Tom Welling could of filled those shoes *kicks trash can*
Should of stuck with Tom. This guy has the face for it but the costumes looks so off on him.
- Handsome, tall male
- Red and blue costume
- Superman logo on the chest
Looks like Supes to me. Whether you like it or not, that is something else.
... really? I think that's just as corny as the red underoos.He don't look like Superman without the spit curl.
All I can picture now is Supergirl beating the shit out of him, seriously they could have taken a better photo smh
Then again, maybe that's the point hah
On the other hand, Benoist is reaching critical levels of adorable.
... really? I think that's just as corny as the red underoos.
He don't look like Superman without the spit curl.
Show has a lot of good qualities but she's so charming it elevates the series.
There's like a million reasons, casting and press shots aren't one, let alone the major reason.This is why these shows aren't worth watching.
In all fairness to that guy, he has impossible shoes to fill. I mean, look at Cavill, dude looks like a beast.
edit: lol at the tripple Cavill Superman pic posts.
They really shit the bed with not bringing back Tom Welling.
#WeWantWelling
Yeah, even The Flash brought the old Flash back. Would've been nice for fans.They really shit the bed with not bringing back Tom Welling.
#WeWantWelling
struggleman
man of aluminum
clark can't
green skittles are his weakness
works for the monthly bugle
This is why I thank Snyder.
Wow, that doesn't even look like the same guy.
I mean the Superman pic is not flattering whatsoever.
I think he will look better if he smiles.
Edit: And maybe have a better pose
I mean the Superman pic is not flattering whatsoever.
Should've gone with the trunks!
awful photoshop but he will look good in action.
Not only he made a couple of good movies, his suits and overall visual direction is flawless. As evidenced here, it takes craftsmanship for these things to work on screen.Because he made a couple of awful movies?
Is could of not correct? English is my second language so i could be entirely wrong but i am saying he could of filled those shoes if given the opportunity i think saying "should of filled the shoes" doesn't sound right.Off topic, but seeing these two posts one right after the other:
AAAAAAAAAAAAARGH
Not only he made a couple of good movies, his suits and overall visual direction is flawless. As evidenced here, it takes craftsmanship for these things to work on screen.
They really shit the bed with not bringing back Tom Welling.
#WeWantWelling
Not only he made a couple of good movies, his suits and overall visual direction is flawless. As evidenced here, it takes craftsmanship for these things to work on screen.
Haha ok, you got me, I laughed.
Is could of not correct? English is my second language so i could be entirely wrong but i am saying he could of filled those shoes if given the opportunity i think saying "should of filled the shoes" doesn't sound right.
unless of course we are talking about completely different things here.
It's "could have", shortened to "could've". Or "should've", if that's what you're going for.
Sounds like "could of", but it is not.
Not only he made a couple of good movies, his suits and overall visual direction is flawless. As evidenced here, it takes craftsmanship for these things to work on screen.
The evidence here being the absolutely lack of craftsmanship that makes this look stupid lol
Hey man, Ahasverus and I are like the only Snyder fans on the internet. Give him a break, shit is rough.
Care to explain the dead meat soon? I've seen some posts mentioning the same thing but im confused