U n i o n 0015
Member
It's on my list, but I generally don't pay $60 for PC games. $40 and lower, sure.
Wishful thinking.Indeed. Let's hope the success of Dragon Quest III helps with opening their eyes a little bit.
Sad, but true.Wishful thinking.
It's on my list, but I generally don't pay $60 for PC games. $40 and lower, sure.
It's on my list, but I generally don't pay $60 for PC games. $40 and lower, sure.
Most day 1 games on PC are between 40$ and 50$ bucks if you know where to get them.
See now this is the reason us playstation pro gamers set the zeitgeist.
PC gamers, here you are. Found you. Buy a 2000 dollar gaming rig to play the humble bundle game from 1998 for 2 cents a license or just "preserve" a new Nintendo game by emulating it then get on here and try to convince me to "upgrade" to PC. Sheeeeeet...
See now this is the reason us playstation pro gamers set the zeitgeist.
PC gamers, here you are. Found you. Buy a 2000 dollar gaming rig to play the humble bundle game from 1998 for 2 cents a license or just "preserve" a new Nintendo game by emulating it then get on here and try to convince me to "upgrade" to PC. Sheeeeeet...
This is the problem with these staggered releases, by the time you port it everybody already knows the game stinks
3mil first week on ps. So ps love mid and must not have gamesI hate to break it to SE, Xbox, and Sony, but releasing games everywhere does not equate to exponentially higher sales. if you game is MID, it's going to be MID everywhere
Me during those cutscenes:More watching cutscenes and walking toward cursors for MORE CUTSCENES than anything resembling actual gameplay. What a fucking slog.
I thought XVI was a failure as a JRPG and a failure as a character action game. Yeah the boss battles were cool but the other 95% was so boring. I fell asleep multiple times before I dropped it around the 70% mark. And this is coming from someone who was totally onboard with the shift to a mature GoT style story + action battles.
And I know I’m not the only one who felt that way.
Hey I am not here to argue. It's ok you didn't like it.It’s not an indie game, but I wouldn’t call those fights impressive. They quickly became stale, as all the enemies are just HP sponges.
I hated that the HP pools felt like mere checkpoints for the next phase of the fight. Especially during the Titan fight.
This is revisionist history like fuck, lol. Spiderman alone sold close to 30 million copies on ps4/ps5. Its the highest selling superhero game of all time, and elementsfrom the game appeared in two different Spiderman movies. Your opinion if you like the game is subjective, but its far from average.Spider-man remastered sold 1.5 millions copies in a month on steam/epic even though it had been out for an eternity on console
It has nothing to do with release it day one on all platforms. The game was just average
Hey I am not here to argue.
It's 50$ on steam.Delayed releases on PC at full price won't work. Single player games can sell great if they are good and released in a timely fashion. There is a ridiculous amount of games to choose from as it is on PC, I feel like people don't get this. The only ones who seem to get away with delayed releases are Rockstar. No one else has an IP like that.
Mostly bots. Game lets you sell stuff which is why it has such large numbers.
It's 50$ on steam.
Was 70$ on ps5. It's not full price
Wishful thinking.
Horizon sold 4 million over several years, not right away. And it got a ton of coverage and notoriety because as far as I remember it was the first of these big Playstation exclusives to make the jump to PC.Horizon sold almost 4 million copies on PC after being released 3 years later. Good games sells.
FFXVI underperformed on ps5, it wasnt a very good game nor rpg.
It will not sell well on any other platforms, that's just it.
It launched at $49.99It's on my list, but I generally don't pay $60 for PC games. $40 and lower, sure.
At this point it's not about the price anymore. Thing was 40$ on cdkeys day1 on pc and still is.Even then it's obviously not enough of a discount looking at their underwhelming sales figues. My main point is though, staggered releases aren't a good idea and Square Enix have talked about releasing games simultaneously on PC in the future. You gotta ride that release hype.
Maybe it was but it's such a good game. I think it's better than 16.That’s cause final fantasy 15 was a cock boyband simulator game
Like Concord, Horizon Lego, Horizon ZD remaster, and Until Dawn?
I think it's time to admit that the audience on PC and audience on consoles simply dont have the same taste. Plenty of third party games launch on PC day one and we know they max out at 10-15%.
Same here. The moment when you see the photos and memories you created together was truly incredible.Maybe it was but it's such a good game. I think it's better than 16.
I actually cried on the ending lol
It launched at $49.99
Next time release it day one.
One is a live service game and the other one is GTA. Why ignore the countless examples and use obvious exceptions?I agree. I don't think day 1 release matters as much as people make it out to be. Sea of Thieves sold great on PS and it's a 5 year old game. GTA6 won't be day 1 on PC, but I guarantee it will still sell millions of copies on PC when it eventually makes it over there.
Ah! That's why then I think; if your FF references are limited to those recent titles, I totally understand why you liked them that much. Nothing wrong about that but it could explain why your perception of the game is different from old folks like me that played the complete series. As a DMC type of game, FFXVI is sure a flashy thing. But it's not a Final Fantasy per se, from my point of view.But XV is the best one.
It's such a weird and fantastic game.
I only played Remake, XV, 16, Rebirth and XV is my fav out of these and it's soundtrack is downright dangerous to play in a car lol