and most probably will be bumped to an 8.5 or 9 once the Replay and Weather update hits.
Catatafish
Banned
Honestly not really surprised by the reviews. Almost every thread for DC was exclusively praising the game for its graphics, Full weather cycle, realistic lighting, etc...,Barely anyone mentioned DC's gameplay, car handling, AI, customization options, you know, mechanics that makes a good racing game.
travisbickle
Member
Evolution were on stage at an event (e3 or gamescom) showing it off. The last time I really watched these guys was at e3 last year, and they seem to only believe/rely on things that are told to them back stage or over heard by people they can't mention the name of, they appear elitist.
March of the Crabs
Member
Bought it. Played a bit. It's cool and feels good to play. Just wish they could get their shit together and let us use the main focus of the game (the social stuff).
Ingueferroque
Banned
Nice assumption, too bad a lot of people that own it think it handles and feels perfectly. Try before you judge.
Did not notice it, but the AI is aggressive.
Yeah they showed it off a few weeks ago, with the photo mode. Jeff was acting like we haven't heard about it in years.
FlutterPuffs
Member
Go to the OT now then. There's people praising the gameplay and AI in every page.
Why didn't we praise the mechanics before? Simple.
It was just released yesterday.
Thought so myself, I've read several comments on it NOT being in the game.
I stopped reading the review after that mention.
Raonak
Banned
Gameplay - good
Car handling - great
AI - havent had any problems so far, but im on easy events right now.
Customisation Options - bad
Doctor_Thomas
Member
It is currently on my PS4... but I need to wait until Friday.
I am really excited at the prospect of a racing game for my PS4.
I am really excited at the prospect of a racing game for my PS4.
FlutterPuffs
Member
I love the AI actually, they are such bastards.
I know many hope they dont collide with you most of the time, but the AI actually play like most people online.
I know many hope they dont collide with you most of the time, but the AI actually play like most people online.
GrizzleBoy
Banned
The problem is the level of hype fans created.
Just like Destiny.
What the fuck are people doing creating such levels of hype for a game nobody even has gameplay footage of? Or have even played a year after announcement?
Then when reality doesn't match the hype in the form of the game being okay, but nothing really special, people either can't believe their eyes or meltdown.
There isn't even anything wrong with the game being okay, but when an entire community (and many more) is already professing about what the game is going to be when probably less than 2% have even seen it with heir own eyes! let alone played it, you're fucked from the beginning.
I say this in every thread about games that have so much hype. SCREW HYPE.
Seriously they are right bastards. I feel like they are all aiming to kill me, and I love every second lol
Ingueferroque
Banned
Yeah I like it too, makes overtaking tense.
That is mighty interesting actually.
Gameplay and handling is amazing though.
Jawbreaker
Member
Destiny had a public beta and alpha.
Bloodworth
Member
I wonder how much of Forza's Drivatars just gives them more of an excuse for aggressive behavior - people don't think of it as the "AI sucks" but "these virtual people from my friends list suck".
How is that true when I can't tune handling settings?
I think that's a real concern. I want to be able to do that.
My feelings exactly. Much talk about the presentation but not much else. Not a very good sign.
Jawbreaker
Member
Not mutually exclusive.
Ok but don't you have to use a special code and then get $10 off pre order or whatever?
Also I'm overseas and there's no way I can get that price... (I'm still using AU PSN though)
GrizzleBoy
Banned
The hype for that game was already at gargantuan levels over a year ago and the early access couldn't stop it.
Not to mention that said hype made people want to believe that what they played was just a taster, not the entire framework of the game.
GrizzleBoy
Banned
The word "fantastic" as a description for handling and AI aren't universal either.
toddhunter
Member
All the hype I saw was for a great looking game where you drive in races.
Isn't that pretty much what happened?
Don't see how that is linked.
I've been playing it for 2 hours on my T500RS now and I'm really really enjoying it. Sure, options would be nice, but for me the driving model feels so good I wouldn't want to change anything, honestly.
Ingueferroque
Banned
Or maybe some people actually enjoy Destiny? Let's try to imagine.
His tweet the other day about doing taxes over playing the game should tell you something how he feels about the game.
Coolbgdog12
Member
Sadly people are going to skip this game because of a arbitrary number.
Antiwhippy
the holder of the trombone
No one else other than drew likes racing games, and drew doesn't have a ps4.
Catatafish
Banned
Oh I completely understand, just trying to rationalize the discrepancy between reviews and the public reception. I am sure the gameplay is fine based on fans reception (Have not tried the game yet, will do once I finish my thesis), but maybe reviewers this generation is more critical about gameplay and social aspects of a racing game? Do not yet understand why the game has mixed reception among reviewers?
Its a bit like Sleeping Dogs.
This is why we can't have nice things.
Sleeping Dogs reviewed pretty good but not amazing, yet it was my GOTY 2012 and I know a lot of people on GAF liked it a lot. Another game reviewers don't really give a shit about.
If its not Star Wars or Skyrim or GTA or Call of Duty or Halo or Lord of the Rings, reviewers aren't interested. Unless its a niche game like Tearaway then every reviewer and his dog is telling everyone to buy it.
This is why we can't have nice things.
Sleeping Dogs reviewed pretty good but not amazing, yet it was my GOTY 2012 and I know a lot of people on GAF liked it a lot. Another game reviewers don't really give a shit about.
If its not Star Wars or Skyrim or GTA or Call of Duty or Halo or Lord of the Rings, reviewers aren't interested. Unless its a niche game like Tearaway then every reviewer and his dog is telling everyone to buy it.
Jawbreaker
Member
I don't know about that. I noticed a lot of people were pretty indifferent towards Destiny before the public beta and alpha. Heck, I didn't care much for the game until I got my hands on the beta. I think it's a case where the sneak peak delivered the majority of the experience, and people were understandably expecting more out of the game. I get your point about people setting themselves up for disappointment with plenty of games, but in the case of Destiny at least, people had a good taste of what they were getting into. Unfortunately, the full game doesn't offer much beyond that. However, it's still an enjoyable experience for many, even those who agree with the criticisms.
Yeah.
That's why I never read mainstream review outlets, and just select from my trusted GAFer list to read impressions from.
I have a pretty fullproof method too. Whereas most people add people to their trust list when they see someone agrees with them, I'm exactly the opposite. I only add someone to my list when I love/hate something and then I read a poster who passionately disagrees with my stance, but clearly has a commanding grasp of what makes a critique compelling and does a grand job at justifying their position. The mark of a great reviewer is when you can respect their position even when you disagree on the absolute strongest terms.
Works for me almost 100% so far, and works waaay better than just randomly selecting from GAF as well.
