I don't remember bards every being a bad class in 2.X due to them being able to move and shoot which made it easier for them to manage DPSing during new mechanics. Their utility obviously outweighed the slight loss of DPS.
With 3.X it looks like the DPS is comparatively worse as well as the utility. It will be interesting to see how things play out in savage Alexander.
Again, I'm not encouraging the ivory tower shit, I am just understanding where it stems from. No amount of ranting on the internet will convince the elitists to open their groups.
Avoiding the dogpile of bards, I do see what you're saying and I'm interested to see how things shake out as well in regard to bard.
I don't think that anyone can argue that with the content we currently have available to us that bard's utility is nowhere near as important as it used to be. So far.
At the same time, we don't know what a long fight looks like yet. We don't know how the MP system will hold up against the new damage output of Alex Savage. We don't really have any baseline at all for what will be good or bad about the classes.
The thing is, bards don't need to use WM. They don't need to sacrifice their movement for a marginal dps gain/loss. Their damage is just fine as it stands right now when dealing with Bismarck and Ravana extremes. I think every Ravana clear I have has had two bards in it. Heck, we farmed once with two bards and a machinist with minimal issues.
Just keep in mind that bards are gaining a 5% damage increase over 2.x bards while singing ballad/paeon, so their damage is going to actually be -better- than it used to be. I don't realistically see bard going away anytime soon. A lot of the elite groups do use bards, and just in case they don't doesn't mean that bard is a bad class.