By posting this I recognize I risk derailing the thread a bit, but I think it should be said. I'll preface by saying that I am kind of coming at this from an outsider perspective who is only starting to get interested in higher end figure collecting -- I have purchased/been given a few figmas, and I dig all of it.
I'll also preface by saying that I am not offended by sex or sexuality, real or depicted in a statue. I don't foresee buying an overly sexual statue or figure myself, but I am not offended by it nor would I judge anyone who bought one. Live and let live.
So onto my point -- I don't want to single any forum members out for attack, and that's the reason I won't link to any posts, but I will say there are some figures out there -- including referenced in this thread -- which depict clearly underage girls (or ones intended to appear underage) in a sexual context, either by their clothing or their pose or how they are articulated.
For lack of a better word, it's creepy. And I was just wondering what the community here thought of this and why it seems to be tolerated. Statues like this aren't so frequent that I see them on every page, but after going back a ways through the history I've seen a few examples of statues that make me uncomfortable.